The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions

As illustrated by the mistaken, high-profile fingerprint identification of Brandon Mayfield in the Madrid Bomber case, and consistent with a recent critique by the National Academy of Sciences (2009), it is clear that the forensic sciences are subject to contextual bias and fraught with error. In th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied research in memory and cognition Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 42 - 52
Main Authors: Kassin, Saul M., Dror, Itiel E., Kukucka, Jeff
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Science 01.03.2013
Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Subjects:
Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive Bias
Confirmation Bias
Context effects
Expectancy effects
Forensic Evaluation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Memory
Miscellaneous
Observers
Primacy Effect
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Witnesses
Context effects
Confirmation bias
Expectancy effects
Context
Human
Justice
Forensic science
Cognition
Review
Expectation
Cognitive bias
ISSN:2211-3681, 2211-369X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As illustrated by the mistaken, high-profile fingerprint identification of Brandon Mayfield in the Madrid Bomber case, and consistent with a recent critique by the National Academy of Sciences (2009), it is clear that the forensic sciences are subject to contextual bias and fraught with error. In this article, we describe classic psychological research on primacy, expectancy effects, and observer effects, all of which indicate that context can taint people's perceptions, judgments, and behaviors. Then we describe recent studies indicating that confessions and other types of information can set into motion forensic confirmation biases that corrupt lay witness perceptions and memories as well as the judgments of experts in various domains of forensic science. Finally, we propose best practices that would reduce bias in the forensic laboratory as well as its influence in the courts. Highlights ► The forensic sciences are subject to contextual bias and fraught with error. ► Basic psychology shows that context can taint perception, judgment, and behavior. ► Newer studies find that biasing information likewise impacts forensic scientists. ► Recommendations are given to reduce the effect of bias in forensic labs and courts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:2211-3681
2211-369X
DOI:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001