Homo Legens: A person Reading

The article raises the problem of the psychology of fiction as a form of art from the standpoint of cultural and historical methodology. Separately, based on the ideas of M.M. Bakhtin about the dialogic nature of the text and A.N. Leontiev about the communicative nature of art, issues related to the...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Kulʹturno-istoricheskai͡a︡ psikhologii͡a Ročník 21; číslo 1; s. 102 - 113
Hlavný autor: Stepanova, M.A.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 09.04.2025
ISSN:1816-5435, 2224-8935
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract The article raises the problem of the psychology of fiction as a form of art from the standpoint of cultural and historical methodology. Separately, based on the ideas of M.M. Bakhtin about the dialogic nature of the text and A.N. Leontiev about the communicative nature of art, issues related to the creation of works of art and their understanding are considered, which is reflected in the sections "the work of the author" and "the work of the reader". The meeting of the author and the reader means the birth of Homo Legens - the Reading Man: this publication is devoted to the study of this phenomenon. Fiction (as the author's work) can be analyzed in two ways: on the one hand, it acts as an object of psychological research, and on the other - its subject, an independent carrier of psychological knowledge. In the first case, literature is either an object of scientific and psychological study, or its means; in the second, the possibility of treating literature as a carrier of extra-scientific psychological knowledge is substantiated, which determines its its psychotechnical effect on the reader. The reader's perception of a literary work (the reader's work) is analyzed from artistic and scientific positions, which complement each other. Based on L.S. Vygotsky's ideas about the activity of aesthetic experience and P.Ya. Galperin's doctrine of interiorization, the point of view is substantiated according to which the reader's understanding of a literary work is a process of its active recreation, which is consonant with V.F. Asmus's ideas about reading as creativity. In conclusion, using fiction as an example, a conclusion is made about the productivity of turning to scientific and non-scientific (literary) sources of psychological knowledge in developing issues of the psychology of art. В статье с позиций культурно-исторической методологии поднимается проблема психологии художественной литературы как вида искусства. Отдельно, отталкиваясь от представлений М.М. Бахтина о диалогичности текста и А.Н. Леонтьева о коммуникативной природе искусства, рассматриваются вопросы, связанные с созданием художественных произведений и их пониманием, что получило отражение в разделах «Работа автора» и «Работа читателя». Встреча автора и читателя означает рождение Homo Legens - Человека читающего. Исследованию этого феномена и посвящена данная публикация. Художественную литературу (как работу автора) можно анализировать двояко: с одной стороны, она выступает предметом психологического исследования, а с другой - ее субъектом, самостоятельным носителем психологического знания. В первом случае литература представляет собой либо объект научно-психологического изучения, либо его средство; во втором - обосновывается возможность отношения к литературе как к носителю вненаучного психологического знания, чем и обусловлено ее психотехническое воздействие на читателя. Восприятие литературного произведения читателем (работа читателя) анализируется с художественных и научных позиций, которые взаимодополняют друг друга. С опорой на представления Л.С. Выготского об активности эстетического переживания и учение об интериоризации П.Я. Гальперина обосновывается точка зрения, согласно которой понимание литературного произведения читателем есть процесс его активного воссоздания, что созвучно представлениям В.Ф. Асмуса о чтении как творчестве. В заключение на примере художественной литературы делается вывод о продуктивности обращения к научным и вненаучным (литературным) источникам психологического знания при разработке вопросов психологии искусства.
AbstractList The article raises the problem of the psychology of fiction as a form of art from the standpoint of cultural and historical methodology. Separately, based on the ideas of M.M. Bakhtin about the dialogic nature of the text and A.N. Leontiev about the communicative nature of art, issues related to the creation of works of art and their understanding are considered, which is reflected in the sections "the work of the author" and "the work of the reader". The meeting of the author and the reader means the birth of Homo Legens - the Reading Man: this publication is devoted to the study of this phenomenon. Fiction (as the author's work) can be analyzed in two ways: on the one hand, it acts as an object of psychological research, and on the other - its subject, an independent carrier of psychological knowledge. In the first case, literature is either an object of scientific and psychological study, or its means; in the second, the possibility of treating literature as a carrier of extra-scientific psychological knowledge is substantiated, which determines its its psychotechnical effect on the reader. The reader's perception of a literary work (the reader's work) is analyzed from artistic and scientific positions, which complement each other. Based on L.S. Vygotsky's ideas about the activity of aesthetic experience and P.Ya. Galperin's doctrine of interiorization, the point of view is substantiated according to which the reader's understanding of a literary work is a process of its active recreation, which is consonant with V.F. Asmus's ideas about reading as creativity. In conclusion, using fiction as an example, a conclusion is made about the productivity of turning to scientific and non-scientific (literary) sources of psychological knowledge in developing issues of the psychology of art.
The article raises the problem of the psychology of fiction as a form of art from the standpoint of cultural and historical methodology. Separately, based on the ideas of M.M. Bakhtin about the dialogic nature of the text and A.N. Leontiev about the communicative nature of art, issues related to the creation of works of art and their understanding are considered, which is reflected in the sections "the work of the author" and "the work of the reader". The meeting of the author and the reader means the birth of Homo Legens - the Reading Man: this publication is devoted to the study of this phenomenon. Fiction (as the author's work) can be analyzed in two ways: on the one hand, it acts as an object of psychological research, and on the other - its subject, an independent carrier of psychological knowledge. In the first case, literature is either an object of scientific and psychological study, or its means; in the second, the possibility of treating literature as a carrier of extra-scientific psychological knowledge is substantiated, which determines its its psychotechnical effect on the reader. The reader's perception of a literary work (the reader's work) is analyzed from artistic and scientific positions, which complement each other. Based on L.S. Vygotsky's ideas about the activity of aesthetic experience and P.Ya. Galperin's doctrine of interiorization, the point of view is substantiated according to which the reader's understanding of a literary work is a process of its active recreation, which is consonant with V.F. Asmus's ideas about reading as creativity. In conclusion, using fiction as an example, a conclusion is made about the productivity of turning to scientific and non-scientific (literary) sources of psychological knowledge in developing issues of the psychology of art. В статье с позиций культурно-исторической методологии поднимается проблема психологии художественной литературы как вида искусства. Отдельно, отталкиваясь от представлений М.М. Бахтина о диалогичности текста и А.Н. Леонтьева о коммуникативной природе искусства, рассматриваются вопросы, связанные с созданием художественных произведений и их пониманием, что получило отражение в разделах «Работа автора» и «Работа читателя». Встреча автора и читателя означает рождение Homo Legens - Человека читающего. Исследованию этого феномена и посвящена данная публикация. Художественную литературу (как работу автора) можно анализировать двояко: с одной стороны, она выступает предметом психологического исследования, а с другой - ее субъектом, самостоятельным носителем психологического знания. В первом случае литература представляет собой либо объект научно-психологического изучения, либо его средство; во втором - обосновывается возможность отношения к литературе как к носителю вненаучного психологического знания, чем и обусловлено ее психотехническое воздействие на читателя. Восприятие литературного произведения читателем (работа читателя) анализируется с художественных и научных позиций, которые взаимодополняют друг друга. С опорой на представления Л.С. Выготского об активности эстетического переживания и учение об интериоризации П.Я. Гальперина обосновывается точка зрения, согласно которой понимание литературного произведения читателем есть процесс его активного воссоздания, что созвучно представлениям В.Ф. Асмуса о чтении как творчестве. В заключение на примере художественной литературы делается вывод о продуктивности обращения к научным и вненаучным (литературным) источникам психологического знания при разработке вопросов психологии искусства.
Author Stepanova, M.A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M.A.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2308-058X
  surname: Stepanova
  fullname: Stepanova, M.A.
  organization: M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
BookMark eNpFkEtLAzEUhYNUsNauXQnzB6bNvXfycleKj0JBEF2HTCapI-2kJG789w6t6OrA4fAd-K7ZZEhDYOwW-AKUEmbpP44L5CgQOABcsCkiNrU2JCZsChpkLRoSV2xeSt9ylEYBCjFld8_pkKpt2IWh3Fer6hhySUP1GlzXD7sbdhndvoT5b87Y--PD2_q53r48bdarbe0RDNRRO05Ck-6wdcE7ICelE9J1nIPQQEaZSOgUGHS-1RSF8l1nCIk344xmbHPmdsl92mPuDy5_2-R6eypS3lmXv3q_D9a3UXIKEKjBRorxLxCOlfBGUYg4spZnls-plBziHw-4Pcmyoyz7L4t-ALHWW3g
Cites_doi 10.30547/vestnik.journ.5.2022.102128
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.17759/chp.2025210111
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 2224-8935
EndPage 113
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_cbf603e1e342465baee32f605c973ef2
10_17759_chp_2025210111
GroupedDBID 642
AAYXX
ABIVO
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
EJD
GROUPED_DOAJ
KQ8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2191-f8a035838d2baeca13a66a56ad0015813979f32a7192acb83f57cdd93230456a3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1816-5435
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:53:13 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:58:54 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2191-f8a035838d2baeca13a66a56ad0015813979f32a7192acb83f57cdd93230456a3
ORCID 0000-0002-2308-058X
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/cbf603e1e342465baee32f605c973ef2
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbf603e1e342465baee32f605c973ef2
crossref_primary_10_17759_chp_2025210111
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-04-09
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-04-09
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-04-09
  day: 09
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Kulʹturno-istoricheskai͡a︡ psikhologii͡a
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Publisher_xml – name: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
References 44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
References_xml – ident: 2
– ident: 39
– ident: 12
– ident: 35
– ident: 51
– ident: 16
– ident: 31
– ident: 9
– ident: 49
– ident: 45
– ident: 26
– ident: 41
– ident: 22
– ident: 17
– ident: 5
– ident: 1
– ident: 38
– ident: 34
– ident: 13
– ident: 50
– ident: 30
– ident: 48
– ident: 8
– ident: 27
– ident: 44
– ident: 23
– ident: 40
– ident: 18
– ident: 4
– ident: 43
  doi: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.5.2022.102128
– ident: 37
– ident: 33
– ident: 10
– ident: 14
– ident: 28
– ident: 53
– ident: 24
– ident: 7
– ident: 47
– ident: 20
– ident: 42
– ident: 3
– ident: 36
– ident: 11
– ident: 19
– ident: 52
– ident: 15
– ident: 32
– ident: 29
– ident: 6
– ident: 46
– ident: 21
– ident: 25
SSID ssib026971255
ssj0000626773
ssib027829817
Score 2.2877967
Snippet The article raises the problem of the psychology of fiction as a form of art from the standpoint of cultural and historical methodology. Separately, based on...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
StartPage 102
Title Homo Legens: A person Reading
URI https://doaj.org/article/cbf603e1e342465baee32f605c973ef2
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2224-8935
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000626773
  issn: 1816-5435
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELVQxdAF8SkKFGVgYLGa2PEXW0FUHVDFAFK3yDnbgoG2agsS_56zE0qZWFitKLLvzvfeyad3hFwh63bByppKh7epZExRJPVAwQmrgiwd5C4Nm1CTiZ5OzePWqK_YE9bIAzeGG0AdZM594XnJSilq6z1nuCTAKO5Dyr65MlvFFEYSk0Yhcm8ilSEOGt0S-SZHM6nS8zMinKQCSUOr-6OUMAN4iVKWDKEtjmL_BVlbyv4Jgkb7ZK_ljtmw2fMB2fGzQ9LdpLDPI9Ifz9_m2YPHqFjdZMNskfh01nbKH5Pn0f3T3Zi2AxAoYCIpaNA25_Fd0zE8N9iCWymtkNZFqqMjeTOBM6uQplmoNQ9CgXNIyeL7p7T8hHRm85k_JZkTRoD2mgE3pbHKFKE2WGuFMq8h5K5Hrr_PWC0anYsq1gfRHBWao_oxR4_cRhtsPosC1WkB3Va1bqv-ctvZf_zknHTjtlIjjbkgnfXy3ffJLnysX1fLyxQRX3dLsr0
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Homo+Legens%3A+A+person+Reading&rft.jtitle=Kul%CA%B9turno-istoricheskai%CD%A1a%EF%B8%A1+psikhologii%CD%A1a&rft.au=M.A.+Stepanova&rft.date=2025-04-09&rft.pub=Moscow+State+University+of+Psychology+and+Education&rft.issn=1816-5435&rft.eissn=2224-8935&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=113&rft_id=info:doi/10.17759%2Fchp.2025210111&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_cbf603e1e342465baee32f605c973ef2
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1816-5435&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1816-5435&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1816-5435&client=summon