Patient satisfaction in shoulder arthroscopy: telemedicine vs. clinic follow-up visits

The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder proc...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Clinics in shoulder and elbow Ročník 25; číslo 2; s. 106 - 111
Hlavní autoři: Cha, Elliot D K, Suraci, Corey, Petrosky, Daniel, Welsh, Rebeca, Reynolds, Gustin, Scharf, Michael, Brutico, Joseph, SantaLucia, Gabriella, Choi, Joseph
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Korea (South) 대한견주관절학회 01.06.2022
Témata:
ISSN:2288-8721, 2383-8337, 2288-8721
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural setting. Patients were prospectively enrolled using the following exclusion criteria: <18 years, open procedures, and non-compliance follow-up at 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients completed a 13-question satisfaction survey, while telemedicine patients completed an additional, separate seven-question survey. Patients who switched groups completed a four-question prompt to determine the reasons for switching. Differences between groups were evaluated by either Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The study enrolled 32 patients, with five patients following up by telemedicine and 27 in-person. Age and distance from clinic were similar between patients who were assigned to the telemedicine group, completed the telemedicine visit, and opted for in-person visits (all p>0.05). Patient satisfaction did not vary significantly based on care by the surgeon, concerns being addressed, thoroughness of visit, overall clinical assessment at a prior visit, and improvements in pain and physical function (all p>0.05). Among patients who opted out of telemedicine visits, the most common reason was a preference to meet in-person but these patients agreed that telemedicine visits are a good idea. Regardless of type of follow-up, individuals reported similar levels of satisfaction with treatment during the visit and improvements in pain and physical function.
AbstractList The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural setting. Patients were prospectively enrolled using the following exclusion criteria: <18 years, open procedures, and non-compliance follow-up at 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients completed a 13-question satisfaction survey, while telemedicine patients completed an additional, separate seven-question survey. Patients who switched groups completed a four-question prompt to determine the reasons for switching. Differences between groups were evaluated by either Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The study enrolled 32 patients, with five patients following up by telemedicine and 27 in-person. Age and distance from clinic were similar between patients who were assigned to the telemedicine group, completed the telemedicine visit, and opted for in-person visits (all p>0.05). Patient satisfaction did not vary significantly based on care by the surgeon, concerns being addressed, thoroughness of visit, overall clinical assessment at a prior visit, and improvements in pain and physical function (all p>0.05). Among patients who opted out of telemedicine visits, the most common reason was a preference to meet in-person but these patients agreed that telemedicine visits are a good idea. Regardless of type of follow-up, individuals reported similar levels of satisfaction with treatment during the visit and improvements in pain and physical function.
Background: The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural setting. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled using the following exclusion criteria: 0.05). Patient satisfaction did not vary significantly based on care by the surgeon, concerns being addressed, thoroughness of visit, overall clinical assessment at a prior visit, and improvements in pain and physical function (all p>0.05). Among patients who opted out of telemedicine visits, the most common reason was a preference to meet in-person but these patients agreed that telemedicine visits are a good idea. Conclusions: Regardless of type of follow-up, individuals reported similar levels of satisfaction with treatment during the visit and improvements in pain and physical function. KCI Citation Count: 0
The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural setting.BACKGROUNDThe use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder patients. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine for postoperative clinic visits following arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural setting.Patients were prospectively enrolled using the following exclusion criteria: <18 years, open procedures, and non-compliance follow-up at 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients completed a 13-question satisfaction survey, while telemedicine patients completed an additional, separate seven-question survey. Patients who switched groups completed a four-question prompt to determine the reasons for switching. Differences between groups were evaluated by either Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test.METHODSPatients were prospectively enrolled using the following exclusion criteria: <18 years, open procedures, and non-compliance follow-up at 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients completed a 13-question satisfaction survey, while telemedicine patients completed an additional, separate seven-question survey. Patients who switched groups completed a four-question prompt to determine the reasons for switching. Differences between groups were evaluated by either Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test.The study enrolled 32 patients, with five patients following up by telemedicine and 27 in person. Age and distance from clinic were similar between patients who were assigned to the telemedicine group, completed the telemedicine visit, and opted for in-person visits (all p>0.05). Patient satisfaction did not vary significantly based on care by the surgeon, concerns being addressed, thoroughness of visit, overall clinical assessment at a prior visit, and improvements in pain and physical function (all p>0.05). Among patients who opted out of telemedicine visits, the most common reason was a preference to meet in-person but these patients agreed that telemedicine visits are a good idea.RESULTSThe study enrolled 32 patients, with five patients following up by telemedicine and 27 in person. Age and distance from clinic were similar between patients who were assigned to the telemedicine group, completed the telemedicine visit, and opted for in-person visits (all p>0.05). Patient satisfaction did not vary significantly based on care by the surgeon, concerns being addressed, thoroughness of visit, overall clinical assessment at a prior visit, and improvements in pain and physical function (all p>0.05). Among patients who opted out of telemedicine visits, the most common reason was a preference to meet in-person but these patients agreed that telemedicine visits are a good idea.Regardless of type of follow-up, individuals reported similar levels of satisfaction with treatment during the visit and improvements in pain and physical function.CONCLUSIONSRegardless of type of follow-up, individuals reported similar levels of satisfaction with treatment during the visit and improvements in pain and physical function.
Author Scharf, Michael
Welsh, Rebeca
Petrosky, Daniel
Brutico, Joseph
Suraci, Corey
Cha, Elliot D K
Choi, Joseph
Reynolds, Gustin
SantaLucia, Gabriella
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Elliot D K
  surname: Cha
  fullname: Cha, Elliot D K
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Corey
  surname: Suraci
  fullname: Suraci, Corey
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Petrosky
  fullname: Petrosky, Daniel
  organization: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rebeca
  surname: Welsh
  fullname: Welsh, Rebeca
  organization: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Gustin
  surname: Reynolds
  fullname: Reynolds, Gustin
  organization: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Scharf
  fullname: Scharf, Michael
  organization: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Joseph
  surname: Brutico
  fullname: Brutico, Joseph
  organization: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Gabriella
  surname: SantaLucia
  fullname: SantaLucia, Gabriella
  organization: Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Joseph
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Joseph
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002845172$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNpNkM1LwzAYxoNM3Jw7e5Mc9dDapB9JvI3hx2CgyPQa0uStC-uS2rST_fcWp-Dp9xx-vLzPc45GzjtA6JIkcZ4KdqttgJgmlMRJUhBxgiaUch5xRsnoXx6jWQi2TPI0ZQXj5AyN0zzPcprxCXp_UZ0F1-EwMFRKd9Y7bB0OG9_XBlqs2m7T-qB9c7jDHdSwA2O1dYD3Ica6ts5qXPm69l9R3-C9DbYLF-i0UnWA2S-n6O3hfr14ilbPj8vFfBVpwoiIUlWWw-tEsIQYASXJoWBGUF2YjBuuBRV5bkAxMfQFwpguIBOcpQBZYqhIp-jmeNe1ldxqK72yP_zwctvK-et6KYXgCc3o4F4f3ab1nz2ETu5s0FDXyoHvg6RFkQ1mQbJBvfpV-3KoK5vW7lR7kH-7pd-WiHH7
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
ACYCR
DOI 10.5397/cise.2021.00619
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2288-8721
EndPage 111
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9980242
35545248
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
NPM
.UV
7X8
5-W
8JR
9ZL
ACYCR
EF.
GROUPED_DOAJ
JDI
KVFHK
OK1
RPM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1719-3abb06119701d9eb15e67d92c6d48d8c92955dea79397e177c6e49873ee40d293
ISSN 2288-8721
2383-8337
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:49:32 EST 2023
Thu Jul 10 23:39:08 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:25:40 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Telemedicine, Shoulder, Arthroscopy
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1719-3abb06119701d9eb15e67d92c6d48d8c92955dea79397e177c6e49873ee40d293
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
http://www.cisejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5397/cise.2021.00619
OpenAccessLink https://www.cisejournal.org/upload/pdf/cise-2021-00619.pdf
PMID 35545248
PQID 2664802614
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9980242
proquest_miscellaneous_2664802614
pubmed_primary_35545248
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20220601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2022
  text: 20220601
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Clinics in shoulder and elbow
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Shoulder Elb
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher 대한견주관절학회
Publisher_xml – name: 대한견주관절학회
SSID ssib053376781
ssj0001510726
Score 2.1833184
Snippet The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic shoulder...
Background: The use of telemedicine for postoperative visits is increasing, especially in rural areas. Few studies have investigated its use for arthroscopic...
SourceID nrf
proquest
pubmed
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 106
SubjectTerms 정형외과학
Title Patient satisfaction in shoulder arthroscopy: telemedicine vs. clinic follow-up visits
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545248
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2664802614
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002845172
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 대한 견주관절 학회지, 2022, 25(2), , pp.106-111
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2288-8721
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001510726
  issn: 2288-8721
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwELa6CwcuCMSrsKwMIqcoIW_b3NJuEQhR9bBAb1HiOLTqKqmSbXf_Jv-IsZ2maaWVlgMXy7Isx_F8Gs_YM58R-sD9NC2EACcnc30rIDyymBO4FqeFR1IwuP3cUY9NkOmUzudsNhj82eXCbK9IWdLbW7b-r6KGNhC2TJ39B3F3g0ID1EHoUILYobyX4GeaKdVsenkL8lSjWcjXrEUtaY0WksOyWiu2p2shI8j1Dbu5bew2WdIsACHVjbVZmzL_XBM-dZwGqktzOGyZm-Iqq7pDcR0OYl7Y32x5q9_ddlS1Ulh1ypf7c3KZ6C6DhWFiq-6UX8k-NX_B_r3oH0-AZ9uFUSlAGZORQccyamNyYbDQYGNjEhsjz4ihMjZi3xjplkD1gRbHoHTXmalKDCPs1SLYGL5FfU0VYwvd5gEIKNG51q0qdp2ot6u3Kv14wwh9RUQsHzCxYfauDPNrVfgBNffRlnlAzr3iy-R3lazqBFyQrwn4r9LuOUEPPBIy2vPydeI6-NuefvKw_Q9NOCVn8vFoHmDvlHVxt--jbKDLJ-hx67zgWIPuKRqI8hn62QIO9wGHlyXeIQP3APcJ9-GGAW5Yww13cMMabs_Rj8-Ty_EXq32tw-IucZnlp1kGk3YZcdycgQkQiojkzONRHtCccrDDwzAXKWwIjAiXgFoQAaPEFyJwcrA6X6DTsirFK4TDFH4_40UQiiCgWcRYwTnxOBOKntAfovewLmrh7xbAEL3bLVsCKlPeg6WlqDZNAjYpjOKBYTpEL_V6JmvN7ZJI8zv0Avr6Pp94gx7tIX-GTq_rjXiLHvItLHd9jk7InJ4r8UM5nX3_C1YJkUM
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient+satisfaction+in+shoulder+arthroscopy%3A+telemedicine+vs.+clinic+follow-up+visits&rft.jtitle=Clinics+in+shoulder+and+elbow&rft.au=Elliot+D.K.+Cha&rft.au=Corey+Suraci&rft.au=Daniel+Petrosky&rft.au=Rebeca+Welsh&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EA%B2%AC%EC%A3%BC%EA%B4%80%EC%A0%88%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2383-8337&rft.eissn=2288-8721&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=111&rft_id=info:doi/10.5397%2Fcise.2021.00619&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9980242
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2288-8721&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2288-8721&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2288-8721&client=summon