Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life

End-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among select patients who are hospitalized at the end of life. To examine the trends in NIV and IMV...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:JAMA internal medicine Ročník 181; číslo 1; s. 93
Hlavní autoři: Sullivan, Donald R, Kim, Hyosin, Gozalo, Pedro L, Bunker, Jennifer, Teno, Joan M
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: United States 01.01.2021
Témata:
ISSN:2168-6114, 2168-6114
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract End-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among select patients who are hospitalized at the end of life. To examine the trends in NIV and IMV use among decedents with a hospitalization in the last 30 days of life. This population-based cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had an acute care hospitalization in the last 30 days of life and died between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017. Sociodemographic, diagnosis, and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare claims data. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to July 2020. Use of NIV or IMV. Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were reviewed to identify use of NIV, IMV, both NIV and IMV, or none. Four subcohorts of Medicare beneficiaries were identified using primary admitting diagnosis codes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], congested heart failure [CHF], cancer, and dementia). Measures of end-of-life care included in-hospital death (acute care setting), hospice enrollment at death, and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life. Random-effects logistic regression examined NIV and IMV use adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and comorbidities. A total of 2 470 435 Medicare beneficiaries (1 353 798 women [54.8%]; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [8.2] years) were hospitalized within 30 days of death. Compared with 2000, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the increase in NIV use was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.46-2.82; % receipt: 0.8% vs 2.0%) for 2005 and 11.84 (95% CI, 11.11-12.61; % receipt: 0.8% vs 7.1%) for 2017. Compared with 2000, the AOR for the increase in IMV use was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.06; % receipt: 15.0% vs 15.2%) for 2005 and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.59-1.66; % receipt: 15.0% vs 18.2%) for 2017. In subanalyses comparing 2017 with 2000, similar trends found increased NIV among patients with CHF (% receipt: 1.4% vs 14.2%; AOR, 14.14 [95% CI, 11.77-16.98]) and COPD (% receipt: 2.7% vs 14.5%; AOR, 8.22 [95% CI, 6.42-10.52]), with reciprocal stabilization in IMV use among patients with CHF (% receipt: 11.1% vs 7.8%; AOR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.19]) and COPD (% receipt: 17.4% vs 13.2%; AOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]). The AOR for increased NIV use was 10.82 (95% CI, 8.16-14.34; % receipt: 0.4% vs 3.5%) among decedents with cancer and 9.62 (95% CI, 7.61-12.15; % receipt: 0.6% vs 5.2%) among decedents with dementia. The AOR for increased IMV use was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.26-1.55; % receipt: 6.2% vs 7.6%) among decedents with cancer and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41; % receipt: 5.7% vs 6.2%) among decedents with dementia. Among decedents with NIV vs IMV use, lower rates of in-hospital death (50.3% [95% CI, 49.3%-51.3%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 75.9%-77.5%]) and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life (57.7% [95% CI, 56.2%-59.3%] vs 63.0% [95% CI, 60.9%-65.1%]) were observed along with higher rates of hospice enrollment (41.3% [95% CI, 40.4%-42.3%] vs 20.0% [95% CI, 19.2%-20.7%]). This study found that the use of NIV rapidly increased from 2000 through 2017 among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life, especially among persons with cancer and dementia. The findings suggest that trials to evaluate the outcomes of NIV are warranted to inform discussions about the goals of this therapy between clinicians and patients and their health care proxies.
AbstractList End-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among select patients who are hospitalized at the end of life. To examine the trends in NIV and IMV use among decedents with a hospitalization in the last 30 days of life. This population-based cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had an acute care hospitalization in the last 30 days of life and died between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017. Sociodemographic, diagnosis, and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare claims data. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to July 2020. Use of NIV or IMV. Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were reviewed to identify use of NIV, IMV, both NIV and IMV, or none. Four subcohorts of Medicare beneficiaries were identified using primary admitting diagnosis codes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], congested heart failure [CHF], cancer, and dementia). Measures of end-of-life care included in-hospital death (acute care setting), hospice enrollment at death, and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life. Random-effects logistic regression examined NIV and IMV use adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and comorbidities. A total of 2 470 435 Medicare beneficiaries (1 353 798 women [54.8%]; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [8.2] years) were hospitalized within 30 days of death. Compared with 2000, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the increase in NIV use was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.46-2.82; % receipt: 0.8% vs 2.0%) for 2005 and 11.84 (95% CI, 11.11-12.61; % receipt: 0.8% vs 7.1%) for 2017. Compared with 2000, the AOR for the increase in IMV use was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.06; % receipt: 15.0% vs 15.2%) for 2005 and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.59-1.66; % receipt: 15.0% vs 18.2%) for 2017. In subanalyses comparing 2017 with 2000, similar trends found increased NIV among patients with CHF (% receipt: 1.4% vs 14.2%; AOR, 14.14 [95% CI, 11.77-16.98]) and COPD (% receipt: 2.7% vs 14.5%; AOR, 8.22 [95% CI, 6.42-10.52]), with reciprocal stabilization in IMV use among patients with CHF (% receipt: 11.1% vs 7.8%; AOR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.19]) and COPD (% receipt: 17.4% vs 13.2%; AOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]). The AOR for increased NIV use was 10.82 (95% CI, 8.16-14.34; % receipt: 0.4% vs 3.5%) among decedents with cancer and 9.62 (95% CI, 7.61-12.15; % receipt: 0.6% vs 5.2%) among decedents with dementia. The AOR for increased IMV use was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.26-1.55; % receipt: 6.2% vs 7.6%) among decedents with cancer and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41; % receipt: 5.7% vs 6.2%) among decedents with dementia. Among decedents with NIV vs IMV use, lower rates of in-hospital death (50.3% [95% CI, 49.3%-51.3%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 75.9%-77.5%]) and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life (57.7% [95% CI, 56.2%-59.3%] vs 63.0% [95% CI, 60.9%-65.1%]) were observed along with higher rates of hospice enrollment (41.3% [95% CI, 40.4%-42.3%] vs 20.0% [95% CI, 19.2%-20.7%]). This study found that the use of NIV rapidly increased from 2000 through 2017 among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life, especially among persons with cancer and dementia. The findings suggest that trials to evaluate the outcomes of NIV are warranted to inform discussions about the goals of this therapy between clinicians and patients and their health care proxies.
End-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among select patients who are hospitalized at the end of life.ImportanceEnd-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among select patients who are hospitalized at the end of life.To examine the trends in NIV and IMV use among decedents with a hospitalization in the last 30 days of life.ObjectiveTo examine the trends in NIV and IMV use among decedents with a hospitalization in the last 30 days of life.This population-based cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had an acute care hospitalization in the last 30 days of life and died between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017. Sociodemographic, diagnosis, and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare claims data. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to July 2020.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had an acute care hospitalization in the last 30 days of life and died between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017. Sociodemographic, diagnosis, and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare claims data. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to July 2020.Use of NIV or IMV.ExposuresUse of NIV or IMV.Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were reviewed to identify use of NIV, IMV, both NIV and IMV, or none. Four subcohorts of Medicare beneficiaries were identified using primary admitting diagnosis codes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], congested heart failure [CHF], cancer, and dementia). Measures of end-of-life care included in-hospital death (acute care setting), hospice enrollment at death, and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life. Random-effects logistic regression examined NIV and IMV use adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and comorbidities.Main Outcomes and MeasuresValidated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were reviewed to identify use of NIV, IMV, both NIV and IMV, or none. Four subcohorts of Medicare beneficiaries were identified using primary admitting diagnosis codes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], congested heart failure [CHF], cancer, and dementia). Measures of end-of-life care included in-hospital death (acute care setting), hospice enrollment at death, and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life. Random-effects logistic regression examined NIV and IMV use adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and comorbidities.A total of 2 470 435 Medicare beneficiaries (1 353 798 women [54.8%]; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [8.2] years) were hospitalized within 30 days of death. Compared with 2000, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the increase in NIV use was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.46-2.82; % receipt: 0.8% vs 2.0%) for 2005 and 11.84 (95% CI, 11.11-12.61; % receipt: 0.8% vs 7.1%) for 2017. Compared with 2000, the AOR for the increase in IMV use was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.06; % receipt: 15.0% vs 15.2%) for 2005 and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.59-1.66; % receipt: 15.0% vs 18.2%) for 2017. In subanalyses comparing 2017 with 2000, similar trends found increased NIV among patients with CHF (% receipt: 1.4% vs 14.2%; AOR, 14.14 [95% CI, 11.77-16.98]) and COPD (% receipt: 2.7% vs 14.5%; AOR, 8.22 [95% CI, 6.42-10.52]), with reciprocal stabilization in IMV use among patients with CHF (% receipt: 11.1% vs 7.8%; AOR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.19]) and COPD (% receipt: 17.4% vs 13.2%; AOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]). The AOR for increased NIV use was 10.82 (95% CI, 8.16-14.34; % receipt: 0.4% vs 3.5%) among decedents with cancer and 9.62 (95% CI, 7.61-12.15; % receipt: 0.6% vs 5.2%) among decedents with dementia. The AOR for increased IMV use was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.26-1.55; % receipt: 6.2% vs 7.6%) among decedents with cancer and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41; % receipt: 5.7% vs 6.2%) among decedents with dementia. Among decedents with NIV vs IMV use, lower rates of in-hospital death (50.3% [95% CI, 49.3%-51.3%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 75.9%-77.5%]) and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life (57.7% [95% CI, 56.2%-59.3%] vs 63.0% [95% CI, 60.9%-65.1%]) were observed along with higher rates of hospice enrollment (41.3% [95% CI, 40.4%-42.3%] vs 20.0% [95% CI, 19.2%-20.7%]).ResultsA total of 2 470 435 Medicare beneficiaries (1 353 798 women [54.8%]; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [8.2] years) were hospitalized within 30 days of death. Compared with 2000, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for the increase in NIV use was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.46-2.82; % receipt: 0.8% vs 2.0%) for 2005 and 11.84 (95% CI, 11.11-12.61; % receipt: 0.8% vs 7.1%) for 2017. Compared with 2000, the AOR for the increase in IMV use was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.06; % receipt: 15.0% vs 15.2%) for 2005 and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.59-1.66; % receipt: 15.0% vs 18.2%) for 2017. In subanalyses comparing 2017 with 2000, similar trends found increased NIV among patients with CHF (% receipt: 1.4% vs 14.2%; AOR, 14.14 [95% CI, 11.77-16.98]) and COPD (% receipt: 2.7% vs 14.5%; AOR, 8.22 [95% CI, 6.42-10.52]), with reciprocal stabilization in IMV use among patients with CHF (% receipt: 11.1% vs 7.8%; AOR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.19]) and COPD (% receipt: 17.4% vs 13.2%; AOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]). The AOR for increased NIV use was 10.82 (95% CI, 8.16-14.34; % receipt: 0.4% vs 3.5%) among decedents with cancer and 9.62 (95% CI, 7.61-12.15; % receipt: 0.6% vs 5.2%) among decedents with dementia. The AOR for increased IMV use was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.26-1.55; % receipt: 6.2% vs 7.6%) among decedents with cancer and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41; % receipt: 5.7% vs 6.2%) among decedents with dementia. Among decedents with NIV vs IMV use, lower rates of in-hospital death (50.3% [95% CI, 49.3%-51.3%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 75.9%-77.5%]) and hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life (57.7% [95% CI, 56.2%-59.3%] vs 63.0% [95% CI, 60.9%-65.1%]) were observed along with higher rates of hospice enrollment (41.3% [95% CI, 40.4%-42.3%] vs 20.0% [95% CI, 19.2%-20.7%]).This study found that the use of NIV rapidly increased from 2000 through 2017 among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life, especially among persons with cancer and dementia. The findings suggest that trials to evaluate the outcomes of NIV are warranted to inform discussions about the goals of this therapy between clinicians and patients and their health care proxies.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that the use of NIV rapidly increased from 2000 through 2017 among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life, especially among persons with cancer and dementia. The findings suggest that trials to evaluate the outcomes of NIV are warranted to inform discussions about the goals of this therapy between clinicians and patients and their health care proxies.
Author Sullivan, Donald R
Bunker, Jennifer
Kim, Hyosin
Gozalo, Pedro L
Teno, Joan M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Donald R
  surname: Sullivan
  fullname: Sullivan, Donald R
  organization: Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hyosin
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Hyosin
  organization: Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Pedro L
  surname: Gozalo
  fullname: Gozalo, Pedro L
  organization: Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jennifer
  surname: Bunker
  fullname: Bunker, Jennifer
  organization: Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Joan M
  surname: Teno
  fullname: Teno, Joan M
  organization: Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNUE1PwkAQ3RiMIPIXdI9eivvVbXtEgkqCekGvzdDOypJ2it1C4r-3Rkmcy5uX9-Yl8y7ZgBpCxm6kmEoh5N0OavDUYUs1llMllJjG1ogzNlLSppGV0gz-7UM2CWEn-kmFMFpfsKHWIjFaiRHz6xapDNwTf2nI0xGCPyIHKvnyRJ6x2AL5Air-jtT5CjrfEJ_VDX30YtkrLfJ7JHS-8NB6DBw63m2RL_qcxvGVd3jFzh1UASd_OGZvD4v1_ClavT4u57NVBMaaLrIGs0QkDktpTGydsi52mUoQNi7eKNE_CtqgyJRGG7s0y0qTGlSukFlaWK3G7PY3d982nwcMXV77UGBVAWFzCLkyseqvVfxjvf6zHjZ9lfm-9TW0X_mpHvUNK_lsug
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_27610
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_18196
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14145033
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_17680
crossref_primary_10_1097_CCM_0000000000005827
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecinn_2023_100241
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_19100
crossref_primary_10_1093_geront_gnae131
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12904_024_01365_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_17564
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0281447
crossref_primary_10_3390_diseases11040151
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_19119
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2022_02_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2024_04_021
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_20388
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_021_06794_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_022_07007_4
crossref_primary_10_1513_AnnalsATS_202308_694OC
crossref_primary_10_1542_hpeds_2024_007999
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamainternmed_2023_2371
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00063_023_01061_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2025_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2024_089835
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_33143
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmed_2023_107223
crossref_primary_10_1093_geront_gnac160
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_048344
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsmc_2024_04_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00063_023_01016_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40463_023_00662_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_10499091221134030
crossref_primary_10_1097_CCE_0000000000000574
crossref_primary_10_1177_17474930251338611
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5640
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2168-6114
ExternalDocumentID 33074320
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIA NIH HHS
  grantid: R56 AG063748
GroupedDBID 0R~
4.4
53G
AAGZG
AARDX
AAWTL
ABBLC
ABJNI
ABPMR
ACDNT
ACGFS
ADBBV
AENEX
AFCHL
AGFXO
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJDE
ANMPU
BRYMA
C45
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBD
EBS
ECM
EIF
EMOBN
EX3
H13
HF~
NPM
OB2
OBH
OCB
OGEVE
OHH
OVD
PQQKQ
RAJ
SV3
TEORI
WH7
WOW
YCJ
YYP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-64e9707fed14456f26f5f927eabf5b20640a34e0923e65f899d484e2fc198c632
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 34
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000587482100010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2168-6114
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 14:14:06 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:31:13 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a464t-64e9707fed14456f26f5f927eabf5b20640a34e0923e65f899d484e2fc198c632
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/2771820/jamainternal_sullivan_2020_oi_200081_1609365335.89341.pdf
PMID 33074320
PQID 2452092253
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2452092253
pubmed_primary_33074320
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle JAMA internal medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate JAMA Intern Med
PublicationYear 2021
References 33074308 - JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):102-103. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5648
References_xml – reference: 33074308 - JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):102-103. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5648
SSID ssj0000800433
Score 2.4999495
Snippet End-of-life care is costly, and decedents often experience overtreatment or low-quality care. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be a palliative approach to...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 93
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Noninvasive Ventilation - trends
Terminal Care - trends
United States
Title Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074320
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2452092253
Volume 181
WOSCitedRecordID wos000587482100010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8MwDI6AIcSF92O8FCSuhS5N0vSEBtoEEqt2ALRblbWO1Es7trHfj90HnJCQuFTqoa_Ytf3ZX2zGbiJtenrqUAIGtCcNYlZj_cxDZ47eWhtwvquGTYRxbCaTaNwk3BYNrbK1iZWhzsqUcuR3VCH0I9S-4H724dHUKKquNiM01lknwFCGtDqcmO8cC0VDspomL_CxiJJ6sqV4NY2H8irthn4HkaLwb5WW_u-hZuVyhrv_fdk9ttMEm7xfa8c-W4PigG2NmnL6IctrRizPCx5TWnZliczObZHx5_ZkBLQ3mETJ34lZVHPneJ-GFPG6zDMH_oAms-pFQcib2yXHuJIP8D6l4y-5gyP2Nhy8Pj55zewFz0otl56WEIV-6CBDxKW0E9opF4kQ7NSpqaD6nw0k4EcGoJVD1JZJI0G4tBeZVAfimG0UZQGnjFva-4peL1MpgvFU2ghSYSOrlAapjeyy63YRE9RtKljYAsrPRfKzjF12UksimdVNOJIgoOBH-Gd_uPqcbQuiolSZkwvWcfhnwyXbTFfLfDG_qpQGj_F49AWGkcrR
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends+in+Noninvasive+and+Invasive+Mechanical+Ventilation+Among+Medicare+Beneficiaries+at+the+End+of+Life&rft.jtitle=JAMA+internal+medicine&rft.au=Sullivan%2C+Donald+R&rft.au=Kim%2C+Hyosin&rft.au=Gozalo%2C+Pedro+L&rft.au=Bunker%2C+Jennifer&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.eissn=2168-6114&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001%2Fjamainternmed.2020.5640&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33074320&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33074320&rft.externalDocID=33074320
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2168-6114&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2168-6114&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2168-6114&client=summon