A Comparative Study of Computer-Based Document Manipulation Techniques

Techniques to aid the manipulation of a computer based document were tested by a group of 38 novice users. The subjects were given a period of time to browse the document, and were subsequently given a set of goal related tasks in a question/answer session. The techniques tested were sequential pagi...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Hypermedia Ročník 6; číslo 2; s. 87 - 100
Hlavný autor: Picking, Richard
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: London London :Taylor Graham, 1995 01.01.1994
Predmet:
ISSN:0955-8543, 1361-4568
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Techniques to aid the manipulation of a computer based document were tested by a group of 38 novice users. The subjects were given a period of time to browse the document, and were subsequently given a set of goal related tasks in a question/answer session. The techniques tested were sequential paging, index referral, text find and embedded hypertext links. 3 differing types of link mechanisms were assessed and compared with each other. Sequential paging and index referral were the most commonly used of the techniques. Text find was employed more for goal related tasks than for browsing. The hypertext link technique was generally unpopular, especially for goal related tasks. In order to establish the importance of the text find technique, the effect on reading strategies without this facility was also investigated. For browsing operations, an increase in paging and a decrease in hypertext linking was observed. In the case of goal directed searching, an increase was observed in paging and index referral techniques. The study calls into question the usefulness of hypertext in educational software. Original abstract-amended.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0955-8543
1361-4568
DOI:10.1080/09558543.1994.12031229