P150 Exploiting I-wave rhythmicity to optimize the stimulus-response relationship for TMS of M1
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can modulate corticospinal excitability beyond the time of stimulation, but the after-effects are subject to substantial variability. One determining factor are inter-individual differences in the way TMS stimulates...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Clinical neurophysiology Ročník 128; číslo 3; s. e88 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Elsevier B.V
01.03.2017
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1388-2457, 1872-8952 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can modulate corticospinal excitability beyond the time of stimulation, but the after-effects are subject to substantial variability. One determining factor are inter-individual differences in the way TMS stimulates the intracortical circuits that generate the descending volleys (I-waves) in the corticospinal tract.
We systematically studied possibilities to utilize individual I-wave rhythmicity to enhance the efficacy of low-intensity TMS of M1 to excite corticospinal output.
In healthy individuals, we recorded the motor evoked potential (MEP) evoked by paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS. The inter-pulse interval (IPI) was adjusted to the individual I1-peak latency or the trough between the I1- and I2-wave. TMS used biphasic pulses with the second phase inducing a posterior-to-anterior current in M1.
Paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS at individual I-wave peak latency evoked larger MEP amplitudes than single-pulse TMS or paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS at the I1-I2 trough. I1-peak latency facilitation was already visible at 70% resting motor threshold and was comparable for paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS. A control experiment showed significant I1-peak latency facilitation also relative to a control condition in which IPI was shorter than individual I1-latency.
Our preliminary study results support our hypothesis that I-wave interaction can be utilized to optimize the efficacy of TMS over M1 to excite the corticospinal output neurons. The effects are already maximal when using paired-pulse TMS, as triple pulse or quadruple-pulse TMS did not result in additional MEP facilitation. The use of individually adjusted paired-pulse TMS at I-wave latency might help to reduce inter-individual variability of repetitive TMS over human M1.
This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (Grant of Excellence “ContAct” R59 A5399) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Interdisciplinary Synergy Programme Grant ”BASICS” NNF14OC0011413). |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | BackgroundRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can modulate corticospinal excitability beyond the time of stimulation, but the after-effects are subject to substantial variability. One determining factor are inter-individual differences in the way TMS stimulates the intracortical circuits that generate the descending volleys (I-waves) in the corticospinal tract. ObjectiveWe systematically studied possibilities to utilize individual I-wave rhythmicity to enhance the efficacy of low-intensity TMS of M1 to excite corticospinal output. MethodsIn healthy individuals, we recorded the motor evoked potential (MEP) evoked by paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS. The inter-pulse interval (IPI) was adjusted to the individual I1-peak latency or the trough between the I1- and I2-wave. TMS used biphasic pulses with the second phase inducing a posterior-to-anterior current in M1. ResultsPaired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS at individual I-wave peak latency evoked larger MEP amplitudes than single-pulse TMS or paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS at the I1-I2 trough. I1-peak latency facilitation was already visible at 70% resting motor threshold and was comparable for paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS. A control experiment showed significant I1-peak latency facilitation also relative to a control condition in which IPI was shorter than individual I1-latency. ConclusionOur preliminary study results support our hypothesis that I-wave interaction can be utilized to optimize the efficacy of TMS over M1 to excite the corticospinal output neurons. The effects are already maximal when using paired-pulse TMS, as triple pulse or quadruple-pulse TMS did not result in additional MEP facilitation. The use of individually adjusted paired-pulse TMS at I-wave latency might help to reduce inter-individual variability of repetitive TMS over human M1. This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (Grant of Excellence “ContAct” R59 A5399) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Interdisciplinary Synergy Programme Grant ”BASICS” NNF14OC0011413). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can modulate corticospinal excitability beyond the time of stimulation, but the after-effects are subject to substantial variability. One determining factor are inter-individual differences in the way TMS stimulates the intracortical circuits that generate the descending volleys (I-waves) in the corticospinal tract. We systematically studied possibilities to utilize individual I-wave rhythmicity to enhance the efficacy of low-intensity TMS of M1 to excite corticospinal output. In healthy individuals, we recorded the motor evoked potential (MEP) evoked by paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS. The inter-pulse interval (IPI) was adjusted to the individual I1-peak latency or the trough between the I1- and I2-wave. TMS used biphasic pulses with the second phase inducing a posterior-to-anterior current in M1. Paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS at individual I-wave peak latency evoked larger MEP amplitudes than single-pulse TMS or paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS at the I1-I2 trough. I1-peak latency facilitation was already visible at 70% resting motor threshold and was comparable for paired, triple and quadruple pulse TMS. A control experiment showed significant I1-peak latency facilitation also relative to a control condition in which IPI was shorter than individual I1-latency. Our preliminary study results support our hypothesis that I-wave interaction can be utilized to optimize the efficacy of TMS over M1 to excite the corticospinal output neurons. The effects are already maximal when using paired-pulse TMS, as triple pulse or quadruple-pulse TMS did not result in additional MEP facilitation. The use of individually adjusted paired-pulse TMS at I-wave latency might help to reduce inter-individual variability of repetitive TMS over human M1. This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (Grant of Excellence “ContAct” R59 A5399) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Interdisciplinary Synergy Programme Grant ”BASICS” NNF14OC0011413). |
| Author | Siebner, H.R. Karabanov, A.N. Takemi, M. van Bellen, J. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: J. surname: van Bellen fullname: van Bellen, J. – sequence: 2 givenname: M. surname: Takemi fullname: Takemi, M. – sequence: 3 givenname: A.N. surname: Karabanov fullname: Karabanov, A.N. – sequence: 4 givenname: H.R. surname: Siebner fullname: Siebner, H.R. |
| BookMark | eNqVUdtKAzEQDaJgW_0DH_IDWyfJXlIQQcRLoaLQ-hxiOuumbjdLsq3WrzdrfRXxac4MM2dmzhmSw8Y1SMgZgzEDlp-vxqa2TVuNecxiacwLdkAGTBY8kZOMH0YspEx4mhXHZBjCCgAKSPmAqCeWAb35aGtnO9u80mnyrrdIfbXrqrU1ttvRzlHXdnZtP5F2FdIQ8abehMRjaF0TYjfWurMRVralpfN08TCnrqQP7IQclboOePoTR-T59mZxfZ_MHu-m11ezxHCQLClTjhOtDS8yscw0gI5pMSlyAzITBUhpRMQgMjEppWBQ6pznGZQGX1guczEi6Z7XeBeCx1K13q613ykGqhdJrdReJNWL1FejSHHscj-G8batRa-CsdgYXFqPplNLZ_9L0DdZo-s33GFYuY1v4t-KqcAVqHnvQ28DywXI9Jvg4neCv_d_AWndnKg |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2016 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.271 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1872-8952 |
| EndPage | e88 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_clinph_2016_10_271 S1388245716308471 1_s2_0_S1388245716308471 |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -~X .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29B 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 8P~ AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXLA AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABCQJ ABFNM ABFRF ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABTEW ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACIEU ACIUM ACLOT ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AI. AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HX~ HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B M41 MO0 MOBAO MVM N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OHT OP~ OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSN SSZ T5K UAP UNMZH UV1 VH1 X7M XOL XPP Z5R ZGI ~G- ~HD AGCQF AACTN AADPK AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AFCTW AFKWA AFMIJ AHPSJ AJBFU AJOXV AMFUW LCYCR RIG VQA ZA5 9DU AAYXX CITATION |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2081-f42e9aac2753d5a00ae9a7976c08537088c36c003539f8310fa62650fceb16863 |
| ISSN | 1388-2457 |
| IngestDate | Sat Nov 29 06:59:03 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:12:25 EST 2024 Sat Aug 23 01:30:49 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:30:16 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2081-f42e9aac2753d5a00ae9a7976c08537088c36c003539f8310fa62650fceb16863 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2016_10_271 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clinph_2016_10_271 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1388245716308471 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clinph_2016_10_271 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | March 2017 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2017 text: March 2017 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Clinical neurophysiology |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
| SSID | ssj0007042 |
| Score | 2.1973722 |
| Snippet | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can modulate corticospinal excitability beyond the time of stimulation, but... BackgroundRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can modulate corticospinal excitability beyond the time of... |
| SourceID | crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | e88 |
| SubjectTerms | Neurology |
| Title | P150 Exploiting I-wave rhythmicity to optimize the stimulus-response relationship for TMS of M1 |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1388245716308471 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1388245716308471 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.271 |
| Volume | 128 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1872-8952 dateEnd: 20171231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0007042 issn: 1388-2457 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLbKhhAviKsYN_mBN5QoiXN9nKahDWg1sSL1zXJdR8u2JlXTlm3_gH_NObaTBjJpgMRLlLhyY_l89vnsfOeYkPfAAnwZRbGjQsmcMA98R6QwrsDUfh5PI5kKnWf2SzIapZNJdjIY_GhiYTaXSVmmV1fZ4r-aGsrA2Bg6-xfmbv8UCuAejA5XMDtc_8jwJ0C-PmhpXaElzcfOdzxhaHl2vTqbFxJZN_DNCqaKeXGjNPGEYT5fX65rZ2kUs8qGuFgtFyoRx7DgR7WM32WzB01Ypc6KqTdJftmlx9goDACyASDudpvgQs21jGDYln0WqC4oq42erdxR-8NpoaY2KufI_ep2tynA9bU6LbN31ouf0dMtQ-OFJkV1Ox8HaQd4rDO7KnMCoHXU9qnnA8x2xLmLoaUL_N7kxy4q3s1RL79l1z7FJmALgJd66Knvkd0giTKYIHf3jw8nn1q3nnj6JKa2yU0cphYL9t91O8_pcJfxY_LILjrovgHLEzJQ5VPyYGhlFc8IR8zQLWaowQztYIauKtpghgJmaA8ztIsZCpihgBla5XToPyffPh6OD44ce_KGIwPgiE4eBioTQkJPsFkkPE_AYwLMVQJDZwl4Jsng3mMRy3I8qi4XsDCOvFyC64_TmL0gO2VVqpeEzjJfCDETPuZRmmUR5lcULGbTWCZ5qNgecZp-4guTYIU3ysNzbvqVY79iKfTrHomazuRN8DC4Ow7Wv6Necls9VduhW3Of1wH3eA8R3ZqWlhq6eec7X_1jW1-Th9sh9IbsrJZr9Zbcl5tVUS_fWWD-BNNMsR4 |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P150+Exploiting+I-wave+rhythmicity+to+optimize+the+stimulus-response+relationship+for+TMS+of+M1&rft.jtitle=Clinical+neurophysiology&rft.au=van+Bellen%2C+J.&rft.au=Takemi%2C+M.&rft.au=Karabanov%2C+A.N.&rft.au=Siebner%2C+H.R.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e88&rft.epage=e88&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clinph.2016.10.271&rft.externalDocID=S1388245716308471 |
| thumbnail_m | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F13882457%2FS1388245717X00023%2Fcov150h.gif |