Mechanism and activity of ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts: the role of ligands and substrates from a theoretical perspective

The reaction mechanism of olefin metathesis by ruthenium carbene catalysts is studied by gradient-corrected density functional calculations (BP86). Alternative reaction mechanisms for the reaction of the "first-generation" Grubbs-type catalyst (PCy(3))(2)Cl(2)Ru=CH(2) (1) for the reaction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 126; no. 11; p. 3496
Main Authors: Adlhart, Christian, Chen, Peter
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 24.03.2004
ISSN:0002-7863
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The reaction mechanism of olefin metathesis by ruthenium carbene catalysts is studied by gradient-corrected density functional calculations (BP86). Alternative reaction mechanisms for the reaction of the "first-generation" Grubbs-type catalyst (PCy(3))(2)Cl(2)Ru=CH(2) (1) for the reaction with ethylene are studied. The most likely dissociative mechanism with trans olefin coordination is investigated for the metathesis reaction between the "first-" and the "second-generation" Grubbs-type catalysts 1 and (H(2)IMes)(PCy(3))Cl(2)Ru=CH(2) (2) with different substrates, ethylene, ethyl vinyl ether, and norbornene, and a profound influence of the substrate is found. In contrast to the degenerate reaction with ethylene, the reactions with ethyl vinyl ether and norbornene are strongly exergonic by 8-15 kcal/mol, and this excess energy is released after passing through the metallacyclobutane structure. While the metallacyclobutane is in a deep potential minimum for degenerate metathesis reactions, the energy barrier for the [2+2] cycloreversion vanishes for the most exergonic reactions. On the free energy surface under typical experimental conditions, the rate-limiting steps for the overall reactions are then either metallacyclobutane formation for 1 or phosphane ligand dissociation for 2.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-7863
DOI:10.1021/ja0305757