Rational Choice and Its Limits
This Article asks the fundamental question of whether the concept of a market-oriented (economic) order can be reconciled with the idea of democracy from the perspective of rational choice approaches to the law. Europe has been facing great economic challenges for the past years—sovereign debt; fisc...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | German law journal Ročník 17; číslo 5; s. 763 - 778 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autor: | |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
01.10.2016
|
| ISSN: | 2071-8322, 2071-8322 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | This Article asks the fundamental question of whether the concept of a market-oriented (economic) order can be reconciled with the idea of democracy from the perspective of rational choice approaches to the law. Europe has been facing great economic challenges for the past years—sovereign debt; fiscal and monetary policy; financial market regulation; trade and investment agreements. Some observers argue that prioritizing an economic rationale in the policy response to these challenges comes at the expense of democracy by undermining its most vital preconditions (such as equality and solidarity), while their antagonists state that in fact democratic decision-making is undermining financial stability and long-term welfare of societies. This Article will establish that both positions contribute important insights and yet display too narrow a field of vision. Combining the arguments puts the cart before the horse: Democratic decision-making undermines, among other things, financial stability—and thus long-term welfare of societies—because it follows a logic that is primarily economic. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This Article asks the fundamental question of whether the concept of a market-oriented (economic) order can be reconciled with the idea of democracy from the perspective of rational choice approaches to the law. Europe has been facing great economic challenges for the past years—sovereign debt; fiscal and monetary policy; financial market regulation; trade and investment agreements. Some observers argue that prioritizing an economic rationale in the policy response to these challenges comes at the expense of democracy by undermining its most vital preconditions (such as equality and solidarity), while their antagonists state that in fact democratic decision-making is undermining financial stability and long-term welfare of societies. This Article will establish that both positions contribute important insights and yet display too narrow a field of vision. Combining the arguments puts the cart before the horse: Democratic decision-making undermines, among other things, financial stability—and thus long-term welfare of societies—because it follows a logic that is primarily economic. |
| Author | Towfigh, Emanuel V. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Emanuel V. surname: Towfigh fullname: Towfigh, Emanuel V. |
| BookMark | eNp9j01LxDAQQIOs4O7qD_Ai_QPVmaRpukcp6i4UhF09l8lHMdJtJcnFf2-rHkTB0wwP3gxvxRbDODjGLhGuEVDdHDgorATnAMCxkOKELWeUz2zxYz9jqxhfAYSSvFyyqz0lPw7UZ_XL6I3LaLDZLsWs8Uef4jk77aiP7uJ7rtnz_d1Tvc2bx4ddfdvkBktIuRXaFbpwUlXlZlNVrkBLnbIaYYKCkzTTf-qcJnRWK80BhQEkA52UVog1w6-7JowxBte1b8EfKby3CO0c2P4JnBz1yzE-fdakQL7_x_wAbzZUNA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1590_s0034_759020240304x crossref_primary_10_1590_s0034_759020240304 |
| Cites_doi | 10.5962/p.388731 10.1628/978-3-16-153698-4 10.1257/0002828043052187 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9 10.1177/0146167204264004 10.1257/jep.7.2.159 10.7551/mitpress/2604.003.0006 10.1038/nature02043 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 10.4337/9781783471676 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00072-3 10.1515/9783110506006-003 10.1515/9781400822300 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.06.002 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01080.x 10.1002/9781119202400 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00117.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
| DOI | 10.1017/S2071832200021453 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Law |
| EISSN | 2071-8322 |
| EndPage | 778 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1017_S2071832200021453 |
| GroupedDBID | .4L 09C 09D 0R~ 2-G 2WC 6DY AABWE AACLI AAGFV AALKF AAOIO AAPYI AASVR AAYXX ABACO ABFRF ABGDZ ABXHF ACAJB ACDLN ACFCP ACGFO ACMJI ADKIL ADUOI ADVJH AEBAK AEFWE AEGXH AFACB AFKQG AFKRZ AFLVW AFZFC AGABE AGHGI AGJUD AGTDA AHRGI AIAGR AJPFC AKMAY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOWSX BBLKV BHRNT CCQAD CITATION CJCSC DOHLZ FM. FRJ FRS GCT GROUPED_DOAJ HCSNT HISYW HOCAJ HOVLH IKXGN IPYYG JHPGK JOSPZ JRMXA LGEZI LMKDQ LOTEE LXHRH M~E NADUK NXXTH OK1 P2P PQQKQ RCA RHO ROL RWL RXW TAA TAC TAF TR2 UVLOZ W2G WFFJZ X6Y |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c160t-d3be4b4e57869988e41daf7db104e532a5c071afeba1edb7b2013c01ac0f55d33 |
| ISSN | 2071-8322 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 18 21:16:10 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:44:41 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c160t-d3be4b4e57869988e41daf7db104e532a5c071afeba1edb7b2013c01ac0f55d33 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1017_S2071832200021453 crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_S2071832200021453 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2016-10-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2016 text: 2016-10-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | German law journal |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| References | S2071832200021453_ref25 S2071832200021453_ref26 S2071832200021453_ref28 S2071832200021453_ref29 S2071832200021453_ref1 S2071832200021453_ref2 S2071832200021453_ref3 S2071832200021453_ref4 S2071832200021453_ref5 Levinson (S2071832200021453_ref8) 1999; 85 Bowles (S2071832200021453_ref42) 1998; 36 Nordhaus (S2071832200021453_ref24) 1996; 169 S2071832200021453_ref9 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.3 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.2 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.5 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.4 Falk (S2071832200021453_ref37) 2013; 340 Titmuss (S2071832200021453_ref35) 1997; 14 S2071832200021453_ref31 S2071832200021453_ref10 S2071832200021453_ref11 S2071832200021453_ref33 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.1 S2071832200021453_ref12 S2071832200021453_ref34 S2071832200021453_ref13 S2071832200021453_ref14 Buchanan (S2071832200021453_ref27) 1988; 74 S2071832200021453_ref36 Pildes (S2071832200021453_ref6) 1998; 50 S2071832200021453_ref15 S2071832200021453_ref16 S2071832200021453_ref38 S2071832200021453_ref39 S2071832200021453_ref17 S2071832200021453_ref18 S2071832200021453_ref19 Ortiz (S2071832200021453_ref7) 2000; 753 Gneezy (S2071832200021453_ref32) 2000; 29 Carter (S2071832200021453_ref43) 1991; 5 S2071832200021453_ref41 S2071832200021453_ref20 S2071832200021453_ref21 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref40.1 cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref40.2 S2071832200021453_ref22 S2071832200021453_ref23 |
| References_xml | – ident: S2071832200021453_ref33 doi: 10.5962/p.388731 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref5 doi: 10.1628/978-3-16-153698-4 – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.3 doi: 10.1257/0002828043052187 – volume: 14 year: 1997 ident: S2071832200021453_ref35 publication-title: Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.2 doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref10 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref12 – volume: 753 start-page: 754 year: 2000 ident: S2071832200021453_ref7 article-title: Duopoly Versus Autonomy: How the Two-Party System Harms the Major Parties publication-title: Colum. L. Rev. – volume: 85 year: 1999 ident: S2071832200021453_ref8 publication-title: Market Failures and Failures of Markets – ident: S2071832200021453_ref9 – volume: 36 year: 1998 ident: S2071832200021453_ref42 publication-title: Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions – ident: S2071832200021453_ref3 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref39 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref31 doi: 10.1177/0146167204264004 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref41 doi: 10.1257/jep.7.2.159 – volume: 29 year: 2000 ident: S2071832200021453_ref32 publication-title: A Fine Is a Price – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/2604.003.0006 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref19 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref21 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref15 – volume: 5 year: 1991 ident: S2071832200021453_ref43 publication-title: Are Economists Different, and If So, Why? – ident: S2071832200021453_ref13 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref25 – volume: 169 year: 1996 ident: S2071832200021453_ref24 article-title: The Political Business Cycle publication-title: Rev. Econ. Stud. – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.5 doi: 10.1038/nature02043 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref28 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref36 doi: 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref2 doi: 10.4337/9781783471676 – volume: 74 year: 1988 ident: S2071832200021453_ref27 publication-title: Is Public Choice Immoral? The Case for the ‘Nobel’ Lie – volume: 340 year: 2013 ident: S2071832200021453_ref37 publication-title: Morals and Markets – ident: S2071832200021453_ref34 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref4 – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref40.2 doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00072-3 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref38 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref1 doi: 10.1515/9783110506006-003 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref11 doi: 10.1515/9781400822300 – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref40.1 doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.06.002 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref23 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01080.x – ident: S2071832200021453_ref16 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref18 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref17 doi: 10.1002/9781119202400 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref14 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref22 – ident: S2071832200021453_ref29 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00117.x – ident: S2071832200021453_ref20 – ident: #cr-split#-S2071832200021453_ref30.4 – volume: 50 year: 1998 ident: S2071832200021453_ref6 publication-title: Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process – ident: S2071832200021453_ref26 |
| SSID | ssj0037526 |
| Score | 1.9712877 |
| Snippet | This Article asks the fundamental question of whether the concept of a market-oriented (economic) order can be reconciled with the idea of democracy from the... |
| SourceID | crossref |
| SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database |
| StartPage | 763 |
| Title | Rational Choice and Its Limits |
| Volume | 17 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAEN databaseName: Cambridge University Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 2071-8322 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0037526 issn: 2071-8322 databaseCode: IKXGN dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/login providerName: Cambridge University Press – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2071-8322 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0037526 issn: 2071-8322 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NS8MwFA9uevAifuL8GD14clTapmnao4z5ATpEpuw2kjTFwejG2rmd_Nt9adquOAfu4KWUkD6a_prfe_l6P4SuIgZ-PMSBSUPOTKWHZAYk9EwRYC90WKgyqmRiE7Tb9fv94CVX1EsyOQEax_5iEUz-FWooA7DV0dkN4C6NQgHcA-hwBdjh-ifgX4vpvfbHeJgfB3hME32UKakGo_eKlePWiM1bVct6zjka6tWXDlSZyVHr_aY6QWB75VaznEcciCJM1XE15f9SVhAhrQBOKqxWcJB2kFRr7qxwb56wSZlWlq0sHRvBS0dTLK7_8D_lrkC94YwOVkzU0LZDSaBI6_mrUzhaTEmmple2pVi0VhnBf5qohB2V-KG3j_bywN-41YAdoC0ZH6LaE5sfoWYBmaEhMwAyAyAzNGTH6O2u02s_mLluhSlsz0rNEHPpclcCGXowmvWla4csgs4AQ19JsMOIgLdjkeTMliGnHFDDwrKZsCICHQefoHo8juUpMrAEAxGPiHR9NxCMe7bwA46FgIGw77kNZBXNGog8qbvSFhkN1n7MBrouH5nojCbrK59tUvkc7S7_vwtUT6czeYl2xGc6TKbNDLtvoEo3MQ |
| linkProvider | ISSN International Centre |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rational+Choice+and+Its+Limits&rft.jtitle=German+law+journal&rft.au=Towfigh%2C+Emanuel+V.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.issn=2071-8322&rft.eissn=2071-8322&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS2071832200021453&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1017_S2071832200021453 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2071-8322&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2071-8322&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2071-8322&client=summon |