Treatment of recurrent serous borderline tumors with noninvasive peritoneal implants
Final pathology showed a serous borderline ovarian tumor (Figure 1A) with foci of microinvasion and one non-invasive implant (Figure 1B) in the omentun measuring 5 mm (2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage: IIIB). The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESG...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecological cancer Jg. 34; H. 9; S. 1466 - 1469 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01.09.2024
Elsevier Inc Elsevier Limited |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1048-891X, 1525-1438, 1525-1438 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Final pathology showed a serous borderline ovarian tumor (Figure 1A) with foci of microinvasion and one non-invasive implant (Figure 1B) in the omentun measuring 5 mm (2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage: IIIB). The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Guidelines 3 do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for primary treatment of serous borderline tumors with extraovarian invasive and non-invasive implants. The authors did not find differences in progression- free survival between patients who received chemotherapy and those who did not. 6 Dr. Martin: What is the role of hormonal therapy in patients with serous borderline tumors? NCCN guidelines 4 recommend surgery for patients with recurrent serous borderline tumors. Residual disease after cytoreductive surgery and the type of peritoneal implants are important factors for prognosis in the advanced stages. 8 Survival is worse in patients with invasive implants compared with non-invasive. 8 A meta-analysis of 97 studies including 4129 women showed that survival of non-invasive implants was 95.3% while it was 66% for those with invasive implants (p<0.0001). |
|---|---|
| Bibliographie: | ObjectType-Case Study-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-4 ObjectType-Report-1 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Report-3 ObjectType-Case Study-4 |
| ISSN: | 1048-891X 1525-1438 1525-1438 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005811 |