APA (7th ed.) Citation

Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Klick, J., Mellers, B., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2009). Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. Journal of applied psychology, 94(3), 567. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Blanton, Hart, James Jaccard, Jonathan Klick, Barbara Mellers, Gregory Mitchell, and Philip E. Tetlock. "Strong Claims and Weak Evidence: Reassessing the Predictive Validity of the IAT." Journal of Applied Psychology 94, no. 3 (2009): 567. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Blanton, Hart, et al. "Strong Claims and Weak Evidence: Reassessing the Predictive Validity of the IAT." Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, no. 3, 2009, p. 567, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665.