Utopia and Ideal Theory Reasons for a Divorce

In political theory, utopia is traditionally understood as representing a beautiful but impossible state of affairs. By contrast, the majority of scholarly works in utopian studies understand utopia not as a blueprint for a perfect society but as an indirect critique of the contemporary status quo....

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Theoria (Pietermaritzburg) Ročník 72; číslo 182; s. 1 - 26
Hlavný autor: Zuolo, Federico
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:Afrikaans
English
Vydavateľské údaje: New York Berghahn Books, Inc 01.03.2025
Predmet:
Political philosophy
Political theory
Theory
Utopias
ISSN:0040-5817, 1558-5816
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:In political theory, utopia is traditionally understood as representing a beautiful but impossible state of affairs. By contrast, the majority of scholarly works in utopian studies understand utopia not as a blueprint for a perfect society but as an indirect critique of the contemporary status quo. The aim of this article is to propose a distinction between utopias and ideal theories. To do so, the article adopts a working definition of utopias that emphasises the formal characters of utopian works (detailed narrative), and compares utopias with ideal theories, which are abstract in kind. After articulating this distinction through some paradigmatic examples (Plato, More, Rawls), the article argues that a better understanding of this difference may help us improve the debate. The article also argues that ideal theories, unlike utopias, are less tainted by the objection that ideals are practically irrelevant.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0040-5817
1558-5816
DOI:10.3167/th.2025.7218201