Who is Doing Taxonomy, Whereabouts, and Who Is Funding Them? A Practical Test of What Knowledge Graphs Can Tell Us about Taxonomic Research
What is the current state of taxonomy? Quentin Wheeler on his podcast "Species Hall of Fame" fears for taxonomy's future, whereas Lucas Joppa and colleagues have famously argued that we've never had so many taxonomists as we do now (Joppa et al. 2011). There have been global surv...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Biodiversity Information Science and Standards Vol. 8; p. 322 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sofia
Pensoft Publishers
04.10.2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2535-0897, 2535-0897 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | What is the current state of taxonomy? Quentin Wheeler on his podcast "Species Hall of Fame" fears for taxonomy's future, whereas Lucas Joppa and colleagues have famously argued that we've never had so many taxonomists as we do now (Joppa et al. 2011). There have been global surveys of taxonomic research (Grieneisen et al. 2014) but these rapidly go out of date, limiting their utility. Is there a way to have a “dashboard” that summarises the state of the field in terms of who is doing taxonomy, where it is being done, and who is funding it?
The immediate motivation for this talk comes from a tool I recently developed to track the recent taxonomic literature. Inspired by work by the late David Remsen on uBioRSS (Leary et al. 2007), I created BioRSS (Page 2021), which subscribes to Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds for a range of taxonomic journals. Papers listed in these RSS feeds and searches (here referred to as “works”) are aggregated and then tagged by geography and taxonomy, much as envisioned by Mindell et al. (2011). Based on the title and abstract, I attempt to classify the work by geographic and taxonomic scope. Geographic tagging uses the “Glasgow Geoparser,” which uses FlashText search (Singh 2017) to match words in the text to high-level geographic names obtained from Wikidata. Patrick Leary’s TaxonFinder is used to locate taxonomic names in the text, these are then matched to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) using the Global Names verifier. For each matched name, the path from taxon to root (the taxon’s “lineage”) is represented as an array of strings. The majority-rule consensus (Margush and McMorris 1981) of these paths determines what taxon the work is primarily about.
To navigate this data, I created a simple web site that provides a treemap view of the GBIF classification, a map, and a list of works ordered from most recent to oldest (Fig. 1). Exploring BioRSS, one gets a sense of in which countries most new species are discovered, and which taxonomic groups those discoveries fall into. How do we gain more insight into these patterns? One approach, sketched in Page (2023), would be to combine linked data from taxonomic name databases (via Life Science identifiers (LSIDs) for taxonomic names) with data from CrossRef of publications (via Digital Object Identifiers, DOIs) and ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) on people and their affiliations (via ORCIDs) into a single knowledge graph. By traversing this graph from name to publication to people to institution, we could gain insights into who is publishing taxonomic work, where they are based, and who is funding them.
ORCID helpfully provides their data in RDF in JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data (JSON-LD) format, which we can use to create a simple knowledge graph connecting people, places, publications, and organisations (Fig. 2). ORCID uses the schema.org vocabulary, which simplifies linking together data from disparate sources. Unfortunately, many ORCID profiles lack details on author publications. Even if details on funding and affiliation are included, ORCID lacks information about which works the author published when they had a given affiliation or funding. Data on funding and affiliation for individual publications is, however, often available from CrossRef. Like ORCID, CrossRef supports RDF, but instead of JSON-LD, CrossRef uses XML, and the RDF uses vocabularies such as FOAF (friend of a friend), PRISM (Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata), and BIBO (Bibliographic Ontology), which for the most part are being superseded by schema.org. Hence for this project I convert metadata from CrossRef into RDF using terms from schema.org (Fig. 3). Works are connected to authors (ideally identified by their ORCID), who in turn are connected to an organisation, ideally with a persistent identifier such as ROR (Research Organization Registry). Works are connected to funders, which may have a DOI from the Open Funder Registry, either directly, or via a grant number.
The final part of the knowledge graph is the connection between taxonomic names and works. One approach would be to use the RSS feeds harvested by BioRSS, which was the original motivation for this work. However, not all the articles BioRSS aggregates are taxonomic, so we would need to be able to reliably filter out non-taxonomic works. In the absence of such a filter I have used lists of recent taxonomic names and publications from Page (2023). Using the DOI for each taxonomic publication, we can connect the taxonomic names to information on authors and funders.
The talk will discuss the construction of this knowledge graph, lessons learnt along the way, and what it tells us about taxonomists and their funders. The talk will also discuss strategies for the inevitable gap-filling required to flesh out the knowledge graph. Preliminary results reveal that information on author affiliations and funding is often not recorded in either ORCID or CrossRef, which means we will either have to use proprietary databases (such as Dimensions), or scrape it from the Web. The latter approach is likely to benefit from recent developments in machine learning, for example using Large Language Models (LLMs) to parse the acknowledgements section of a paper to extract details on funders and grants. Prospects for these methods will be discussed. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | What is the current state of taxonomy? Quentin Wheeler on his podcast "Species Hall of Fame" fears for taxonomy's future, whereas Lucas Joppa and colleagues have famously argued that we've never had so many taxonomists as we do now (Joppa et al. 2011). There have been global surveys of taxonomic research (Grieneisen et al. 2014) but these rapidly go out of date, limiting their utility. Is there a way to have a “dashboard” that summarises the state of the field in terms of who is doing taxonomy, where it is being done, and who is funding it? The immediate motivation for this talk comes from a tool I recently developed to track the recent taxonomic literature. Inspired by work by the late David Remsen on uBioRSS (Leary et al. 2007), I created BioRSS (Page 2021), which subscribes to Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds for a range of taxonomic journals. Papers listed in these RSS feeds and searches (here referred to as “works”) are aggregated and then tagged by geography and taxonomy, much as envisioned by Mindell et al. (2011). Based on the title and abstract, I attempt to classify the work by geographic and taxonomic scope. Geographic tagging uses the “Glasgow Geoparser,” which uses FlashText search (Singh 2017) to match words in the text to high-level geographic names obtained from Wikidata. Patrick Leary’s TaxonFinder is used to locate taxonomic names in the text, these are then matched to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) using the Global Names verifier. For each matched name, the path from taxon to root (the taxon’s “lineage”) is represented as an array of strings. The majority-rule consensus (Margush and McMorris 1981) of these paths determines what taxon the work is primarily about. To navigate this data, I created a simple web site that provides a treemap view of the GBIF classification, a map, and a list of works ordered from most recent to oldest (Fig. 1). Exploring BioRSS, one gets a sense of in which countries most new species are discovered, and which taxonomic groups those discoveries fall into. How do we gain more insight into these patterns? One approach, sketched in Page (2023), would be to combine linked data from taxonomic name databases (via Life Science identifiers (LSIDs) for taxonomic names) with data from CrossRef of publications (via Digital Object Identifiers, DOIs) and ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) on people and their affiliations (via ORCIDs) into a single knowledge graph. By traversing this graph from name to publication to people to institution, we could gain insights into who is publishing taxonomic work, where they are based, and who is funding them. ORCID helpfully provides their data in RDF in JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data (JSON-LD) format, which we can use to create a simple knowledge graph connecting people, places, publications, and organisations (Fig. 2). ORCID uses the schema.org vocabulary, which simplifies linking together data from disparate sources. Unfortunately, many ORCID profiles lack details on author publications. Even if details on funding and affiliation are included, ORCID lacks information about which works the author published when they had a given affiliation or funding. Data on funding and affiliation for individual publications is, however, often available from CrossRef. Like ORCID, CrossRef supports RDF, but instead of JSON-LD, CrossRef uses XML, and the RDF uses vocabularies such as FOAF (friend of a friend), PRISM (Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata), and BIBO (Bibliographic Ontology), which for the most part are being superseded by schema.org. Hence for this project I convert metadata from CrossRef into RDF using terms from schema.org (Fig. 3). Works are connected to authors (ideally identified by their ORCID), who in turn are connected to an organisation, ideally with a persistent identifier such as ROR (Research Organization Registry). Works are connected to funders, which may have a DOI from the Open Funder Registry, either directly, or via a grant number. The final part of the knowledge graph is the connection between taxonomic names and works. One approach would be to use the RSS feeds harvested by BioRSS, which was the original motivation for this work. However, not all the articles BioRSS aggregates are taxonomic, so we would need to be able to reliably filter out non-taxonomic works. In the absence of such a filter I have used lists of recent taxonomic names and publications from Page (2023). Using the DOI for each taxonomic publication, we can connect the taxonomic names to information on authors and funders. The talk will discuss the construction of this knowledge graph, lessons learnt along the way, and what it tells us about taxonomists and their funders. The talk will also discuss strategies for the inevitable gap-filling required to flesh out the knowledge graph. Preliminary results reveal that information on author affiliations and funding is often not recorded in either ORCID or CrossRef, which means we will either have to use proprietary databases (such as Dimensions), or scrape it from the Web. The latter approach is likely to benefit from recent developments in machine learning, for example using Large Language Models (LLMs) to parse the acknowledgements section of a paper to extract details on funders and grants. Prospects for these methods will be discussed. What is the current state of taxonomy? Quentin Wheeler on his podcast "Species Hall of Fame" fears for taxonomy's future, whereas Lucas Joppa and colleagues have famously argued that we've never had so many taxonomists as we do now (Joppa et al. 2011). There have been global surveys of taxonomic research (Grieneisen et al. 2014) but these rapidly go out of date, limiting their utility. Is there a way to have a “dashboard” that summarises the state of the field in terms of who is doing taxonomy, where it is being done, and who is funding it? The immediate motivation for this talk comes from a tool I recently developed to track the recent taxonomic literature. Inspired by work by the late David Remsen on uBioRSS (Leary et al. 2007), I created BioRSS (Page 2021), which subscribes to Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds for a range of taxonomic journals. Papers listed in these RSS feeds and searches (here referred to as “works”) are aggregated and then tagged by geography and taxonomy, much as envisioned by Mindell et al. (2011). Based on the title and abstract, I attempt to classify the work by geographic and taxonomic scope. Geographic tagging uses the “Glasgow Geoparser,” which uses FlashText search (Singh 2017) to match words in the text to high-level geographic names obtained from Wikidata. Patrick Leary’s TaxonFinder is used to locate taxonomic names in the text, these are then matched to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) using the Global Names verifier. For each matched name, the path from taxon to root (the taxon’s “lineage”) is represented as an array of strings. The majority-rule consensus (Margush and McMorris 1981) of these paths determines what taxon the work is primarily about. To navigate this data, I created a simple web site that provides a treemap view of the GBIF classification, a map, and a list of works ordered from most recent to oldest (Fig. 1). Exploring BioRSS, one gets a sense of in which countries most new species are discovered, and which taxonomic groups those discoveries fall into. How do we gain more insight into these patterns? One approach, sketched in Page (2023), would be to combine linked data from taxonomic name databases (via Life Science identifiers (LSIDs) for taxonomic names) with data from CrossRef of publications (via Digital Object Identifiers, DOIs) and ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) on people and their affiliations (via ORCIDs) into a single knowledge graph. By traversing this graph from name to publication to people to institution, we could gain insights into who is publishing taxonomic work, where they are based, and who is funding them. ORCID helpfully provides their data in RDF in JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data (JSON-LD) format, which we can use to create a simple knowledge graph connecting people, places, publications, and organisations (Fig. 2). ORCID uses the schema.org vocabulary, which simplifies linking together data from disparate sources. Unfortunately, many ORCID profiles lack details on author publications. Even if details on funding and affiliation are included, ORCID lacks information about which works the author published when they had a given affiliation or funding. Data on funding and affiliation for individual publications is, however, often available from CrossRef. Like ORCID, CrossRef supports RDF, but instead of JSON-LD, CrossRef uses XML, and the RDF uses vocabularies such as FOAF (friend of a friend), PRISM (Publishing Requirements for Industry Standard Metadata), and BIBO (Bibliographic Ontology), which for the most part are being superseded by schema.org. Hence for this project I convert metadata from CrossRef into RDF using terms from schema.org (Fig. 3). Works are connected to authors (ideally identified by their ORCID), who in turn are connected to an organisation, ideally with a persistent identifier such as ROR (Research Organization Registry). Works are connected to funders, which may have a DOI from the Open Funder Registry, either directly, or via a grant number. The final part of the knowledge graph is the connection between taxonomic names and works. One approach would be to use the RSS feeds harvested by BioRSS, which was the original motivation for this work. However, not all the articles BioRSS aggregates are taxonomic, so we would need to be able to reliably filter out non-taxonomic works. In the absence of such a filter I have used lists of recent taxonomic names and publications from Page (2023). Using the DOI for each taxonomic publication, we can connect the taxonomic names to information on authors and funders. The talk will discuss the construction of this knowledge graph, lessons learnt along the way, and what it tells us about taxonomists and their funders. The talk will also discuss strategies for the inevitable gap-filling required to flesh out the knowledge graph. Preliminary results reveal that information on author affiliations and funding is often not recorded in either ORCID or CrossRef, which means we will either have to use proprietary databases (such as Dimensions), or scrape it from the Web. The latter approach is likely to benefit from recent developments in machine learning, for example using Large Language Models (LLMs) to parse the acknowledgements section of a paper to extract details on funders and grants. Prospects for these methods will be discussed. |
| Author | Page, Roderic |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Roderic orcidid: 0000-0002-7101-9767 surname: Page fullname: Page, Roderic |
| BookMark | eNpd0U9LwzAYBvAgCs65o_cXvHiwM3_aJT2JTDeHgiITjyVr39qOLplJi-4z-KXNnIJ4SsL7480DzxHZN9YgISeMDoVK5cWi9n6ohkyoWMo90uOJSCIaJvt_7odk4P2SUspTztVI9cjnS2Wh9nBta_MKc_1hjV1tzuGlQod6YbvWn4M2BWzdzMOkM8W3rHB1CVfw6HTe1rluYI6-BVsGqFu4M_a9weIVYer0uvIw1iaIpoFnD99rf_-qc3hCj9rl1TE5KHXjcfBz9snz5GY-vo3uH6az8dV9lDMpZSSLhFJcpMgVL1CWWIxGtCgLWkqGGqVUqFIhw1Mg1yJNaZnEIuEpipipGEWfnO32rp1960LsbFX7PITTBm3nM8ESoRgVVAZ6-o8ubedMSBcUixWPuVJBRTuVO-u9wzJbu3ql3SZjNNu2k23byVS2a0d8ARhyg3c |
| Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019491 10.59350/ndtkv-6ve80 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.010 10.48550/arxiv.1711.00046 10.1093/biosci/biu035 10.1016/s0092-8240(81)90019-7 10.3897/bdj.11.e107914 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm109 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 8FE 8FH ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ LK8 M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.3897/biss.8.138477 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Biological Science Database (NC LIVE) ProQuest Databases ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Publicly Available Content ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: PIMPY name: ProQuest Publicly Available Content url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Ecology Geography |
| EISSN | 2535-0897 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_3897_biss_8_138477 |
| GroupedDBID | 2XV 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAYXX ADBBV AFFHD AFKRA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU CITATION H13 HCIFZ IAO IGS ITC K13 LK8 M7P M~E OK1 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQGLB PROAC XH6 ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7S9 L.6 PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1777-7d500eb9e282de7fed660dfd0f71eae778e89370f73e2a3990f543529e34184e3 |
| IEDL.DBID | PIMPY |
| ISSN | 2535-0897 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 17:45:09 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 11:42:49 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:59:39 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | false |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1777-7d500eb9e282de7fed660dfd0f71eae778e89370f73e2a3990f543529e34184e3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7101-9767 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/publiccontent/docview/3114824288?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PQID | 3114824288 |
| PQPubID | 2049297 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3153810307 proquest_journals_3114824288 crossref_primary_10_3897_biss_8_138477 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20241004 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-10-04 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2024 text: 20241004 day: 04 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Sofia |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Sofia |
| PublicationTitle | Biodiversity Information Science and Standards |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Pensoft Publishers |
| References | 138477_B11805720 138477_B11805699 138477_B11805671 138477_B11805662 138477_B11805690 138477_B11805738 138477_B11805708 138477_B11805681 |
| References_xml | – ident: 138477_B11805708 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019491 – ident: 138477_B11805690 doi: 10.59350/ndtkv-6ve80 – ident: 138477_B11805662 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.010 – ident: 138477_B11805720 doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1711.00046 – ident: 138477_B11805738 doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu035 – ident: 138477_B11805699 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8240(81)90019-7 – ident: 138477_B11805681 doi: 10.3897/bdj.11.e107914 – ident: 138477_B11805671 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm109 |
| SSID | ssj0002922868 |
| Score | 2.2698631 |
| Snippet | What is the current state of taxonomy? Quentin Wheeler on his podcast "Species Hall of Fame" fears for taxonomy's future, whereas Lucas Joppa and colleagues... What is the current state of taxonomy? Quentin Wheeler on his podcast " Species Hall of Fame " fears for taxonomy's future, whereas Lucas Joppa and colleagues... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 322 |
| SubjectTerms | Biodiversity computer software Funding geography industry Knowledge Linked Data Metadata motivation Names New species researchers species Taxonomy |
| Title | Who is Doing Taxonomy, Whereabouts, and Who Is Funding Them? A Practical Test of What Knowledge Graphs Can Tell Us about Taxonomic Research |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3114824288 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153810307 |
| Volume | 8 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2535-0897 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002922868 issn: 2535-0897 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Biological Science Database (NC LIVE) customDbUrl: eissn: 2535-0897 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002922868 issn: 2535-0897 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20210101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2535-0897 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002922868 issn: 2535-0897 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20210101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content customDbUrl: eissn: 2535-0897 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002922868 issn: 2535-0897 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20210101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6VXZC4UMpDLLSrQao4Nd08bedU9bELVcsqQlsop8iJJ2KlkpSmi-A39E93nEdRLz1xSxTLSTTjbz6Px58BtoUriWkGObEOiScomq-MiR1P5zn7hyDTpC6-nsr5XJ2fx0m3Pbruyip7TGyAulV7tnXbDMITU-U2Yz4JLI3n6KLU3uUvx54hZddauwM1HsHQCm-5Axgmx5-T73c5Fz_2fSVUK7XJkVpOMv67XbXrBQzS8n5ouo_MTbiZrf_fD30Ozzraifutn2zAGpUv4Mm0kaz--xJuvv2ocFnjUcWRDBf6T7PVYQcZqplU2trlegd1adC2O65xtmo2wyA72c893MdW9YjNjQv-UKwKtJLgeNIn7PCj1cWu8VCX3OLiAs9qbLrt37XMsa8BfAVns-ni8JPTHdPg5J6U0pEmcl3KYuLZmyFZkBHCNYVxC-mRJikVWVLEtwH5mgmRW0RM0vyYOIKqkILXMCirkt4AZrHIRCYDowMKhScylVMYRZQxMcqUq0bwobdQetmqcaQ8i7GmTK0pU5W2phzBZm-ctBuUdfrPFiN4f_eYh5NdI9ElVSvbJrKaZ4x8bx_u4h089ZnfNHV94SYMrq9WtAWP89_Xy_pqDMOD6Tz5MralpMm488NbOp7tnQ |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Nb9NAEB2VFAQX-gGIQGmnEuVUt_7cXR9QVbUNjZJGOaTQnszaOxaRil3qBuhv4L_wG5m146JeuPXAzZZXa2n2ed6b8ewswFvhSmKZQU6sQ-IARfOVMbHj6SxjfAgyderi41CORursLB4vwO92L4wtq2x9Yu2oTZnZHPluYIU784lSe5ffHHtqlP272h6h0cBiQDc_OGSr3vcPeX23fL93NDk4duanCjiZJ6V0pIlcl9KYONgwJHMyQrgmN24uPdIkpSLL4XwbkK-Zv908Yk3hx8QOX4UU8LwPYDFksLsdWBz3T8bnt1kdP_Z9JVTTzJO1gNxN2X47ascLmAbkXfK76_trQust_W-mWIanc-mM-w3WV2CBilV4dFS33b55Br8-fSlxWuFhyWyME_2z3q6xjUw3LIxt_XW1jbowaMf1K-zN6g09yB_K1z3cx6ZzE0MWJ2wKLHO0bc1x0CYd8YPt7V3hgS54xMUFnlZYT9u-a5phW8f4HE7vxRIvoFOUBb0ETGORilQGRgcUCk-kKqMwiihlcZcqV3XhXYuB5LLpKJJwJGbBkliwJCppwNKFtXb5k7ljqZK_a9-FzdvH7BLsfx5dUDmzYyLbt42996t_T7EBj48nJ8Nk2B8NXsMTn_VaXacYrkHn-mpGb-Bh9v16Wl2tz3GO8Pm-8fQHOlM7bQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who+is+Doing+Taxonomy%2C+Whereabouts%2C+and+Who+Is+Funding+Them%3F+A+Practical+Test+of+What+Knowledge+Graphs+Can+Tell+Us+about+Taxonomic+Research&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity+Information+Science+and+Standards&rft.au=Page%2C+Roderic&rft.date=2024-10-04&rft.issn=2535-0897&rft.eissn=2535-0897&rft.volume=8+p.e138477-&rft_id=info:doi/10.3897%2Fbiss.8.138477&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2535-0897&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2535-0897&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2535-0897&client=summon |