Constitutional adjudication in Ethiopia: Exploring the experience of the House of Federation (HoF)

Ethiopia has adopted a federal system de facto since 1991, and de jure since 1995 with a view to decentralizing power and resources from the center and to accommodate the diverse ethno-linguistic groups that exist in the country. As constitutionally entrenched division of power between federal and s...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Mizan law review Ročník 1; číslo 1
Hlavný autor: Fiseha, A
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:Amharic
English
Vydavateľské údaje: St. Mary's University, Addis Ababa 14.06.2010
ISSN:1998-9881, 1998-9881, 2309-902X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Ethiopia has adopted a federal system de facto since 1991, and de jure since 1995 with a view to decentralizing power and resources from the center and to accommodate the diverse ethno-linguistic groups that exist in the country. As constitutionally entrenched division of power between federal and state governments is at the bedrock federalism and as the division of powers often is far from clear, it is inherent in any federal system that there must be an organ for the adjudication of constitutional issues and for the settlement of disputes concerning the competence of the two levels of governments. In the 1995 Ethiopian federal constitution, this task is entrusted to the nonlegislative second chamber, otherwise known as the House of Federation (HoF). This article attempts to review the experience of the HoF ever since its establishment by assessing the relevant Ethiopian laws and the decisions of the HoF. With this in view the first sections are devoted, though briefly, to the discussion of the varied practices adopted in some constitutional systems. The remaining sections discuss the underlying reasons for the adoption in the 1995 federal Constitution of Ethiopia, the HoF as a unique institution for the adjudication of disputes and explore its jurisdiction vis-à-vis the judiciary and analyse its achievements and challenges. The general trend observed is that despite institutional and pragmatic challenges, the HoF has over the years evolved as a legitimate body for the settlement of disputes at least as far as issues of high political and constitutional significance are concerned. This article further discusses the extent to which the role of the judiciary has been affected owing to the role of the HoF.
AbstractList Ethiopia has adopted a federal system de facto since 1991, and de jure since 1995 with a view to decentralizing power and resources from the center and to accommodate the diverse ethno-linguistic groups that exist in the country. As constitutionally entrenched division of power between federal and state governments is at the bedrock federalism and as the division of powers often is far from clear, it is inherent in any federal system that there must be an organ for the adjudication of constitutional issues and for the settlement of disputes concerning the competence of the two levels of governments. In the 1995 Ethiopian federal constitution, this task is entrusted to the nonlegislative second chamber, otherwise known as the House of Federation (HoF). This article attempts to review the experience of the HoF ever since its establishment by assessing the relevant Ethiopian laws and the decisions of the HoF. With this in view the first sections are devoted, though briefly, to the discussion of the varied practices adopted in some constitutional systems. The remaining sections discuss the underlying reasons for the adoption in the 1995 federal Constitution of Ethiopia, the HoF as a unique institution for the adjudication of disputes and explore its jurisdiction vis-à-vis the judiciary and analyse its achievements and challenges. The general trend observed is that despite institutional and pragmatic challenges, the HoF has over the years evolved as a legitimate body for the settlement of disputes at least as far as issues of high political and constitutional significance are concerned. This article further discusses the extent to which the role of the judiciary has been affected owing to the role of the HoF.
Author Fiseha, A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A
  surname: Fiseha
  fullname: Fiseha, A
BookMark eNpNkDFPwzAQhS1UJErpyuwRhoQ4cRKbDVUtRarEArN19jmtqzSOnBSVf0-aIsQt794bvuG7JZPGN5aQe5bEPGP86VCH-Is5Fud5wdgVmTIpRSSFYJN__w2Zd90-GS6TqUzFlOiFb7re9cfe-QZqCrg_ojNwrtQ1dNnvnG8dPNPlqa19cM2W9jtL7am1wdnGWOqrcVn7YzeWlUUbLoCHtV893pHrCurOzn9zRj5Xy4_FOtq8v74tXjaRYTxnESZS8rQsGWpTgMTSmEIkWKLUAJoZk5jcWg2lBmZylAVo5FmS81Rw5BXPZuTtwkUPe9UGd4DwrTw4NQ4-bBWE3pnaKoalzrTWIEXBbZ7KwZnmKCqjbZliOrDiC8sE33XBVn88lqizcDUIV2fhahSe_QCLK3fp
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.4314/mlr.v1i1.55611
DatabaseName CrossRef
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
EISSN 1998-9881
2309-902X
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_1d7b3bbba9864e529611b4d8fcbe72d2
10_4314_mlr_v1i1_55611
GroupedDBID -OY
1XV
4JU
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ADBBV
ADUOI
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
C1A
CITATION
GCT
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCSNT
HISYW
HOCAJ
KQ8
KWQ
OK1
RHO
RNS
VGZHO
VWXGM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1451-d09942771dbc6a9d7cc680d7d9baab1cc0c5eeba7ba1c5d96abd43054284d4f43
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1998-9881
IngestDate Mon Dec 01 19:29:50 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:29:48 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language Amharic
English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1451-d09942771dbc6a9d7cc680d7d9baab1cc0c5eeba7ba1c5d96abd43054284d4f43
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/1d7b3bbba9864e529611b4d8fcbe72d2
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1d7b3bbba9864e529611b4d8fcbe72d2
crossref_primary_10_4314_mlr_v1i1_55611
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-06-14
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-06-14
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-06-14
  day: 14
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Mizan law review
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher St. Mary's University, Addis Ababa
Publisher_xml – name: St. Mary's University, Addis Ababa
SSID ssj0000392928
ssib026971388
Score 1.7294204
Snippet Ethiopia has adopted a federal system de facto since 1991, and de jure since 1995 with a view to decentralizing power and resources from the center and to...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
Title Constitutional adjudication in Ethiopia: Exploring the experience of the House of Federation (HoF)
URI https://doaj.org/article/1d7b3bbba9864e529611b4d8fcbe72d2
Volume 1
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1998-9881
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000392928
  issn: 1998-9881
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20070101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELWgYmBBfIryJQ9IwOC2jt04ZgNE1AFVDCB1i3w-RwqCtipt-fvYTqjKxMIYK7Kid47vznd-j5BLsN6qwgKz3r8zKSWyLC0Tpq3VJlVGCoVRbEINh9lopJ_XpL5CT1hND1wD1-WoQACACTziLlQJOQeJWWnBqQTj7uujnrVkyq-kJNU--WqIuOKeHMKAKLQa75TpLOM1g6P3n7L78T7rLHnFO0Erkv_yUGtE_tHj5LtkpwkV6V39iXtkw3zsk80n83VAIOhsxiJ_PMmjBt8W2Jy-0WpMQxf7ZFqZW7rqsaM-0qNuRWxMJ2UcGfjMPz7kgVWinuB6MMlvDslr_vjyMGCNWgKzQW2XoY_1ZKIUR7Cp0aisTbMeKtRgDHBre7bvHBgFhts-6tQABr4vn39IlKUUR6Q1nozdMaECHYDNlBB9IV2ZgQ4_tkFu0iRB4G1y9YNQMa1JMQqfTAQsC49lEbAsIpZtch8AXL0VyKzjgDdx0Zi4-MvEJ_8xySnZrgv_KePyjLTms4U7J1t2Oa8-Zxdx9XwDWsTI2w
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constitutional+adjudication+in+Ethiopia%3A+Exploring+the+experience+of+the+House+of+Federation+%28HoF%29&rft.jtitle=Mizan+law+review&rft.au=A+Fiseha&rft.date=2010-06-14&rft.pub=St.+Mary%27s+University%2C+Addis+Ababa&rft.issn=1998-9881&rft.eissn=2309-902X&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314%2Fmlr.v1i1.55611&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_1d7b3bbba9864e529611b4d8fcbe72d2
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1998-9881&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1998-9881&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1998-9881&client=summon