Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry

Background: Matrix perimetry is a new iteration of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) which uses a smaller target size in the standard achromatic perimetry presentation pattern. Aim: To compare the performance of matrix and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) perimetry in detecting gl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of ophthalmology Vol. 91; no. 7; pp. 933 - 938
Main Authors: Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia, Wollstein, Gadi, Patel, Avni, Bilonick, Richard A, Ishikawa, Hiroshi, Kagemann, Larry, Dilworth, William D, Schuman, Joel S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.07.2007
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects:
ISSN:0007-1161, 1468-2079
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Matrix perimetry is a new iteration of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) which uses a smaller target size in the standard achromatic perimetry presentation pattern. Aim: To compare the performance of matrix and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) perimetry in detecting glaucoma diagnosed by structural assessment. Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods: 76 eyes from 15 healthy subjects and 61 consecutive glaucoma suspects and patients with glaucoma were included. All patients underwent optic nerve head (ONH) photography, SITA and matrix perimetries, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) within a 6-month period. Glaucoma diagnosis was established by either glaucomatous optic neuropathy or OCT by assessing retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness. Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), glaucoma hemifield test and cluster of abnormal testing locations were recorded from matrix and SITA perimetries. Results: Similar correlations were observed with matrix and SITA perimetry MD and PSD with either cup-to-disc ratio or OCT mean RNFL. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves of MD and PSD for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes ranged from 0.69 to 0.81 for matrix perimetry and from 0.75 to 0.77 for SITA perimetry. There were no significant differences among any corresponding matrix and SITA perimetry AROCs. Conclusions: Matrix and SITA perimetries had similar capabilities for distinguishing between healthy and glaucomatous eyes regardless of whether the diagnosis was established by ONH or OCT–RNFL assessment.
Bibliography:Correspondence to: Dr J S Schuman Department of Ophthalmology, UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Suite 816, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; schumanjs@upmc.edu
istex:B2EC63280243434578BC0E052584A8896D53F16D
PMID:17215267
ark:/67375/NVC-N73276KF-7
href:bjophthalmol-91-933.pdf
local:0910933
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ZB‐E and GW had equal roles in preparation of the manuscript.
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2006.110437