On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience

A fundamental claim associated with parallel distributed processing (PDP) theories of cognition is that knowledge is coded in a distributed manner in mind and brain. This approach rejects the claim that knowledge is coded in a localist fashion, with words, objects, and simple concepts (e.g. "do...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Psychological review Ročník 116; číslo 1; s. 220
Hlavný autor: Bowers, Jeffrey S
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.01.2009
Predmet:
ISSN:0033-295X
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract A fundamental claim associated with parallel distributed processing (PDP) theories of cognition is that knowledge is coded in a distributed manner in mind and brain. This approach rejects the claim that knowledge is coded in a localist fashion, with words, objects, and simple concepts (e.g. "dog"), that is, coded with their own dedicated representations. One of the putative advantages of this approach is that the theories are biologically plausible. Indeed, advocates of the PDP approach often highlight the close parallels between distributed representations learned in connectionist models and neural coding in brain and often dismiss localist (grandmother cell) theories as biologically implausible. The author reviews a range a data that strongly challenge this claim and shows that localist models provide a better account of single-cell recording studies. The author also contrast local and alternative distributed coding schemes (sparse and coarse coding) and argues that common rejection of grandmother cell theories in neuroscience is due to a misunderstanding about how localist models behave. The author concludes that the localist representations embedded in theories of perception and cognition are consistent with neuroscience; biology only calls into question the distributed representations often learned in PDP models.
AbstractList A fundamental claim associated with parallel distributed processing (PDP) theories of cognition is that knowledge is coded in a distributed manner in mind and brain. This approach rejects the claim that knowledge is coded in a localist fashion, with words, objects, and simple concepts (e.g. "dog"), that is, coded with their own dedicated representations. One of the putative advantages of this approach is that the theories are biologically plausible. Indeed, advocates of the PDP approach often highlight the close parallels between distributed representations learned in connectionist models and neural coding in brain and often dismiss localist (grandmother cell) theories as biologically implausible. The author reviews a range a data that strongly challenge this claim and shows that localist models provide a better account of single-cell recording studies. The author also contrast local and alternative distributed coding schemes (sparse and coarse coding) and argues that common rejection of grandmother cell theories in neuroscience is due to a misunderstanding about how localist models behave. The author concludes that the localist representations embedded in theories of perception and cognition are consistent with neuroscience; biology only calls into question the distributed representations often learned in PDP models.
A fundamental claim associated with parallel distributed processing (PDP) theories of cognition is that knowledge is coded in a distributed manner in mind and brain. This approach rejects the claim that knowledge is coded in a localist fashion, with words, objects, and simple concepts (e.g. "dog"), that is, coded with their own dedicated representations. One of the putative advantages of this approach is that the theories are biologically plausible. Indeed, advocates of the PDP approach often highlight the close parallels between distributed representations learned in connectionist models and neural coding in brain and often dismiss localist (grandmother cell) theories as biologically implausible. The author reviews a range a data that strongly challenge this claim and shows that localist models provide a better account of single-cell recording studies. The author also contrast local and alternative distributed coding schemes (sparse and coarse coding) and argues that common rejection of grandmother cell theories in neuroscience is due to a misunderstanding about how localist models behave. The author concludes that the localist representations embedded in theories of perception and cognition are consistent with neuroscience; biology only calls into question the distributed representations often learned in PDP models.A fundamental claim associated with parallel distributed processing (PDP) theories of cognition is that knowledge is coded in a distributed manner in mind and brain. This approach rejects the claim that knowledge is coded in a localist fashion, with words, objects, and simple concepts (e.g. "dog"), that is, coded with their own dedicated representations. One of the putative advantages of this approach is that the theories are biologically plausible. Indeed, advocates of the PDP approach often highlight the close parallels between distributed representations learned in connectionist models and neural coding in brain and often dismiss localist (grandmother cell) theories as biologically implausible. The author reviews a range a data that strongly challenge this claim and shows that localist models provide a better account of single-cell recording studies. The author also contrast local and alternative distributed coding schemes (sparse and coarse coding) and argues that common rejection of grandmother cell theories in neuroscience is due to a misunderstanding about how localist models behave. The author concludes that the localist representations embedded in theories of perception and cognition are consistent with neuroscience; biology only calls into question the distributed representations often learned in PDP models.
Author Bowers, Jeffrey S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jeffrey S
  surname: Bowers
  fullname: Bowers, Jeffrey S
  email: j.bowers@bris.ac.uk
  organization: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, England. j.bowers@bris.ac.uk
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19159155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kMtKxDAUhrMYcS4KPoFk5a6apEkv7mTwBgOzUXBX0vR0JpomNWmRgg9vRsfDgbP5zgf_v0Qz6ywgdEHJNSVpfiMJoZxnbIYWhKRpwkrxNkfLEN5JHFqWp2hOSyriigX63lo87AHX2hm300oa3Bs5Bl1ro4cJuxbvvLRN5yLlsQJjwi3WXW8iO2hnA26dxxZGH18tDF_OfxyMzmsIWFvch0ntD_IJR88v6YLSYBWcoZNWmgDnx7tCrw_3L-unZLN9fF7fbRLJCz4komQ5a2hR8CKnLTBCMlpkMoZLGyVKCaoRGZRMCt6kTc5IWrSCcSqJgIxJxlbo6s_be_c5QhiqTodDFGnBjaHKsoKLWEcEL4_gWHfQVL3XnfRT9d8X-wHEA20z
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2022_859874
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_00050
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1232838
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1266370
crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_12192
crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2022_857653
crossref_primary_10_1002_bies_201800248
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2021_147578
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2011_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11098_018_1213_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1267782
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1242760
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540091_2019_1682520
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2009_08_020
crossref_primary_10_1111_theo_12027
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1256490
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_018_01925_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1256491
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1259482
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2012_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_018_1815_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_langsci_2017_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00977_2010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2013_01_010
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2017_00186
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2017_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2015_12_016
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1551_6709_2012_01236_x
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1502_23_2024
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1551_6709_2010_01149_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1756_8765_2010_01116_x
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0054088
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2015_01_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmp_2014_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1235279
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2014_00440
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11571_009_9090_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_02643294_2016_1147426
crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12374
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2011_10_026
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2019_01121
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10796_018_9889_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12559_011_9104_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neunet_2020_06_008
crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2021_612041
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2017_00099
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_64466_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2014_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X19002000
crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_12146
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11571_012_9206_0
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep25025
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_016_1002_0
crossref_primary_10_1521_soco_2012_30_4_367
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plrev_2019_02_014
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540091_2011_568608
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2015_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1163_18758185_01503002
crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2018_00074
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomimetics7030127
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0020996
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1218033
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2016_00095
crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2016_1232420
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tins_2015_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00990_2010
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2023_1295969
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01457
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2018_03_037
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540091_2011_571761
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2744_12_2013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_langsci_2012_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_06_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plrev_2018_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1162_nol_a_00145
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2020_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12559_013_9217_0
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1958_14_2015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10462_017_9608_9
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1004155
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00422_016_0683_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_12007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2018_08_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540091_2011_569880
crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2016_00073
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2023_105404
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neucom_2025_129440
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2017_00313
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1037/a0014462
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
ExternalDocumentID 19159155
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
-ET
-~X
.-4
.GJ
07C
0R~
123
186
29P
354
3EH
41~
53G
5RE
5VS
7RZ
85S
9M8
AAAHA
AAIKC
AAMNW
AAYOK
ABCQX
ABDPE
ABIVO
ABNCP
ABPPZ
ABTAH
ABVOZ
ACGFO
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACPQG
ACTDY
ADMHG
AEHFB
AENEX
AETEA
AFFNX
AGNAY
AIDAL
AJUXI
ALEEW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AWKKM
AZXWR
BKOMP
CGNQK
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
EPA
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
ISO
L7B
LPU
LW5
MVM
NHB
NPM
O9-
OHT
OPA
OVD
P-O
P2P
PHGZT
PQQKQ
QZG
ROL
RXW
SES
SPA
TAE
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
UBC
UHB
UHS
WH7
X7L
XJT
XKC
XOL
XZL
YCJ
YNT
YR5
YXB
YYP
YYQ
ZCA
ZCG
ZGI
ZHY
ZKG
ZPI
ZXP
ZY4
~A~
3KI
7X8
ABUFD
AFFHD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-59272d1884871fe2006186a0333dc59aecd56e92a54d3d72038f5241a05e62a22
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 127
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000262560500010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0033-295X
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 13:46:21 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:09 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a484t-59272d1884871fe2006186a0333dc59aecd56e92a54d3d72038f5241a05e62a22
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 19159155
PQID 66845155
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_66845155
pubmed_primary_19159155
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-Jan
20090101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-Jan
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Psychological review
PublicationTitleAlternate Psychol Rev
PublicationYear 2009
References 20063976 - Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):284-8
20063978 - Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):291-7
References_xml – reference: 20063976 - Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):284-8
– reference: 20063978 - Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):291-7
SSID ssj0000199
Score 2.3438256
Snippet A fundamental claim associated with parallel distributed processing (PDP) theories of cognition is that knowledge is coded in a distributed manner in mind and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 220
SubjectTerms Animals
Association Learning - physiology
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Cognition - physiology
Concept Formation - physiology
Face
Haplorhini
Humans
Mental Recall - physiology
Nerve Net - physiology
Neural Networks (Computer)
Neurons - physiology
Neurosciences
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Psychological Theory
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Species Specificity
Title On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19159155
https://www.proquest.com/docview/66845155
Volume 116
WOSCitedRecordID wos000262560500010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV05T8MwFLYKZejCfZTzDaxRW8d2bISEEKJioXQAKVvkxA6qBEmgLVIlfjzPOaouiIElm3PYL8_fO_x9hFwmVlrKpPXQ0ymPscB4GNkaL2FxLFMm7CBlpdhEMBrJMFTjFrluzsK4tsrGJ5aO2uSJy5H3hJDMyZHcFB-e04xytdVaQGONtH0EMs6mg1CukEepCvyWamU8bKhn_aCnXWTAnELOb7Cy3F6GW_97sW2yWcNKuK3sYIe0bLZLOkvvttgj308ZINiDinXJLQ0Ub3ped8cuIE_hFfct814eyQKX0J9ewWSl4RwQ34Ljv8ShWdU9DuU5SAy2YZJBsXwa4H1ghSnT7pOX4f3z3YNXSy94mkk287iiATUDKTGeGaTW5R0GUmicSt8kXGmbGC6sopoz4xtXypUpRzCg-9wKqik9IOtZntkjAopx1Remr3wmmDZUiiBGx0FjjsGM4UGXXDTzGqFpu8_Tmc3n06iZ2S45rJYmKioGjgiDTO6I7Y__HHtCOlX9xyVNTkk7xZ_anpGN5Gs2mX6elxaD19H48Qeue80a
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On+the+biological+plausibility+of+grandmother+cells%3A+implications+for+neural+network+theories+in+psychology+and+neuroscience&rft.jtitle=Psychological+review&rft.au=Bowers%2C+Jeffrey+S&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=220&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fa0014462&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19159155&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19159155&rft.externalDocID=19159155
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0033-295X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0033-295X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0033-295X&client=summon