Image-Making After Photoshop Architecture, Public Space and their Visual Discontents[1]

Nowadays, I like to refer to “photography of architecture” rather than to “architectural photography”. This is intentional. Within the notion of architectural photography is the sense of a practice of image-making that gravitates exclusively around the field of architecture—thus relating to the stri...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Sophia (Porto. Em linha) Ročník 4; číslo 1; s. 100 - 109
Hlavný autor: Pedro Gadanho
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: 01.12.2019
ISSN:2183-8976, 2183-9468
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Nowadays, I like to refer to “photography of architecture” rather than to “architectural photography”. This is intentional. Within the notion of architectural photography is the sense of a practice of image-making that gravitates exclusively around the field of architecture—thus relating to the stricter aims and legitimation criteria of that discipline and its professional domain. With the broader scope of a “photography of architecture” we may hint at a practice that, while still permeated by architecture-related subject matters, is not dependent on architecture’s specific discourses. Curiously, this approach may have deeper, if less obvious, implications for the culture of architecture and the depiction of public spaces as we have known them until today. From the untold history of architectural photography a profound contradiction emerges: Underlining architecture and urban landscapes as specific topics opposes photography’s progressive flight from a primary emphasis on its topics or themes towards an understanding of it as a self-governing form of art. As I have put it elsewhere, “it goes against the grain of photography’s autonomy to acknowledge that there is a particular practice of photography that is conditioned, or somehow individuated by its focusing on a given subject matter”[2]. If we want to enjoy the critical insights that this foreign discourse can have on architecture, we should overcome this contradiction. Indeed, in addressing how architecture and the representation of public space are impacted by current image-making, we may need to do more than just confront it with the “faithful” mirror of architectural photography. It is true that beyond the possible relevance of this subfield to the wider history of photography, architecture’s century-long romance with architectural photography has had many concrete outcomes. From Erich Mendelsohn, Le Corbusier, and Mies van der Rohe’s early uses of documentary photography and photographic collages, to the delayed recognition of photographers who mostly portrayed buildings as a service to the architectural industry, such as Ezra Stoller and Julius Schulman, architectural photography has a specific yet overreaching history. With growing architectural diffusion through various media, including the internet, the practice has also had the opportunity to amplify its field, find its new heroes, and open up to innumerous practitioners. Through the early adoption of visualization techniques such as photomontage to the proliferating commercial uses of retouched images of just-finished buildings, architectural photography has established its own degrees of autonomy. [...]    
AbstractList Nowadays, I like to refer to “photography of architecture” rather than to “architectural photography”. This is intentional. Within the notion of architectural photography is the sense of a practice of image-making that gravitates exclusively around the field of architecture—thus relating to the stricter aims and legitimation criteria of that discipline and its professional domain. With the broader scope of a “photography of architecture” we may hint at a practice that, while still permeated by architecture-related subject matters, is not dependent on architecture’s specific discourses. Curiously, this approach may have deeper, if less obvious, implications for the culture of architecture and the depiction of public spaces as we have known them until today. From the untold history of architectural photography a profound contradiction emerges: Underlining architecture and urban landscapes as specific topics opposes photography’s progressive flight from a primary emphasis on its topics or themes towards an understanding of it as a self-governing form of art. As I have put it elsewhere, “it goes against the grain of photography’s autonomy to acknowledge that there is a particular practice of photography that is conditioned, or somehow individuated by its focusing on a given subject matter”[2]. If we want to enjoy the critical insights that this foreign discourse can have on architecture, we should overcome this contradiction. Indeed, in addressing how architecture and the representation of public space are impacted by current image-making, we may need to do more than just confront it with the “faithful” mirror of architectural photography. It is true that beyond the possible relevance of this subfield to the wider history of photography, architecture’s century-long romance with architectural photography has had many concrete outcomes. From Erich Mendelsohn, Le Corbusier, and Mies van der Rohe’s early uses of documentary photography and photographic collages, to the delayed recognition of photographers who mostly portrayed buildings as a service to the architectural industry, such as Ezra Stoller and Julius Schulman, architectural photography has a specific yet overreaching history. With growing architectural diffusion through various media, including the internet, the practice has also had the opportunity to amplify its field, find its new heroes, and open up to innumerous practitioners. Through the early adoption of visualization techniques such as photomontage to the proliferating commercial uses of retouched images of just-finished buildings, architectural photography has established its own degrees of autonomy. [...]    
Author Pedro Gadanho
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  surname: Pedro Gadanho
  fullname: Pedro Gadanho
BookMark eNpNj0tLAzEUhYNUsNb-AxdduI3em9wkM-CmFB-Fil3Udcjk0Q7aSZl047-3rUXcnHPgHC73u2aDLneRsTuEe0EVwYPASvKqNtoKwJoDANmDoEV5wYantiZdDc75uLxi41LaBhRqQmXMkN3Ot24d-Zv7bLv1ZJr2sZ8sN3mfyybvbthlcl8ljs8-Yh_PT6vZK1-8v8xn0wX3CEbyhEYnLUIyjpyR0nuULgXtMEkXVUgCyAeBBHUg73VDRpE0Hg7vqdQEOWKPv3d9n0vpY7K7vt26_tsi2BOsPSLYP1j7H1b-ACZuSOQ
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.24840/2183-8976_2019-0004_0001_13
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2183-9468
EndPage 109
ExternalDocumentID 10_24840_2183_8976_2019_0004_0001_13
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ABUWG
AFFHD
AFKRA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AVQMV
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
DWQXO
GROUPED_DOAJ
K50
M1D
PEJEM
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PMKZF
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1073-f176f62df7a4a733cc13afd6a1f3ae5df204cd21409d4cc6b475437c09465fbd3
ISSN 2183-8976
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 02:54:45 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 1
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1073-f176f62df7a4a733cc13afd6a1f3ae5df204cd21409d4cc6b475437c09465fbd3
OpenAccessLink https://www.up.pt/revistas/index.php/sophia/article/download/229/213
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_24840_2183_8976_2019_0004_0001_13
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Sophia (Porto. Em linha)
PublicationYear 2019
SSID ssib051641577
ssj0002910642
Score 1.7071314
Snippet Nowadays, I like to refer to “photography of architecture” rather than to “architectural photography”. This is intentional. Within the notion of architectural...
SourceID crossref
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 100
Subtitle Architecture, Public Space and their Visual Discontents[1]
Title Image-Making After Photoshop
Volume 4
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2183-9468
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002910642
  issn: 2183-8976
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ISSN International Center)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2183-9468
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssib051641577
  issn: 2183-8976
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Arts & Humanities Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2183-9468
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002910642
  issn: 2183-8976
  databaseCode: M1D
  dateStart: 20160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/artshumanities
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2183-9468
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002910642
  issn: 2183-8976
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2183-9468
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002910642
  issn: 2183-8976
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LS8QwEA6-EC-iqPhmD96WaPNo0xxF1ge4i6CCt5ImDevBdtldxZO_3Un62KogKngpJdBp2q_98k2SmUHoSFFqTZQSHJk4wJymKU5jwnAUa22JlDbQHulrMRjEDw_ypir8N_HlBESex6-vcvSvUEMbgO1CZ38Bd2MUGuAcQIcjwA7HHwF_9QQUgfu-ylT31JcAvxkW02IyLEZtKXpbjIaPyilMt5u0OO72nrqgOd0CkJwRphkX3QtlVD4s2hMERLY2W3gecSIIx1JUGadnbZKXFW1qIuRf8C5JjQRBa3wkPp3BF-qlHFxFF15S3y3xfXGa0S9wJ2XI6ceM159GomZ_IHgm3l7irCWNtaRtbR4tUhFKx2T9t17NISG4fySsYmvdaExBD0W-hlLTs2V0VHf45JvutpRKS3LcraHVylfonJYYr6O5LN9A-218Ox7fToPvJro_792dXeKqxAXW4HczbImIbESNFYorwZjWhCn4eRSxTGWhsTTg2lCXlcxwraOUi5AzocEpj0KbGraFFvIiz7ZRJwuFFjFjWWAsDzIhtRUgNVLlU_ozs4PC-nGSUZnJJPnJe97943V7aGX2Ne6jhen4OTtAS_pl-jgZH_q5j0MP3TvzFTiO
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image-Making+After+Photoshop&rft.jtitle=Sophia+%28Porto.+Em+linha%29&rft.au=Pedro+Gadanho&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.issn=2183-8976&rft.eissn=2183-9468&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=109&rft_id=info:doi/10.24840%2F2183-8976_2019-0004_0001_13&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_24840_2183_8976_2019_0004_0001_13
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2183-8976&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2183-8976&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2183-8976&client=summon