Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing

It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex compensatory ones. The authors argue that these findings might be due not to limitations of cognitive capacity but instead to limitations of information...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition Ročník 34; číslo 5; s. 1055
Hlavní autoři: Glöckner, Andreas, Betsch, Tilmann
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.09.2008
Témata:
ISSN:0278-7393
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex compensatory ones. The authors argue that these findings might be due not to limitations of cognitive capacity but instead to limitations of information search imposed by the commonly used experimental tool Mouselab (J. W. Payne, J. R. Bettman, & E. J. Johnson, 1988). The authors tested this assumption in 3 experiments. In the 1st experiment, information was openly presented, whereas in the 2nd experiment, the standard Mouselab program was used under different time limits. The results indicate that individuals are able to compute weighted additive decision strategies extremely quickly if information search is not restricted by the experimental procedure. In a 3rd experiment, these results were replicated using more complex decision tasks, and the major alternative explanations that individuals use more complex heuristics or that they merely encode the constellation of cues were ruled out. In sum, the findings challenge the fundaments of bounded rationality and highlight the importance of automatic processes in decision making.
AbstractList It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex compensatory ones. The authors argue that these findings might be due not to limitations of cognitive capacity but instead to limitations of information search imposed by the commonly used experimental tool Mouselab (J. W. Payne, J. R. Bettman, & E. J. Johnson, 1988). The authors tested this assumption in 3 experiments. In the 1st experiment, information was openly presented, whereas in the 2nd experiment, the standard Mouselab program was used under different time limits. The results indicate that individuals are able to compute weighted additive decision strategies extremely quickly if information search is not restricted by the experimental procedure. In a 3rd experiment, these results were replicated using more complex decision tasks, and the major alternative explanations that individuals use more complex heuristics or that they merely encode the constellation of cues were ruled out. In sum, the findings challenge the fundaments of bounded rationality and highlight the importance of automatic processes in decision making.
It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex compensatory ones. The authors argue that these findings might be due not to limitations of cognitive capacity but instead to limitations of information search imposed by the commonly used experimental tool Mouselab (J. W. Payne, J. R. Bettman, & E. J. Johnson, 1988). The authors tested this assumption in 3 experiments. In the 1st experiment, information was openly presented, whereas in the 2nd experiment, the standard Mouselab program was used under different time limits. The results indicate that individuals are able to compute weighted additive decision strategies extremely quickly if information search is not restricted by the experimental procedure. In a 3rd experiment, these results were replicated using more complex decision tasks, and the major alternative explanations that individuals use more complex heuristics or that they merely encode the constellation of cues were ruled out. In sum, the findings challenge the fundaments of bounded rationality and highlight the importance of automatic processes in decision making.It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex compensatory ones. The authors argue that these findings might be due not to limitations of cognitive capacity but instead to limitations of information search imposed by the commonly used experimental tool Mouselab (J. W. Payne, J. R. Bettman, & E. J. Johnson, 1988). The authors tested this assumption in 3 experiments. In the 1st experiment, information was openly presented, whereas in the 2nd experiment, the standard Mouselab program was used under different time limits. The results indicate that individuals are able to compute weighted additive decision strategies extremely quickly if information search is not restricted by the experimental procedure. In a 3rd experiment, these results were replicated using more complex decision tasks, and the major alternative explanations that individuals use more complex heuristics or that they merely encode the constellation of cues were ruled out. In sum, the findings challenge the fundaments of bounded rationality and highlight the importance of automatic processes in decision making.
Author Glöckner, Andreas
Betsch, Tilmann
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Andreas
  surname: Glöckner
  fullname: Glöckner, Andreas
  email: gloeckner@coll.mpg.de
  organization: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany. gloeckner@coll.mpg.de
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tilmann
  surname: Betsch
  fullname: Betsch, Tilmann
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18763891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9T7tOxDAQdHGIe8AXIKFUdMn5Ecd2QYFOHCDdiQbqaO1skCEv4qTg7zHiYJvZnZ2Z1a7Jous7JOSK0YxRobaUK50qYUQm8kxGTsoFWf2zS7IO4Z3-lNDnZMm0KoQ2bEVuj3Mz-aHBdEQIfZdU6HzwsWnhw3dviYWAVRJnmKe-hcm7ZBh7hyHE7QU5q6EJeHnCDXnd37_sHtPD88PT7u6QguR0SjW4SjluLUWtLaMIiiJTEoXmgpk61wYUA0etLkAW0YMOUUpj60oDo3xDbn5z4-nPGcNUtj44bBrosJ9DWZjc5DlTUXh9Es62xaocRt_C-FX-Pcy_AUF2WGI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1878
crossref_primary_10_1027_2151_2604_a000605
crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2012_758101
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_012_0289_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2021_117979
crossref_primary_10_1080_15248372_2023_2248257
crossref_primary_10_3390_bs14030191
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12111464
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2015_08_008
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_650206
crossref_primary_10_53487_atasobed_1613388
crossref_primary_10_1287_orsc_2015_0987
crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_12119
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_019_02118_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_693575
crossref_primary_10_1080_09602011_2022_2025861
crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2022_2055560
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10339_009_0337_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_obhdp_2012_02_002
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1393729
crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2020_1869752
crossref_primary_10_1080_1047840X_2018_1480683
crossref_primary_10_1080_0267257X_2013_774290
crossref_primary_10_1177_17456916231204579
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1899
crossref_primary_10_1080_02699931_2021_1884533
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_011_0083_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_017_0938_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_642
crossref_primary_10_3758_PBR_17_6_923
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_2075
crossref_primary_10_1515_rle_2024_0109
crossref_primary_10_1080_1047840X_2024_2366793
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1780
crossref_primary_10_1080_10413200_2011_555346
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_1813
crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2015_1135929
crossref_primary_10_1111_sjop_12418
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1740_1461_2011_01238_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2023_104614
crossref_primary_10_2501_S147078531020151X
crossref_primary_10_1111_jels_12009
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_021_01188_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_2063
crossref_primary_10_1177_1091142110381642
crossref_primary_10_1027_1864_9335_a000214
crossref_primary_10_1177_1747021820903439
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11299_020_00223_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1895
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2011_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1956
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_668
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geb_2015_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1038_nn_3836
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aei_2019_100927
crossref_primary_10_1002_wcs_1559
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_obhdp_2012_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogpsych_2012_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_1047840X_2010_520260
crossref_primary_10_1177_0146167210378513
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1943
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1820
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_021_01224_8
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2417456122
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540962_2015_1007707
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546780903395748
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2017_00013
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1007201
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_012_0126_7
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_020_01127_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2013_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_2002
crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_13143
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13102_024_01046_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_684
crossref_primary_10_1027_1618_3169_a000078
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2010_11_002
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_867874
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_2029
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_688
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jchemed_0c00248
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500001595
crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X12464432
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1983
crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2023_2166204
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_00191
crossref_primary_10_1080_1047840X_2010_517737
crossref_primary_10_1002_bdm_1847
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_021_02553_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1756_8765_2010_01123_x
crossref_primary_10_1177_00332941221137255
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1423728
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogdev_2019_100846
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2020_1720813
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_024_07075_1
crossref_primary_10_1027_1618_3169_56_5_344
crossref_primary_10_1109_THMS_2021_3121666
crossref_primary_10_3390_fi13060156
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2012_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_022_03779_4
crossref_primary_10_2165_11537870_000000000_00000
crossref_primary_10_1027_1618_3169_a000084
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
Psychology
ExternalDocumentID 18763891
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-ET
-~X
.GJ
0R~
186
29K
354
41~
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6TJ
6TS
7RZ
85S
8VB
9M8
AAAHA
AAYJJ
AAYOK
ABCQX
ABDPE
ABIVO
ABNCP
ABPPZ
ABVOZ
ACGFO
ACNCT
ACPQG
ADMHG
AEHFB
AEMOZ
AETEA
AFFNX
AHQJS
AI.
AKVCP
ALEEW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BKOMP
CGNQK
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
D-I
EBR
EBU
ECM
EIF
EMK
EPA
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
ISO
K1G
L7B
LPU
LW5
MVM
NHB
NPM
O9-
OHT
OPA
OVD
P-O
P2P
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PZZ
QWB
ROL
RXW
SES
SPA
TAE
TEORI
TH9
TN5
UHB
UHS
UPT
VH1
WH7
XJT
XOL
XZL
YCJ
YQT
YR5
YYQ
YZZ
ZCA
ZCG
ZHY
ZL0
ZPI
ZXP
3KI
7X8
ABUFD
ADXHL
AFFHD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a520t-8acd7c2bb0e88b10ea70e175e382319f489a71ac0b86a56520ecee559bfd8a102
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 219
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000258907400004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0278-7393
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 14:44:55 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:02:04 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a520t-8acd7c2bb0e88b10ea70e175e382319f489a71ac0b86a56520ecee559bfd8a102
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2008_12online.pdf
PMID 18763891
PQID 69494417
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_69494417
pubmed_primary_18763891
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2008-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2008-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2008
  text: 2008-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
PublicationTitleAlternate J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
PublicationYear 2008
SSID ssj0000038
Score 2.3906946
Snippet It has been repeatedly shown that in decisions under time constraints, individuals predominantly use noncompensatory strategies rather than complex...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1055
SubjectTerms Attention
Automatism - psychology
Choice Behavior
Cues
Culture
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Intuition
Judgment
Male
Probability Learning
Problem Solving
Reaction Time
Title Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18763891
https://www.proquest.com/docview/69494417
Volume 34
WOSCitedRecordID wos000258907400004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEB6q9dCLj_qqzxy8bt28uhtQRMTiwZYeVHoLm90NeGhSbSv4753ZJOJFPHgJJCEQZicz32Rmvw_gwkbC5EL4TBktWGSkZhm3koUGV0RliHDdyP_LoxiP5XSaTFpw1eyFobHKJia6QG1KTf_ILwdJlJBc1s38jZFmFPVWawGNNWiHCGTIp8VU_gC_TseaWmuMeN8aziFi9Gmu9cOoH5PWbfw7wnSZZrj1v3fchs0aYXq3lUvsQMsWXRJnrgc5utD5Dnqfu3A9qicKGU2nl4VnatEdb-Z0qjxKc8bDc7Valo7f1ZtXmwvw7h48D--f7h5YLanAVBzwJZNKG6GDjNZDZj63SnCLCMK6dmCSRzJRwleaZ3KgEOsF3GIWxaojy41UCEb2Yb0oC3sIXqC5VjYzscHC1uZY94VShSaURhPFvuzBeWOkFF2W-hCqsOVqkTZm6sFBZed0XjFrpD7x48nEP_rz2WPoNJMb3D-Bdo4fqz2FDf2xfF28nzlPwON4MvoCZFO9Yg
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple-reason+decision+making+based+on+automatic+processing&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+experimental+psychology.+Learning%2C+memory%2C+and+cognition&rft.au=Gl%C3%B6ckner%2C+Andreas&rft.au=Betsch%2C+Tilmann&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2F0278-7393.34.5.1055&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F18763891&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F18763891&rft.externalDocID=18763891
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0278-7393&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0278-7393&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0278-7393&client=summon