Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | BMJ (Online) Ročník 368; s. l6890 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
England
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
16.01.2020
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1756-1833, 0959-8138, 1756-1833 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1756-1833 0959-8138 1756-1833 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.l6890 |