Grouping information for judgments
Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Severa...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. General Vol. 140; no. 1; p. 1 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
01.02.2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1939-2222, 1939-2222 |
| Online Access: | Get more information |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Several experiments demonstrate that people can spontaneously pack information into cue groups. Moreover, group-level weighting depends on how people assess similarity or how they think of categorical hierarchies. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Several experiments demonstrate that people can spontaneously pack information into cue groups. Moreover, group-level weighting depends on how people assess similarity or how they think of categorical hierarchies. Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Several experiments demonstrate that people can spontaneously pack information into cue groups. Moreover, group-level weighting depends on how people assess similarity or how they think of categorical hierarchies.Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Several experiments demonstrate that people can spontaneously pack information into cue groups. Moreover, group-level weighting depends on how people assess similarity or how they think of categorical hierarchies. |
| Author | Shah, Anuj K Oppenheimer, Daniel M |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Anuj K surname: Shah fullname: Shah, Anuj K email: akshah@princeton.edu organization: Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Green Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. akshah@princeton.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Daniel M surname: Oppenheimer fullname: Oppenheimer, Daniel M |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNj0tLxDAcxIOsuA8FP4EUL56qeTc5yrKuwoIXPZc8_l26tElN2oPf3oIrOJeZw49hZo0WIQZA6JbgR4JZ9WQwpkRzeYFWRDNd0lmLf3mJ1jmf8Cym5BVaUkK1ZkSu0P0-xWlow7FoQxNTb8Y2hmJOxWnyxx7CmK_RZWO6DDdn36DPl93H9rU8vO_fts-H0nBFx5I5STkwS5S3piEAxIBVjoHGlZBeMOEqMJxaraT3wjoKjZj3KKG8cIrTDXr47R1S_Jogj3XfZgddZwLEKddKYCE5E3Im787kZHvw9ZDa3qTv-u8W_QEUh056 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_obhdp_2020_07_005 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOEM_05_2021_0718 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2012_09_019 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_011_0180_2 crossref_primary_10_1017_S193029750000560X crossref_primary_10_1080_10864415_2016_1121763 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nst031 crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_10273 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tre_2014_10_007 crossref_primary_10_1086_677893 crossref_primary_10_1093_ssjj_jyv034 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0021946 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology |
| EISSN | 1939-2222 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 21299316 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ -ET -~X .GJ 0R~ 186 29K 354 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6TS 7RZ 85S 9M8 AAAHA AAIKC AAMNW ABCQX ABDPE ABIVO ABNCP ABPPZ ABVOZ ACGFO ACNCT ACPQG ADXHL AEHFB AETEA AFFNX ALEEW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AWKKM AZXWR BKOMP CGNQK CGR CS3 CUY CVF D-I ECM EIF EPA F5P FTD HVGLF HZ~ H~9 ISO L7B LPU LW5 MVM NHB NPM O9- OHT OPA OVD P-O P2P PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PZZ ROL RXW SES SPA TAE TEORI TN5 UBC UHB UHS UPT WH7 XJT XOL XZL YQT YR5 YYQ YZZ ZCA ZCG ZHY ZPI ZXP 3KI 7X8 ABUFD AFFHD |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a482t-3c624e3b18dbaf1ee1aeb8c3e90756d535c7ea42b986dd5bc2ef5038858d5c842 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 11 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000286911800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1939-2222 |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 12:02:22 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:45 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a482t-3c624e3b18dbaf1ee1aeb8c3e90756d535c7ea42b986dd5bc2ef5038858d5c842 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 21299316 |
| PQID | 850564356 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_850564356 pubmed_primary_21299316 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2011-02-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2011 text: 2011-02-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of experimental psychology. General |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Exp Psychol Gen |
| PublicationYear | 2011 |
| SSID | ssj0000386 |
| Score | 2.0449238 |
| Snippet | Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Analysis of Variance Cues Decision Making - physiology Female Humans Judgment - physiology Male |
| Title | Grouping information for judgments |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299316 https://www.proquest.com/docview/850564356 |
| Volume | 140 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000286911800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwED4BZejC-1FeihCr1cavOBNCiIoBqg6AukV-BcGQlj6Q-PecnbRMiIHFyhIpsc_3fXc-fwdwJZynDAfCS8sIZ6UgJuOScCus5popF3O6Lw_ZYKBGo3zY1ObMmrLKpU-MjtqNbciRd1WAasR2eT35IKFpVDhcbTporEOLIZMJRp2NfsTCeyw2ekSKkhOEQbrUnmVZVwdsy7n8nVdGfOlv__PLdmCrIZbJTW0Ju7Dmqz1or_zb1z5cxjwTQlXSqKWGNUnwKXlfuNd41e0Anvt3T7f3pGmRQDRXdE6YlZR7ZlLljC5T71PtjbLMY8wrpBNM2MxrTk2upHPCWOrLKAAjlBNWcXoIG9W48seQMGWkQ6himUFO4iQyP8o0RizoAGmvLDuQLH-_QBMM5wq68uPFrFhNQAeO6iksJrVURoHAiAQolSd_v3wK7TpfG0pFzqBV4vbz57BpP-dvs-lFXFocB8PHb4byreY |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grouping+information+for+judgments&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+experimental+psychology.+General&rft.au=Shah%2C+Anuj+K&rft.au=Oppenheimer%2C+Daniel+M&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fa0021946&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21299316&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21299316&rft.externalDocID=21299316 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1939-2222&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1939-2222&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1939-2222&client=summon |