Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy within a national diabetic retinopathy screening service

Aims Determine the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and risk factors in a large community based screening programme, in order to accurately estimate the future burden of this specific and debilitating complication of diabetes. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of 91 393 persons...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:British journal of ophthalmology Ročník 99; číslo 1; s. 64 - 68
Hlavní autoři: Thomas, Rebecca L, Dunstan, Frank D, Luzio, Stephen D, Chowdhury, Sharmistha Roy, North, Rachel V, Hale, Sarah L, Gibbins, Robert L, Owens, David R
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.01.2015
Témata:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Blood pressure
Child
Consent
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications
Diabetic retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy - classification
Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis
Diabetic Retinopathy - epidemiology
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
National Health Programs - statistics & numerical data
Odds Ratio
Photography
Prevalence
Quality
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Wales - epidemiology
Young Adult
Wales
United Kingdom > UK
Retina
Epidemiology
Public health
ISSN:0007-1161, 1468-2079, 1468-2079
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Aims Determine the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and risk factors in a large community based screening programme, in order to accurately estimate the future burden of this specific and debilitating complication of diabetes. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of 91 393 persons with diabetes, 5003 type 1 diabetes and 86 390 type 2 diabetes, at their first screening by the community based National Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Service for Wales from 2005 to 2009. Image capture used 2×45° digital images per eye following mydriasis, classified by qualified retinal graders with final grading based on the worst eye. Results The prevalence of any DR and sight-threatening DR in those with type 1 diabetes was 56.0% and 11.2%, respectively, and in type 2 diabetes was 30.3% and 2.9%, respectively. The presence of DR, non-sight-threatening and sight-threatening, was strongly associated with increasing duration of diabetes for either type 1 or type 2 diabetes and also associated with insulin therapy in those with type 2 diabetes. Conclusions Prevalence of DR within the largest reported community-based, quality assured, DR screening programme, was higher in persons with type 1 diabetes; however, the major burden is represented by type 2 diabetes which is 94% of the screened population.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304017