Do the Right Thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality

Decades of experimental research show that some people forgo personal gains to benefit others in unilateral anonymous interactions. To explain these results, behavioral economists typically assume that people have social preferences for minimizing inequality and/or maximizing efficiency (social welf...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Judgment and Decision Making Ročník 13; číslo 1; s. 99 - 111
Hlavní autori: Capraro, Valerio, Rand, David G.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Tallahassee Society for Judgment and Decision Making 01.01.2018
Cambridge University Press
Predmet:
Behavior
Decision making
Economic theory
Efficiency
efficiencyNAKeywords
equity
Ethical aspects
Game theory
Helping behavior
Morality
Personal preferences (Social sciences)
Preferences
prosociality
Psychological aspects
Psychological research
efficiency
prosociality
equity
morality
ISSN:1930-2975, 1930-2975
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Decades of experimental research show that some people forgo personal gains to benefit others in unilateral anonymous interactions. To explain these results, behavioral economists typically assume that people have social preferences for minimizing inequality and/or maximizing efficiency (social welfare). Here we present data that cannot be explained by these standard social preference models. We use a ＂Trade-Off Game＂ (TOG), where players unilaterally choose between an equitable option and an efficient option. We show that simply changing the labelling of the options to describe the equitable versus efficient option as morally right completely reverses the correlation between behavior in the TOG and play in a separate Dictator Game (DG) or Prisoner's Dilemma (PD): people who take the action framed as moral in the TOG, be it equitable or efficient, are much more prosocial in the DG and PD. Rather than preferences for equity and/or efficiency per se, our results suggest that prosociality in games such as the DG and PD are driven by a generalized morality preference that motivates people to do what they think is morally right.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1930-2975
1930-2975
DOI:10.1017/s1930297500008858