Decreased retinal sensitivity after internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole surgery

Aims To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peelin...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:British journal of ophthalmology Ročník 96; číslo 12; s. 1513 - 1516
Hlavní autoři: Tadayoni, Ramin, Svorenova, Ivana, Erginay, Ali, Gaudric, Alain, Massin, Pascale
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.12.2012
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Témata:
ISSN:0007-1161, 1468-2079, 1468-2079
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Aims To compare the retinal sensitivity and frequency of microscotomas found by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) combined with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry after idiopathic macular hole closure, in eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and eyes that did not. Methods This was a retrospective, non-randomised, comparative study. Combined SD-OCT and SLO microperimetry was performed in 16 consecutive eyes after closure of an idiopathic macular hole. A customised microperimetry pattern with 29 measurement points was used. The ILM was peeled in 8/16 eyes. The main outcome measure was mean retinal sensitivity. Results Mean retinal sensitivity (in dB) was lower after peeling: 9.80±2.35 dB with peeling versus 13.19±2.92 without (p=0.0209). Postoperative microscotomas were significantly more frequent after ILM peeling: 11.3±6.6 points with retinal sensitivity below 10 dB in eyes that underwent peeling versus 2.9±4.6 in those that did not (p=0.0093). Conclusions These results suggest that ILM peeling may reduce retinal sensitivity, and significantly increase the incidence of microscotomas. Until a prospective trial confirming or not these results, it seems justified to avoid peeling the ILM when its potential benefit seems minor or unproved, and when peeling is carried out, to limit the surface peeled to the bare minimum.
Bibliografie:local:bjophthalmol;96/12/1513
PMID:23077227
ArticleID:bjophthalmol-2012-302035
istex:EE17252139345D050F7463B50427FFF561B0BECB
ark:/67375/NVC-CP06X8GB-M
href:bjophthalmol-96-1513.pdf
RT and IS contributed equally.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
This paper was presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting in May, 2011.
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302035