Transcendental Philosophy and Post-Neo-Kantianism. On the Continuity of the Problem History of Transcendental Systematics in the 20th Century
This article aims to make a contribution to the problematic history of the transcendental philosophical tradition up to the present day. At the centre is the question of the continuity of transcendental philosophical research in the 20th century with regard to the situation before and after the Seco...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Vestnik Rossiĭskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serii͡a︡ Filosofii͡a Jg. 28; H. 3; S. 697 - 716 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch Deutsch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
15.12.2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 2313-2302, 2408-8900 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | This article aims to make a contribution to the problematic history of the transcendental philosophical tradition up to the present day. At the centre is the question of the continuity of transcendental philosophical research in the 20th century with regard to the situation before and after the Second World War. The decisive point of reference here is Neo-Kantianism. Canonical Neo-Kantianism research defines it on the basis of its core phase between 1895 and 1912, which it precedes with an emergence and ends with a dissolution. There is no consensus among researchers when it comes to determining and dating the emergence and end of Neo-Kantianism. However, the majority of researchers agree that the end of Neo-Kantianism was between 1918 and 1945, marking a break in this philosophical tradition. Nevertheless, there is also a research perspective that allows a post-history to follow the core phase of Neo-Kantianism. However, the term Neo-Neo-Kantianism proposed for this is rejected by the majority of research in Neo-Kantianism. Kurt Walter Zeidler and Andrej Noras have taken up research into the post-history of Neo-Kantianism in different ways. On the one hand, Zeidler makes “Post-Neo-Kantian systematics” the guiding principle of his analysis with a view to continuity within the Neo-Kantian school of realist criticism. Andrej Noras, on the other hand, interprets the ontological interpretation of Kant in the 1920s and its critique of epistemologically orientated classical Neo-Kantianism as Post-Neo-Kantianism, which he follows with Neo-Neo-Kantianism as a critique of the critique of Post-Neo-Kantianism. The two authors thus argue in favour of a continuity of the transcendental philosophical tradition in the 20th century, whereby they make the supposed end of neo-Kantianism the starting point of their investigations. In this article, the terms Neo-Kantianism, Neo-Neo-Kantianism and Post-Neo-Kantianism will be clarified and contextualised within Neo-Kantian research. On the basis of this presentation, a perspective for the transcendental philosophical systematics of the 21st century will then be developed, which productively appropriates the 20th century as its problem-historical foundation. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This article aims to make a contribution to the problematic history of the transcendental philosophical tradition up to the present day. At the centre is the question of the continuity of transcendental philosophical research in the 20th century with regard to the situation before and after the Second World War. The decisive point of reference here is Neo-Kantianism. Canonical Neo-Kantianism research defines it on the basis of its core phase between 1895 and 1912, which it precedes with an emergence and ends with a dissolution. There is no consensus among researchers when it comes to determining and dating the emergence and end of Neo-Kantianism. However, the majority of researchers agree that the end of Neo-Kantianism was between 1918 and 1945, marking a break in this philosophical tradition. Nevertheless, there is also a research perspective that allows a post-history to follow the core phase of Neo-Kantianism. However, the term Neo-Neo-Kantianism proposed for this is rejected by the majority of research in Neo-Kantianism. Kurt Walter Zeidler and Andrej Noras have taken up research into the post-history of Neo-Kantianism in different ways. On the one hand, Zeidler makes “Post-Neo-Kantian systematics” the guiding principle of his analysis with a view to continuity within the Neo-Kantian school of realist criticism. Andrej Noras, on the other hand, interprets the ontological interpretation of Kant in the 1920s and its critique of epistemologically orientated classical Neo-Kantianism as Post-Neo-Kantianism, which he follows with Neo-Neo-Kantianism as a critique of the critique of Post-Neo-Kantianism. The two authors thus argue in favour of a continuity of the transcendental philosophical tradition in the 20th century, whereby they make the supposed end of neo-Kantianism the starting point of their investigations. In this article, the terms Neo-Kantianism, Neo-Neo-Kantianism and Post-Neo-Kantianism will be clarified and contextualised within Neo-Kantian research. On the basis of this presentation, a perspective for the transcendental philosophical systematics of the 21st century will then be developed, which productively appropriates the 20th century as its problem-historical foundation. |
| Author | Boch, Michael |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Michael orcidid: 0009-0007-9932-0790 surname: Boch fullname: Boch, Michael organization: University of Wuppertal |
| BookMark | eNpdkU1uFDEQRi0UJELIHbxg62C73G1bYoNGQCKiZKSEteX2D-Oox45sZ9GH4M7pmQEWrKr0qvRUqu89OsslB4Q-MnrFOYzwiQMDwoFywikXhCsCZNSSSDa-QedcUEWUpvRs7f9uvkOXrT1RSrlUfBj0Ofr9WG1uLmQfcrcz3u7SXFp53i3YZo-3pXVyFwr5YXNPNqe2v8L3GfddwJuyovyS-oJLPJJtLdMc9vg6tV7qEf-nf1haD3vbk2s4nTSc9h3erOOXunxAb6OdW7j8Uy_Qz29fHzfX5Pb--83myy1xTMJItBAQgqNeuygnBRpGMWhL5RgnEcAzxacwMW2nYRAyxCiZszRG5dXo-BThAt2cvL7YJ_Nc097WxRSbzBGU-svYuh45ByNdnJh3Y5AWhB2EVcCpHoCCVp6CX12fTy5XS2s1xH8-Rs0xKXP4vzn83xySMlwZMGtSZk0KXgHSqYsu |
| Cites_doi | 10.1515/9783110747379-020 10.30965/9783657776436 10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80017-9 10.17104/9783406703508 10.7203/REK.4.2.13750 10.1007/978-3-476-03893-7 10.3726/b16763 10.30965/9783969757260 10.1628/978-3-16-154175-9 10.1017/CBO9781139506717 10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-1-89-98 10.17104/9783406705830 10.3726/b17145 10.1515/kant-2023-2033 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722205.001.0001 10.1163/9789004501881_013 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
| DOI | 10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-697-716 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Philosophy |
| EISSN | 2408-8900 |
| EndPage | 716 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_7cfb1dc6e7a34a54a83209530398d03d 10_22363_2313_2302_2024_28_3_697_716 |
| GroupedDBID | AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1736-9443eec0d9cf7b83936459a076fb4e3d182beb19ab5547eff71ca0ff8d86c2bf3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2313-2302 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:52:32 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 29 21:18:43 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English German |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1736-9443eec0d9cf7b83936459a076fb4e3d182beb19ab5547eff71ca0ff8d86c2bf3 |
| ORCID | 0009-0007-9932-0790 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/7cfb1dc6e7a34a54a83209530398d03d |
| PageCount | 20 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7cfb1dc6e7a34a54a83209530398d03d crossref_primary_10_22363_2313_2302_2024_28_3_697_716 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-12-15 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-12-15 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2024 text: 2024-12-15 day: 15 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Vestnik Rossiĭskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serii͡a︡ Filosofii͡a |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
| References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref42 ref41 ref22 ref44 ref21 ref43 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref1 – ident: ref43 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1515/9783110747379-020 – ident: ref29 – ident: ref41 – ident: ref22 – ident: ref25 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.30965/9783657776436 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1016/S1874-5857(08)80017-9 – ident: ref27 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.17104/9783406703508 – ident: ref19 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.7203/REK.4.2.13750 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1007/978-3-476-03893-7 – ident: ref17 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.3726/b16763 – ident: ref15 – ident: ref30 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.30965/9783969757260 – ident: ref13 – ident: ref4 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1628/978-3-16-154175-9 – ident: ref2 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139506717 – ident: ref38 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-1-89-98 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.17104/9783406705830 – ident: ref42 – ident: ref21 – ident: ref23 – ident: ref26 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.3726/b17145 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1515/kant-2023-2033 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722205.001.0001 – ident: ref8 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1163/9789004501881_013 – ident: ref18 – ident: ref16 – ident: ref10 – ident: ref35 – ident: ref33 – ident: ref14 – ident: ref31 |
| SSID | ssj0002782559 |
| Score | 2.2771935 |
| Snippet | This article aims to make a contribution to the problematic history of the transcendental philosophical tradition up to the present day. At the centre is the... |
| SourceID | doaj crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
| StartPage | 697 |
| SubjectTerms | достоверность история идей логика неокантианство теория познания феноменология |
| Title | Transcendental Philosophy and Post-Neo-Kantianism. On the Continuity of the Problem History of Transcendental Systematics in the 20th Century |
| URI | https://doaj.org/article/7cfb1dc6e7a34a54a83209530398d03d |
| Volume | 28 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2408-8900 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002782559 issn: 2313-2302 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20080101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3LSgMxFA0iIm7EJ9YXWbgNTSbpJFmqKIJSCyp0FyYvrIuptFXwI_xnb5Jaixs3bjNMGHLO3HtCwjkInUlqI3c9QYSjnAgFddDaCL87NMcQtVDUZ5_ZO9nvq-FQD5aivtKdsGIPXBauK120zLs6yIaLpicaoGDySKNcK0-5T9UXVM_SZuqlHKclrZyT5RgnoLOrdXSW7j1XvObdxSCQpBKkSjcEai2JTLHnS_1pycY_95vrLbQ5F4r4vHzgNlrxYQdtDL6TBz520WfuMy5n2IKExj_PcNN6nGJ4ST-MyS0sHpAg2R3i-xaD4sPJk2rUvoECx-OYRwYlWAYX25A8_Gv6h4Xn8xSPyjQVnT3jy9K29tDT9dXj5Q2ZpysQxySviRaCh-Co1y5KCzopHUjqhso6WhG4h42HhUKuGwuKQ4YYJXMNjVF5VbsKEN5Hq-24DQcIa-ucY8xaz5wIulEeykQILAJUQVnaQb3vNTWvxUTDwOYjY2ESFiZhYRIWplKGG8DCABYddJEAWLyTrLDzABDEzAli_iLI4X9McoQ2MlNYRVjvGK3OJm_hBK2599loOjnN3PsCNGzalg |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcendental+Philosophy+and+Post-Neo-Kantianism.+On+the+Continuity+of+the+Problem+History+of+Transcendental+Systematics+in+the+20th+Century&rft.jtitle=Vestnik+Rossi%C4%ADskogo+universiteta+druzhby+narodov.+Serii%CD%A1a%EF%B8%A1+Filosofii%CD%A1a&rft.au=Michael+Boch&rft.date=2024-12-15&rft.pub=Peoples%E2%80%99+Friendship+University+of+Russia+%28RUDN+University%29&rft.issn=2313-2302&rft.eissn=2408-8900&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=697&rft.epage=716&rft_id=info:doi/10.22363%2F2313-2302-2024-28-3-697-716&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_7cfb1dc6e7a34a54a83209530398d03d |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2313-2302&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2313-2302&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2313-2302&client=summon |