Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:BMJ (Online) Ročník 368; s. l6890
Hlavní autoři: Campbell, Mhairi, McKenzie, Joanne E, Sowden, Amanda, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Brennan, Sue E, Ellis, Simon, Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie, Ryan, Rebecca, Shepperd, Sasha, Thomas, James, Welch, Vivian, Thomson, Hilary
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 16.01.2020
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Témata:
ISSN:1756-1833, 0959-8138, 1756-1833
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1756-1833
0959-8138
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.l6890