Assessment of Population Mean MAPs for Activation of Cochlear Implant Sound Processors Compared With Behavioral Programming

Population mean MAPping is a recently developed tool based on normative MAP data from a large cohort of CI recipients. Compared with conventional methods, this novel technique relies less on recipient feedback. There is limited literature about the impact of population mean MAP activation on patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otology & neurotology
Hauptverfasser: Biever, Allison, Bishop, Grayson A, Lupo, J Eric, Kelsall, David C
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 24.10.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1537-4505, 1537-4505
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Population mean MAPping is a recently developed tool based on normative MAP data from a large cohort of CI recipients. Compared with conventional methods, this novel technique relies less on recipient feedback. There is limited literature about the impact of population mean MAP activation on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare audiological outcomes and MAP levels between CI recipients whose devices were programmed at activation using a population mean MAP or the traditional behavioral threshold and loudness scaling method. Retrospective chart review. Single CI center. One hundred seventy-eight adult CI recipients of CI632. Population mean compared with behavioral threshold and loudness scaling MAP activation. Preoperative and postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months; MAP programming characteristics. Postoperative CNC scores improved significantly at all time points from preoperative baseline in both groups who had their MAPs programmed using the population mean or the behavioral programming approach [F (2, 89) = 5.93, P < 0.01]. CNC performance was not affected by the method of activation, or the combined impact of time point and programming method. However, subjects in the population mean group achieved MAP stability more quickly compared with subjects in the behavioral programming group. Recipients activated with population mean demonstrated equivalent CNC scores to those of recipients activated using traditional behavioral workflows. The quicker MAP stabilization in the population mean group can reduce the clinical needs of CI recipients.
AbstractList Population mean MAPping is a recently developed tool based on normative MAP data from a large cohort of CI recipients. Compared with conventional methods, this novel technique relies less on recipient feedback. There is limited literature about the impact of population mean MAP activation on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare audiological outcomes and MAP levels between CI recipients whose devices were programmed at activation using a population mean MAP or the traditional behavioral threshold and loudness scaling method. Retrospective chart review. Single CI center. One hundred seventy-eight adult CI recipients of CI632. Population mean compared with behavioral threshold and loudness scaling MAP activation. Preoperative and postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months; MAP programming characteristics. Postoperative CNC scores improved significantly at all time points from preoperative baseline in both groups who had their MAPs programmed using the population mean or the behavioral programming approach [F (2, 89) = 5.93, P < 0.01]. CNC performance was not affected by the method of activation, or the combined impact of time point and programming method. However, subjects in the population mean group achieved MAP stability more quickly compared with subjects in the behavioral programming group. Recipients activated with population mean demonstrated equivalent CNC scores to those of recipients activated using traditional behavioral workflows. The quicker MAP stabilization in the population mean group can reduce the clinical needs of CI recipients.
Population mean MAPping is a recently developed tool based on normative MAP data from a large cohort of CI recipients. Compared with conventional methods, this novel technique relies less on recipient feedback. There is limited literature about the impact of population mean MAP activation on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare audiological outcomes and MAP levels between CI recipients whose devices were programmed at activation using a population mean MAP or the traditional behavioral threshold and loudness scaling method.OBJECTIVEPopulation mean MAPping is a recently developed tool based on normative MAP data from a large cohort of CI recipients. Compared with conventional methods, this novel technique relies less on recipient feedback. There is limited literature about the impact of population mean MAP activation on patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare audiological outcomes and MAP levels between CI recipients whose devices were programmed at activation using a population mean MAP or the traditional behavioral threshold and loudness scaling method.Retrospective chart review.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective chart review.Single CI center.SETTINGSingle CI center.One hundred seventy-eight adult CI recipients of CI632.PATIENTSOne hundred seventy-eight adult CI recipients of CI632.Population mean compared with behavioral threshold and loudness scaling MAP activation.INTERVENTIONSPopulation mean compared with behavioral threshold and loudness scaling MAP activation.Preoperative and postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months; MAP programming characteristics.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESPreoperative and postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months; MAP programming characteristics.Postoperative CNC scores improved significantly at all time points from preoperative baseline in both groups who had their MAPs programmed using the population mean or the behavioral programming approach [F (2, 89) = 5.93, P < 0.01]. CNC performance was not affected by the method of activation, or the combined impact of time point and programming method. However, subjects in the population mean group achieved MAP stability more quickly compared with subjects in the behavioral programming group.RESULTSPostoperative CNC scores improved significantly at all time points from preoperative baseline in both groups who had their MAPs programmed using the population mean or the behavioral programming approach [F (2, 89) = 5.93, P < 0.01]. CNC performance was not affected by the method of activation, or the combined impact of time point and programming method. However, subjects in the population mean group achieved MAP stability more quickly compared with subjects in the behavioral programming group.Recipients activated with population mean demonstrated equivalent CNC scores to those of recipients activated using traditional behavioral workflows. The quicker MAP stabilization in the population mean group can reduce the clinical needs of CI recipients.CONCLUSIONRecipients activated with population mean demonstrated equivalent CNC scores to those of recipients activated using traditional behavioral workflows. The quicker MAP stabilization in the population mean group can reduce the clinical needs of CI recipients.
Author Bishop, Grayson A
Biever, Allison
Kelsall, David C
Lupo, J Eric
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Allison
  surname: Biever
  fullname: Biever, Allison
  organization: Rocky Mountain Ear Center, Englewood
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Grayson A
  surname: Bishop
  fullname: Bishop, Grayson A
  organization: Cochlear Americas, Lone Tree, Colorado
– sequence: 3
  givenname: J Eric
  surname: Lupo
  fullname: Lupo, J Eric
  organization: Rocky Mountain Ear Center, Englewood
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David C
  surname: Kelsall
  fullname: Kelsall, David C
  organization: Rocky Mountain Ear Center, Englewood
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41131682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkFtLwzAUx4NM3EW_gUgefenMpWm6xzq8DDY2UPFxpOnpVmmamrQD8csbmcIOnAuc3_lz-I_RoLENIHRNyZSSmbxbZespOYk44eQMjajgMooFEYOTeYjG3n8QQiUX8gINY0o5TVI2Qt-Z9-C9gabDtsQb2_a16irb4BWoULKNx6V1ONNddTguAja3el-Dcnhh2lqF0xfbNwXeOKuDmHU-EKZVDgr8XnV7fA97daisU_Uvs3PKmKrZXaLzUtUerv76BL09PrzOn6Pl-mkxz5aRprEkEY0pF7qIaSplLHSaC6pBQMlzBrOkCCnoTMlUyzRnJVAhqdJcl6AkZXnO2ATdHnVbZz978N3WVF5DHT4H2_stZ0mciGCODOjNH9rnBopt6yqj3Nf23zD2AzChcMs
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004630
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1537-4505
ExternalDocumentID 41131682
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.Z2
0R~
123
1J1
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
5VS
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMTA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AAWTL
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACBKD
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACNWC
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADKSD
AE6
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFDTB
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHQNM
AHVBC
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
BQLVK
C45
DIWNM
DU5
E.X
EBS
EEVPB
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
IPNFZ
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
N9A
NPM
O9-
OAG
OAH
OL1
OLV
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OWY
OXXIT
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VVN
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
ZFV
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1470-14135cd4187745c8b51ce5ef3b2e96de96519a78c78b2fe1571ac3cfea712bb22
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISSN 1537-4505
IngestDate Sat Oct 25 08:53:21 EDT 2025
Sat Oct 25 11:10:52 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Behavioral
Threshold Levels
Population Mean
Comfort Levels
Cochlear implant
Electrical Dynamic Range
Activation
Outcomes
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1470-14135cd4187745c8b51ce5ef3b2e96de96519a78c78b2fe1571ac3cfea712bb22
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004630
PMID 41131682
PQID 3264650177
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3264650177
pubmed_primary_41131682
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-Oct-24
20251024
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-10-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-Oct-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Otology & neurotology
PublicationTitleAlternate Otol Neurotol
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0017357
Score 2.4486406
SecondaryResourceType online_first
Snippet Population mean MAPping is a recently developed tool based on normative MAP data from a large cohort of CI recipients. Compared with conventional methods, this...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Title Assessment of Population Mean MAPs for Activation of Cochlear Implant Sound Processors Compared With Behavioral Programming
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41131682
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264650177
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qinjx_VhfRPBabF5Ne5K6uHiwa0HFvS1JmqAHt2pXL_55J9vsehIEC82hpFCSmczXzOT7EDpjMVXaO6CwLIkgHieRApQRaSKdZUJluiVJupGDQTocZmXYcGtCWeVsTZwu1FVt_B75OcAMDmiCSHnx-hZ51SifXQ0SGouowwDK-JIuOfzJIkg2ZfoEp_bc3rGYHZ3L5HmR37bUheHiCYt_B5nTYNNf_-9nbqC1ADNx3trFJlqw4y20UoRE-jb6yueMnLh2uJzLeOHCKmjyssEAZ3FuZvJnvluvNk9eZgJ7TmGYEnznRZlwOGxQvze4F0ra8ePz5AlfzjkAfB9fB_YCkXIHPfSv7nvXUdBhiAzhMo4IBDphKk5SmEVhUi2IscI6pqnNkgpugIFKpkammjpLhCTKMOOskoRqTekuWhrXY7uPsGL-YcVTJzJuuNTww8eUc7FOuKts1UWns2EdgZ375IUa2_qjGf0MbBfttXMzem0JOUacEK-_RQ_-8PYhWqVewhfCD-VHqOPAy-0xWjafk-fm_WRqQNAOyuIbw2XP_Q
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment+of+Population+Mean+MAPs+for+Activation+of+Cochlear+Implant+Sound+Processors+Compared+With+Behavioral+Programming&rft.jtitle=Otology+%26+neurotology&rft.au=Biever%2C+Allison&rft.au=Bishop%2C+Grayson+A&rft.au=Lupo%2C+J+Eric&rft.au=Kelsall%2C+David+C&rft.date=2025-10-24&rft.eissn=1537-4505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMAO.0000000000004630&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F41131682&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F41131682&rft.externalDocID=41131682
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1537-4505&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1537-4505&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1537-4505&client=summon