Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback

Audit and feedback (A&F) is a commonly used quality improvement (QI) approach. A Cochrane review indicates that A&F is generally effective and leads to modest improvements in professional practice but with considerable variation in the observed effects. While we have some understanding of fa...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:BMJ quality & safety Ročník 28; číslo 5; s. 416 - 423
Hlavní autori: Grimshaw, JM, Ivers, Noah, Linklater, Stefanie, Foy, Robbie, Francis, Jill J, Gude, Wouter T, Hysong, Sylvia J, Alderson, Sarah, Boet, Sylvain, Brehaut, Jamie, Brown, Benjamin, Clarkson, Jan, Colquhoun, Heather, Keizer, Nicolette de, Desveaux, Laura, Dobell, Gail, Dunn, Sandra, Farrin, Amanda, Foy, Robbie C, Greenberg, Anna, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Hartley, Suzanne, Horsley, Tanya, Ivers, Noah M, Landis-Lewis, Zach, London, Jane, Lorencatto, Fabiana, Michie, Susan, O’Connor, Denise, Peek, Niels, Presseau, Justin, Ramsay, Craig, Sales, Anne E, Sprague, Ann, Stanworth, Simon, Sykes, Michael, Taljaard, Monica, Thavorn, Kednapa, Walker, Mark, Walwyn, Rebecaa, Weiss, Debra, Willis, Thomas A, Witteman, Holly
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.05.2019
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Predmet:
ISSN:2044-5415, 2044-5423, 2044-5423
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Audit and feedback (A&F) is a commonly used quality improvement (QI) approach. A Cochrane review indicates that A&F is generally effective and leads to modest improvements in professional practice but with considerable variation in the observed effects. While we have some understanding of factors that enhance the effects of A&F, further research needs to explore when A&F is most likely to be effective and how to optimise it. To do this, we need to move away from two-arm trials of A&F compared with control in favour of head-to-head trials of different ways of providing A&F. This paper describes implementation laboratories involving collaborations between healthcare organisations providing A&F at scale, and researchers, to embed head-to-head trials into routine QI programmes. This can improve effectiveness while producing generalisable knowledge about how to optimise A&F. We also describe an international meta-laboratory that aims to maximise cross-laboratory learning and facilitate coordination of A&F research.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2044-5415
2044-5423
2044-5423
DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008355