Extracting the truth from conflicting eyewitness reports: a formal modeling approach
Eyewitnesses often report details of the witnessed crime incorrectly. However, there is usually more than 1 eyewitness observing a crime scene. If this is the case, one approach to reconstruct the details of a crime more accurately is aggregating across individual reports. Although aggregation likel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Applied Jg. 18; H. 4; S. 390 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
01.12.2012
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1939-2192, 1939-2192 |
| Online-Zugang: | Weitere Angaben |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Eyewitnesses often report details of the witnessed crime incorrectly. However, there is usually more than 1 eyewitness observing a crime scene. If this is the case, one approach to reconstruct the details of a crime more accurately is aggregating across individual reports. Although aggregation likely improves accuracy, the degree of improvement largely depends on the method of aggregation. The most straightforward method is the majority rule. This method ignores individual differences between eyewitnesses and selects the answer shared by most eyewitnesses as being correct. We employ an alternative method based on cultural consensus theory (CCT) that accounts for differences in the eyewitnesses' knowledge. To test the validity of this approach, we showed 30 students 1 of 2 versions of a video depicting a heated quarrel between 2 people. The videos differed in the amount of information pertaining to the critical event. Participants then answered questions about the critical event. Analyses based on CCT rendered highly accurate eyewitness competence estimates that mirrored the amount of information available in the video. Moreover, CCT estimates resulted in a more precise reconstruction of the video content than the majority rule did. This was true for group sizes ranging from 4 to 15 eyewitnesses, with the difference being more pronounced for larger groups. Thus, through simultaneous consideration of multiple witness statements, CCT provides a new approach to the assessment of eyewitness accuracy that outperforms standard methods of information aggregation. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Eyewitnesses often report details of the witnessed crime incorrectly. However, there is usually more than 1 eyewitness observing a crime scene. If this is the case, one approach to reconstruct the details of a crime more accurately is aggregating across individual reports. Although aggregation likely improves accuracy, the degree of improvement largely depends on the method of aggregation. The most straightforward method is the majority rule. This method ignores individual differences between eyewitnesses and selects the answer shared by most eyewitnesses as being correct. We employ an alternative method based on cultural consensus theory (CCT) that accounts for differences in the eyewitnesses' knowledge. To test the validity of this approach, we showed 30 students 1 of 2 versions of a video depicting a heated quarrel between 2 people. The videos differed in the amount of information pertaining to the critical event. Participants then answered questions about the critical event. Analyses based on CCT rendered highly accurate eyewitness competence estimates that mirrored the amount of information available in the video. Moreover, CCT estimates resulted in a more precise reconstruction of the video content than the majority rule did. This was true for group sizes ranging from 4 to 15 eyewitnesses, with the difference being more pronounced for larger groups. Thus, through simultaneous consideration of multiple witness statements, CCT provides a new approach to the assessment of eyewitness accuracy that outperforms standard methods of information aggregation. Eyewitnesses often report details of the witnessed crime incorrectly. However, there is usually more than 1 eyewitness observing a crime scene. If this is the case, one approach to reconstruct the details of a crime more accurately is aggregating across individual reports. Although aggregation likely improves accuracy, the degree of improvement largely depends on the method of aggregation. The most straightforward method is the majority rule. This method ignores individual differences between eyewitnesses and selects the answer shared by most eyewitnesses as being correct. We employ an alternative method based on cultural consensus theory (CCT) that accounts for differences in the eyewitnesses' knowledge. To test the validity of this approach, we showed 30 students 1 of 2 versions of a video depicting a heated quarrel between 2 people. The videos differed in the amount of information pertaining to the critical event. Participants then answered questions about the critical event. Analyses based on CCT rendered highly accurate eyewitness competence estimates that mirrored the amount of information available in the video. Moreover, CCT estimates resulted in a more precise reconstruction of the video content than the majority rule did. This was true for group sizes ranging from 4 to 15 eyewitnesses, with the difference being more pronounced for larger groups. Thus, through simultaneous consideration of multiple witness statements, CCT provides a new approach to the assessment of eyewitness accuracy that outperforms standard methods of information aggregation.Eyewitnesses often report details of the witnessed crime incorrectly. However, there is usually more than 1 eyewitness observing a crime scene. If this is the case, one approach to reconstruct the details of a crime more accurately is aggregating across individual reports. Although aggregation likely improves accuracy, the degree of improvement largely depends on the method of aggregation. The most straightforward method is the majority rule. This method ignores individual differences between eyewitnesses and selects the answer shared by most eyewitnesses as being correct. We employ an alternative method based on cultural consensus theory (CCT) that accounts for differences in the eyewitnesses' knowledge. To test the validity of this approach, we showed 30 students 1 of 2 versions of a video depicting a heated quarrel between 2 people. The videos differed in the amount of information pertaining to the critical event. Participants then answered questions about the critical event. Analyses based on CCT rendered highly accurate eyewitness competence estimates that mirrored the amount of information available in the video. Moreover, CCT estimates resulted in a more precise reconstruction of the video content than the majority rule did. This was true for group sizes ranging from 4 to 15 eyewitnesses, with the difference being more pronounced for larger groups. Thus, through simultaneous consideration of multiple witness statements, CCT provides a new approach to the assessment of eyewitness accuracy that outperforms standard methods of information aggregation. |
| Author | Waubert de Puiseau, Berenike Bernstein, Daniel M Aßfalg, André Erdfelder, Edgar |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Berenike surname: Waubert de Puiseau fullname: Waubert de Puiseau, Berenike organization: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: André surname: Aßfalg fullname: Aßfalg, André – sequence: 3 givenname: Edgar surname: Erdfelder fullname: Erdfelder, Edgar – sequence: 4 givenname: Daniel M surname: Bernstein fullname: Bernstein, Daniel M |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkEtLxDAUhYOMOA8Ff4Fk6aaa3HTaXHcyjA8YcDOuS5ImTqVtapKi8-8dGQVX53DPx7lw5mTS-94ScsnZDWeivFWMAUrGT8iMo8AMOMLkn5-SeYzvjDGJmJ-RKQgmZS7KGdmuv1JQJjX9G007S1MY04664DtqfO_a5hjZvf1sUm9jpMEOPqR4RxV1PnSqpZ2vbftDqWEIXpndOTl1qo324lcX5PVhvV09ZZuXx-fV_SZTOeMpU-BqUGAKo7nUegk5yAKFAqwN5gVq1IcT4tKUoLQx4BxHq8vcyaUxDGBBro-9h7cfo42p6ppobNuq3voxVhxKIViBZX5Ar37RUXe2robQdCrsq78l4BvKOGF8 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_0081175014529767 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12671_022_01956_x crossref_primary_10_1177_0265407517724600 crossref_primary_10_5406_amerjpsyc_128_1_0061 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0029801 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology |
| EISSN | 1939-2192 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 23088437 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ 0R~ 29K 354 5GY 5VS 7RZ 8VB 9M8 ABIVO ABNCP ABVOZ ACGFO ACPQG AEHFB AEMOZ AETEA AHQJS AI. AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AWKKM AZXWR CGNQK CGR CS3 CUY CVF D-I EBR EBU ECM EIF EMK EPA F5P FTD HVGLF HZ~ ISO K1G LW5 NPM O9- OPA OVD P2P PHGZM PHGZT QWB ROL SES SPA TEORI TH9 TN5 UHS UPT VH1 WH7 YQT ZL0 ZPI 3KI 7X8 PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-a2fd2a2c6cb18bb52428693a29dc9469b9b242995c72abcc2ff19eb74f85cc022 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 19 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000312919800005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1939-2192 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:05:24 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:17 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a401t-a2fd2a2c6cb18bb52428693a29dc9469b9b242995c72abcc2ff19eb74f85cc022 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 23088437 |
| PQID | 1273306974 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1273306974 pubmed_primary_23088437 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2012 text: 2012-12-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of experimental psychology. Applied |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Exp Psychol Appl |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| SSID | ssj0008994 |
| Score | 2.0893373 |
| Snippet | Eyewitnesses often report details of the witnessed crime incorrectly. However, there is usually more than 1 eyewitness observing a crime scene. If this is the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 390 |
| SubjectTerms | Crime Humans Mental Recall Models, Theoretical |
| Title | Extracting the truth from conflicting eyewitness reports: a formal modeling approach |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088437 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1273306974 |
| Volume | 18 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000312919800005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELaAMnTh_SgvGYnVamMnccyCEGrFQtWhSN0i27GhEkpLkwL995ydhE5ISCzJkEsUnc533_l83yF0A0YTJVlmCVNUkdCEEVHMxiTWgF-Vkj3GrB82wYfDZDIRo3rDraiPVTY-0TvqbKbdHnk3gDgL8Bbg7938nbipUa66Wo_Q2EQtBlDGWTWfrNnCIZeoq8qCwMqkDfks413pucd7we_A0geYwe5_f20P7dTQEt9XtrCPNkx-gNo_Hm51iMb9r9J3ReUvGIAfLhfL8hW7DhOsm_YQeGRW5nNaOh-I65LCLZbYo9s37EfnOKmGjfwIPQ_644dHUo9VIBKSqZJIajMqqY61ChKlIgjSSSyYpCLTArJlJRR1USrSnEqlNbU2EEbx0CaR1hDzj9FWPsvNKcIs5AZkAXPAzXAjQFCqkIVSwqe57aDrRmMpmK2rRcjczJZFutZZB51Uak_nFb9GCllRkoSMn_3h7XPUBghDqwMmF6hlYdGaS7StP8ppsbjy9gDX4ejpG_9nwZY |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extracting+the+truth+from+conflicting+eyewitness+reports%3A+a+formal+modeling+approach&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+experimental+psychology.+Applied&rft.au=Waubert+de+Puiseau%2C+Berenike&rft.au=A%C3%9Ffalg%2C+Andr%C3%A9&rft.au=Erdfelder%2C+Edgar&rft.au=Bernstein%2C+Daniel+M&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.issn=1939-2192&rft.eissn=1939-2192&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fa0029801&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1939-2192&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1939-2192&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1939-2192&client=summon |