TU‐FF‐A4‐02: Impact of Sinogram Modeling Inaccuracies On Image Quality in X‐Ray CT Imaging Using the Alternating Minimization Algorithm

Purpose: To provide a scientific basis for setting sinogram modeling accuracy targets based on impact of such errors on image quality. Modeling inaccuracies in photon spectrum and scatter distribution assumed by statistical image reconstruction (SIR) algorithms lead to systematic image artifacts. Me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 34; no. 6; p. 2571
Main Authors: Xie, L, Williamson, J, Politte, D, Whiting, B, O'Sullivan, J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: American Association of Physicists in Medicine 01.06.2007
Subjects:
ISSN:0094-2405, 2473-4209
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Purpose: To provide a scientific basis for setting sinogram modeling accuracy targets based on impact of such errors on image quality. Modeling inaccuracies in photon spectrum and scatter distribution assumed by statistical image reconstruction (SIR) algorithms lead to systematic image artifacts. Methods and Materials: A synthetic two‐dimensional phantom (25×35 cm) was used to generate both noiseless and noisy sinogram data, based upon a 120 kVp spectrum filtered by 12 mm Al (66.6 keV mean energy)and variable scatter levels (4%, 20%, and 100% of the minimum primary transmission through the phantom). A third generation Siemens Somatom Plus 4 scanner geometry was assumed. The SIR algorithm was the alternating minimization (AM) algorithm [IEEE TMI 26:283]. 500 AM iterations using 22 ordered subsets were applied to the data. Various mismatches between the assumptions in the algorithm and the truth were studied, including erroneous spectra (110kVp to 130kVp, filtration from 6 mm to 18 mm Al, or 62.2 to 69.7 keV mean energy) and erroneous scatter levels (0.25 to 4.0 times the actual sinogram scatter). Result: AM image quality was evaluated in terms of bias, noise, contrast ratio, etc. To assure +/−2% accuracy in the reconstructed attenuation image, photon spectrum uncertainties corresponding to 2 keV shifts in mean energy can be tolerated. For a 30 cm thick subject, this corresponds to errors in primary transmission of 6%–8%. For 20% scatter levels, the maximum tolerated discrepancy in scatter‐to‐primary ratio (SPR) is about 5% to 8%and 30%–50% for typical MSCT scatter levels. Conclusions: This work indicates AM and other SIR algorithm image estimates are sensitive to errors in the detector response models assumed by the algorithms. For thick patients, a sinogram modeling accuracy of 6% is needed to support reconstructed images of 2% accuracy. Supported in part by NIH grant R01 CA 075371.
AbstractList Purpose: To provide a scientific basis for setting sinogram modeling accuracy targets based on impact of such errors on image quality. Modeling inaccuracies in photon spectrum and scatter distribution assumed by statistical image reconstruction (SIR) algorithms lead to systematic image artifacts. Methods and Materials: A synthetic two‐dimensional phantom (25×35 cm) was used to generate both noiseless and noisy sinogram data, based upon a 120 kVp spectrum filtered by 12 mm Al (66.6 keV mean energy)and variable scatter levels (4%, 20%, and 100% of the minimum primary transmission through the phantom). A third generation Siemens Somatom Plus 4 scanner geometry was assumed. The SIR algorithm was the alternating minimization (AM) algorithm [IEEE TMI 26:283]. 500 AM iterations using 22 ordered subsets were applied to the data. Various mismatches between the assumptions in the algorithm and the truth were studied, including erroneous spectra (110kVp to 130kVp, filtration from 6 mm to 18 mm Al, or 62.2 to 69.7 keV mean energy) and erroneous scatter levels (0.25 to 4.0 times the actual sinogram scatter). Result: AM image quality was evaluated in terms of bias, noise, contrast ratio, etc. To assure +/−2% accuracy in the reconstructed attenuation image, photon spectrum uncertainties corresponding to 2 keV shifts in mean energy can be tolerated. For a 30 cm thick subject, this corresponds to errors in primary transmission of 6%–8%. For 20% scatter levels, the maximum tolerated discrepancy in scatter‐to‐primary ratio (SPR) is about 5% to 8%and 30%–50% for typical MSCT scatter levels. Conclusions: This work indicates AM and other SIR algorithm image estimates are sensitive to errors in the detector response models assumed by the algorithms. For thick patients, a sinogram modeling accuracy of 6% is needed to support reconstructed images of 2% accuracy. Supported in part by NIH grant R01 CA 075371.
Author Whiting, B
Xie, L
Williamson, J
O'Sullivan, J
Politte, D
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: L
  surname: Xie
  fullname: Xie, L
  organization: 3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St Louis, MO
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J
  surname: Williamson
  fullname: Williamson, J
  organization: 3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St Louis, MO
– sequence: 3
  givenname: D
  surname: Politte
  fullname: Politte, D
  organization: 3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St Louis, MO
– sequence: 4
  givenname: B
  surname: Whiting
  fullname: Whiting, B
  organization: 3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St Louis, MO
– sequence: 5
  givenname: J
  surname: O'Sullivan
  fullname: O'Sullivan, J
  organization: 3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St Louis, MO
BookMark eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQepYFtd-AazVUidO5kkM-5KsVpoqT8tuAvDZJKOJJMySZG48g30GX0Sk7Zb3ZzL4Xz3wL0D1LOl1QhdAhkBAL-BEY1CYD4_QX3KIt9jlIge6hMimEcZCc7QoKreCCGhH5A--lqtfz6_p9NWxqwVQm_xrNhKVeMyxS_GlpmTBV6Uic6NzfDMSqV2TiqjK7y0LSszjZ92Mjd1g43Fr23Js2zwZLXPup111Wm90Xic19pZWXd-YawpzEdrStsGWelMvSnO0Wkq80pfHOcQrad3q8mDN1_ezybjuacgirjHEi6pEEoAMCICoqVIFRABNFScCwFERhqE5GGY8kiAn8jW-QmPQPMooP4QXR16lSuryuk03jpTSNfEQOLukzHEx0-2rHdg302um7_BePF45K8PfKVMvb_vn_JfoB6Eyw
CODEN MPHYA6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright American Association of Physicists in Medicine
2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
– notice: 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1118/1.2761438
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physics
EISSN 2473-4209
EndPage 2571
ExternalDocumentID 10_1118_1_2761438
MP1438
Genre abstract
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
.GJ
0R~
1OB
1OC
29M
2WC
33P
36B
3O-
4.4
476
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAQQT
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABFTF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQWH
ABTAH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBEA
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACPOU
ACSMX
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADKYN
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AHBTC
AIACR
AIAGR
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMYDB
ASPBG
BFHJK
C45
CS3
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
G8K
HDBZQ
HGLYW
I-F
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
MEWTI
O9-
OVD
P2P
P2W
PALCI
PHY
RJQFR
RNS
ROL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
USG
WOHZO
WXSBR
XJT
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
ZY4
ZZTAW
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AAYCA
ABDPE
AFWVQ
AITYG
ALVPJ
AAMMB
AAYXX
ABUFD
ADMLS
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
LH4
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1778-4d8a299c91140950ea9fc109126c889910a7e19a866f87913da19a3d871e87523
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISSN 0094-2405
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 04:19:13 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:31:43 EST 2025
Fri Jun 21 00:29:04 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1778-4d8a299c91140950ea9fc109126c889910a7e19a866f87913da19a3d871e87523
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs wiley_primary_10_1118_1_2761438_MP1438
crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2761438
scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2761438
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2007
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2007
  text: June 2007
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle Medical physics (Lancaster)
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
SSID ssj0006350
Score 1.8229975
Snippet Purpose: To provide a scientific basis for setting sinogram modeling accuracy targets based on impact of such errors on image quality. Modeling inaccuracies in...
SourceID crossref
wiley
scitation
SourceType Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2571
SubjectTerms Computed tomography
Image scanners
Image sensors
Medical image artifacts
Medical image noise
Medical image quality
Medical image reconstruction
Medical imaging
Photon scattering
Photons
Title TU‐FF‐A4‐02: Impact of Sinogram Modeling Inaccuracies On Image Quality in X‐Ray CT Imaging Using the Alternating Minimization Algorithm
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2761438
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.2761438
Volume 34
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2473-4209
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006350
  issn: 0094-2405
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Pb9MwFH8qLWxcGJRNKwxkDcQtIs6fxh6nqiOi0tpVpZV6ixzHgUhbOqXtpN74BvAZ-SR7dtxKPYCQuNiy_BxZsf2ef37_AN4HYa50LB8n5ZlwgjzynVSGkeOmPktFnnOqXJNsIhqN2HzOxw34tPWFqeND7B7c9Mkw_FofcJHaLCRUG64juEMIHvjsEbQ83LdhE1qXk3h2tWPEKEtrDxQeaCVCaAML4fCPu8F74ugQpU6tAN-_qhpZEx_91yyfwzN7xSS9ek-8gIYq23AwtEr0NjwxVp9y-RJ-Tme_f_yKYyx6ARaud0EGxm2SLHLytSiN7RbR-dK01zoZlELKdSWQHyzJdYm0yI1IHYZjQ4qSzPEjE7Eh_anp02OMTQLBaybp3djHR2wPi7K4tS6g2PFtURWr77fHMIs_T_tfHJuhwZE0QvgZZEygPJPIMREnhq4SPJc61KjXlQyRHHVFpCgXrNvNWcSpnwls-RmiNIVAyfNPoFkuSnUKhMqQRoKmKkIOoRQXaZj5VLCcYy2Z14Hz7UIld3UgjqQGMCyhif3JHXi3W8K_UX0wS_ZnimQ41tWrfyV8DU-3doQuPYPmqlqrN_BY3q-KZfXW7ssHr5Tj-Q
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fT9swED91ZVt5YYNt4u-wAO0tIm6Sxka8VGwRFW1B0Ep9ixzHGZFoOrUFqW98A_iMfBLOjluJB9AkXmxZPkdWfL7z73x3Bjjwg0zpXD5OwlPh-FnoOYkMQsdNPJaILONUueaxibDbZYMBv6jA8TwWpswPsTC46Z1h5LXe4NogbXe59lxHdIcY3PfYB1jykY2Qv5d-X0b99kISozItQ1C4r28RAptZCIcfLga_0Ec1VDvlDfjLs6pRNtGX903zK6zYQyZpllyxChVVrMHnjr1GX4NPxu9TTr7BQ6__dP8YRVg0fSzc-hFpmcBJMsrIVV4Y7y2iX0zTceukVQgpb8cCJcKEnBdIi_KIlIk4ZiQvyAA_cilm5KRn-vQY45VA8KBJmjfW_IjtTl7kQxsEih1_R-N8ej38Dv3oT-_k1LFvNDiShghA_ZQJ1GgSZSYixcBVgmdSJxutNyRDLEddESrKBWs0MhZy6qUCW16KOE0hVKp7P6BajAq1DoTKgIaCJipEGaEUF0mQelSwjGMtWX0D9uYrFf8rU3HEJYRhMY3tT96A_cUavkX1y6zZ6xRx50JXm_9LuAu1016nHbdb3bMtWJ57Fbp0G6rT8a3agY_ybppPxj8tkz4DYC7n6Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TU%E2%80%90FF%E2%80%90A4%E2%80%9002%3A+Impact+of+Sinogram+Modeling+Inaccuracies+On+Image+Quality+in+X%E2%80%90Ray+CT+Imaging+Using+the+Alternating+Minimization+Algorithm&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Xie%2C+L&rft.au=Williamson%2C+J&rft.au=Politte%2C+D&rft.au=Whiting%2C+B&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.pub=American+Association+of+Physicists+in+Medicine&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6Part19&rft.spage=2571&rft.epage=2571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.2761438&rft.externalDBID=10.1118%252F1.2761438&rft.externalDocID=MP1438
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon