Modular Primal-Dual Fixpoint Logic Solving for Temporal Verification

We present a novel approach to deciding the validity of formulas in first-order fixpoint logic with background theories and arbitrarily nested inductive and co-inductive predicates defining least and greatest fixpoints. Our approach is constraint-based, and reduces the validity checking problem of t...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Proceedings of ACM on programming languages Ročník 7; číslo POPL; s. 2111 - 2140
Hlavní autoři: Unno, Hiroshi, Terauchi, Tachio, Gu, Yu, Koskinen, Eric
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: New York, NY, USA ACM 09.01.2023
Témata:
ISSN:2475-1421, 2475-1421
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract We present a novel approach to deciding the validity of formulas in first-order fixpoint logic with background theories and arbitrarily nested inductive and co-inductive predicates defining least and greatest fixpoints. Our approach is constraint-based, and reduces the validity checking problem of the given first-order-fixpoint logic formula (formally, an instance in a language called µCLP) to a constraint satisfaction problem for a recently introduced predicate constraint language. Coupled with an existing sound-and-relatively-complete solver for the constraint language, this novel reduction alone already gives a sound and relatively complete method for deciding µCLP validity, but we further improve it to a novel modular primal-dual method. The key observations are (1) µCLP is closed under complement such that each (co-)inductive predicate in the original primal instance has a corresponding (co-)inductive predicate representing its complement in the dual instance obtained by taking the standard De Morgan’s dual of the primal instance, and (2) partial solutions for (co-)inductive predicates synthesized during the constraint solving process of the primal side can be used as sound upper-bounds of the corresponding (co-)inductive predicates in the dual side, and vice versa. By solving the primal and dual problems in parallel and exchanging each others’ partial solutions as sound bounds, the two processes mutually reduce each others’ solution spaces, thus enabling rapid convergence. The approach is also modular in that the bounds are synthesized and exchanged at granularity of individual (co-)inductive predicates. We demonstrate the utility of our novel fixpoint logic solving by encoding a wide variety of temporal verification problems in µCLP, including termination/non-termination, LTL, CTL, and even the full modal µ-calculus model checking of infinite state programs. The encodings exploit the modularity in both the program and the property by expressing each loops and (recursive) functions in the program and sub-formulas of the property as individual (possibly nested) (co-)inductive predicates. Together with our novel modular primal-dual µCLP solving, we obtain a novel approach to efficiently solving a wide range of temporal verification problems.
AbstractList We present a novel approach to deciding the validity of formulas in first-order fixpoint logic with background theories and arbitrarily nested inductive and co-inductive predicates defining least and greatest fixpoints. Our approach is constraint-based, and reduces the validity checking problem of the given first-order-fixpoint logic formula (formally, an instance in a language called µCLP) to a constraint satisfaction problem for a recently introduced predicate constraint language. Coupled with an existing sound-and-relatively-complete solver for the constraint language, this novel reduction alone already gives a sound and relatively complete method for deciding µCLP validity, but we further improve it to a novel modular primal-dual method. The key observations are (1) µCLP is closed under complement such that each (co-)inductive predicate in the original primal instance has a corresponding (co-)inductive predicate representing its complement in the dual instance obtained by taking the standard De Morgan’s dual of the primal instance, and (2) partial solutions for (co-)inductive predicates synthesized during the constraint solving process of the primal side can be used as sound upper-bounds of the corresponding (co-)inductive predicates in the dual side, and vice versa. By solving the primal and dual problems in parallel and exchanging each others’ partial solutions as sound bounds, the two processes mutually reduce each others’ solution spaces, thus enabling rapid convergence. The approach is also modular in that the bounds are synthesized and exchanged at granularity of individual (co-)inductive predicates. We demonstrate the utility of our novel fixpoint logic solving by encoding a wide variety of temporal verification problems in µCLP, including termination/non-termination, LTL, CTL, and even the full modal µ-calculus model checking of infinite state programs. The encodings exploit the modularity in both the program and the property by expressing each loops and (recursive) functions in the program and sub-formulas of the property as individual (possibly nested) (co-)inductive predicates. Together with our novel modular primal-dual µCLP solving, we obtain a novel approach to efficiently solving a wide range of temporal verification problems.
We present a novel approach to deciding the validity of formulas in first-order fixpoint logic with background theories and arbitrarily nested inductive and co-inductive predicates defining least and greatest fixpoints. Our approach is constraint-based, and reduces the validity checking problem of the given first-order-fixpoint logic formula (formally, an instance in a language called µCLP) to a constraint satisfaction problem for a recently introduced predicate constraint language. Coupled with an existing sound-and-relatively-complete solver for the constraint language, this novel reduction alone already gives a sound and relatively complete method for deciding µCLP validity, but we further improve it to a novel modular primal-dual method. The key observations are (1) µCLP is closed under complement such that each (co-)inductive predicate in the original primal instance has a corresponding (co-)inductive predicate representing its complement in the dual instance obtained by taking the standard De Morgan’s dual of the primal instance, and (2) partial solutions for (co-)inductive predicates synthesized during the constraint solving process of the primal side can be used as sound upper-bounds of the corresponding (co-)inductive predicates in the dual side, and vice versa. By solving the primal and dual problems in parallel and exchanging each others’ partial solutions as sound bounds, the two processes mutually reduce each others’ solution spaces, thus enabling rapid convergence. The approach is also modular in that the bounds are synthesized and exchanged at granularity of individual (co-)inductive predicates. We demonstrate the utility of our novel fixpoint logic solving by encoding a wide variety of temporal verification problems in µCLP, including termination/non-termination, LTL, CTL, and even the full modal µ-calculus model checking of infinite state programs. The encodings exploit the modularity in both the program and the property by expressing each loops and (recursive) functions in the program and sub-formulas of the property as individual (possibly nested) (co-)inductive predicates. Together with our novel modular primal-dual µCLP solving, we obtain a novel approach to efficiently solving a wide range of temporal verification problems.
ArticleNumber 72
Author Gu, Yu
Unno, Hiroshi
Terauchi, Tachio
Koskinen, Eric
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hiroshi
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4225-8195
  surname: Unno
  fullname: Unno, Hiroshi
  email: uhiro@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp
  organization: University of Tsukuba, Japan / RIKEN AIP, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tachio
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5305-4916
  surname: Terauchi
  fullname: Terauchi, Tachio
  email: terauchi@waseda.ac.jp
  organization: Waseda University, Japan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yu
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0036-8967
  surname: Gu
  fullname: Gu, Yu
  email: kou@logic.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp
  organization: University of Tsukuba, Japan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Eric
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7363-634X
  surname: Koskinen
  fullname: Koskinen, Eric
  email: ekoskine@stevens.edu
  organization: Stevens Institute of Technology, USA
BookMark eNpt0E1Lw0AQBuBFKlhr8e4pN0-r2e_sUVqrQkTB6jVs9qOsbLJhk4r-e1tbRcTTDMzDMPMeg1EbWwvAKcovEKLskjCBMGcHYIypYBBRjEa_-iMw7fvXPM-RJLQgcgzm99Gsg0rZY_KNCnC-ViFb-Pcu-nbIyrjyOnuK4c23q8zFlC1t08W0MS82eee1GnxsT8ChU6G3032dgOfF9XJ2C8uHm7vZVQkVKcQALaFY1oYaiZgU3HBtNXZGSFZIjhGzlNiaccuV1KTWDjlLZS2oELjmxCAyAXC3V6fY98m6Svvh64IhKR8qlFfbFKp9Cht__sd32y_Txz_ybCeVbn7Q9_ATAD5lFA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1145_3729320
crossref_primary_10_1145_3656457
crossref_primary_10_1145_3704888
crossref_primary_10_1145_3632899
crossref_primary_10_1145_3704914
crossref_primary_10_1145_3704904
crossref_primary_10_1145_3720493
Cites_doi 10.1145/1133255.1134029
10.1017/S1471068411000627
10.2307/2275338
10.1145/1328897.1328459
10.1145/3209108.3209204
10.1145/2499370.2491969
10.1145/3373718.3394766
10.1007/s100090100049
10.1016/0743-1066(94)90033-7
10.1145/1925844.1926431
10.1145/2813885.2737993
10.1145/2629488
10.1007/s10817-019-09532-0
10.1007/s10703-016-0249-4
10.1007/s10817-016-9388-y
10.1145/2345156.2254112
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Owner/Author
Copyright_xml – notice: Owner/Author
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1145/3571265
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Computer Science
EISSN 2475-1421
EndPage 2140
ExternalDocumentID 10_1145_3571265
3571265
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NSF (National Science Foundation)
  grantid: CCF-1618059
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
– fundername: Office of Naval Research
  grantid: N00014-17-1-2787, N00014-22-1-2643
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000006
– fundername: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  grantid: JP20H04162, JP20K20625, JP22H03564, JP20H05703, JP22H03570
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001691
GroupedDBID AAKMM
AAYFX
ACM
ADPZR
AIKLT
AKRVB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
GUFHI
LHSKQ
M~E
OK1
ROL
AAYXX
AEFXT
AEJOY
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-e3429bd4d915976d6cec2fd795896215e43eb56e6a9c3bcf1fe49b74772b63d13
ISICitedReferencesCount 11
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000910847500072&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2475-1421
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 07:54:30 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:32:35 EST 2025
Mon Mar 17 16:30:35 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue POPL
Keywords fixpoint logics
constraint logic programming
temporal verification
Language English
License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a387t-e3429bd4d915976d6cec2fd795896215e43eb56e6a9c3bcf1fe49b74772b63d13
ORCID 0000-0001-5305-4916
0000-0001-7363-634X
0000-0002-4225-8195
0000-0003-0036-8967
OpenAccessLink https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571265
PageCount 30
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1145_3571265
crossref_primary_10_1145_3571265
acm_primary_3571265
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-01-09
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-09
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-01-09
  day: 09
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York, NY, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY, USA
PublicationTitle Proceedings of ACM on programming languages
PublicationTitleAbbrev ACM PACMPL
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher ACM
Publisher_xml – name: ACM
References Adrien Champion, Tomoya Chiba, Naoki Kobayashi, and Ryosuke Sato. 2018. ICE-Based Refinement Type Discovery for Higher-Order Functional Programs. In TACAS ’18 (LNCS, Vol. 10805). Springer, 365–384.
Laurent Fribourg. 1999. Constraint Logic Programming Applied to Model Checking. In LOPSTR ’99. Springer, 30–41.
Byron Cook, Eric Koskinen, and Moshe Vardi. 2011. Temporal Property Verification As a Program Analysis Task. In CAV ’11. Springer, 333–348.
Yuki Satake, Hiroshi Unno, and Hinata Yanagi. 2020. Probabilistic Inference for Predicate Constraint Satisfaction. AAAI ’20, 34, 02 (2020), Apr., 1644–1651.
Nikolaj Bjørner, Arie Gurfinkel, Kenneth L. McMillan, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2015. Horn Clause Solvers for Program Verification. In Fields of Logic and Computation II: Essays Dedicated to Yuri Gurevich on the Occasion of His 75th Birthday (LNCS, Vol. 9300). Springer, 24–51.
Oded Padon, James R. Wilcox, Jason R. Koenig, Kenneth L. McMillan, and Alex Aiken. 2022. Induction duality: primal-dual search for invariants. 6, POPL (2022), 1–29.
Yoji Nanjo, Hiroshi Unno, Eric Koskinen, and Tachio Terauchi. 2018. A Fixpoint Logic and Dependent Effects for Temporal Property Verification. In LICS ’18. ACM, 759–768.
Hiroshi Unno, Sho Torii, and Hiroki Sakamoto. 2017. Automating Induction for Solving Horn Clauses. In CAV ’17. Springer, 571–591.
Takuya Kuwahara, Tachio Terauchi, Hiroshi Unno, and Naoki Kobayashi. 2014. Automatic Termination Verification for Higher-Order Functional Programs. In ESOP ’14 (LNCS, Vol. 8410). Springer, 392–411.
Ton Chanh Le, Shengchao Qin, and Wei-Ngan Chin. 2015. Termination and Non-termination Specification Inference. In PLDI ’15. ACM, 489–498.
Witold Charatonik, David A. McAllester, Damian Niwinski, Andreas Podelski, and Igor Walukiewicz. 1998. The Horn Mu-calculus. In LICS ’98. IEEE Computer Society, 58–69.
Ranjit Jhala and Kenneth L. McMillan. 2006. A Practical and Complete Approach to Predicate Refinement. In TACAS ’06 (LNCS, Vol. 3920). Springer, 459–473.
Arie Gurfinkel, Temesghen Kahsai, Anvesh Komuravelli, and Jorge A. Navas. 2015. The SeaHorn Verification Framework. In CAV ’15. Springer, 343–361.
Stephan Falke, Deepak Kapur, and Carsten Sinz. 2011. Termination Analysis of C Programs Using Compiler Intermediate Languages. In RTA ’11. 10, Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 41–50.
Julian C. Bradfield. 1999. Fixpoint Alternation and the Game Quantifier. In CSL ’99 (LNCS, Vol. 1683). Springer, 350–361.
Daniel Dietsch, Matthias Heizmann, Vincent Langenfeld, and Andreas Podelski. 2015. Fairness Modulo Theory: A New Approach to LTL Software Model Checking. In CAV ’15. Springer, 49–66.
Caterina Urban, Samuel Ueltschi, and Peter Müller. 2018. Abstract Interpretation of CTL Properties. In SAS ’18 (LNCS, Vol. 11002). Springer, 402–422.
Edmund M. Clarke, Orna Grumberg, Somesh Jha, Yuan Lu, and Helmut Veith. 2000. Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement. In CAV ’00 (LNCS, Vol. 1855). Springer, 154–169.
Giorgio Delzanno and Andreas Podelski. 2001. Constraint-based Deductive Model Checking. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 3, 3 (2001), 250–270.
Anvesh Komuravelli, Arie Gurfinkel, and Sagar Chaki. 2016. SMT-Based Model Checking for Recursive Programs. Formal Methods in System Design, 48, 3 (2016), June, 175–205. issn:0925-9856
Hong Yi Chen, Byron Cook, Carsten Fuhs, Kaustubh Nimkar, and Peter W. O’Hearn. 2014. Proving Nontermination via Safety. In TACAS ’14 (LNCS, Vol. 8413). Springer, 156–171.
Sergey Grebenshchikov, Nuno P. Lopes, Corneliu Popeea, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2012. Synthesizing Software Verifiers from Proof Rules. In PLDI ’12. ACM, 405–416.
Temesghen Kahsai, Philipp Rümmer, Huascar Sanchez, and Martin Schäf. 2016. JayHorn: A Framework for Verifying Java programs. In CAV ’16. 9779, Springer, 352–358.
Naoki Kobayashi, Takeshi Tsukada, and Keiichi Watanabe. 2018. Higher-Order Program Verification via HFL Model Checking. In ESOP ’18. Springer, 711–738.
Ulf Nilsson and Johan Lübcke. 2000. Constraint Logic Programming for Local and Symbolic Model-Checking. In CL ’00. Springer, 384–398.
Byron Cook and Eric Koskinen. 2013. Reasoning About Nondeterminism in Programs. In PLDI ’13. ACM, 219–230.
Takeshi Tsukada. 2020. On Computability of Logical Approaches to Branching-Time Property Verification of Programs. In LICS ’20. ACM, 886–899.
Byron Cook, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2017. Verifying Increasingly Expressive Temporal Logics for Infinite-State Systems. J. ACM, 64, 2 (2017), Article 15, April, 39 pages.
Hiroshi Unno and Naoki Kobayashi. 2009. Dependent Type Inference with Interpolants. In PPDP ’09. ACM, 277–288.
Caterina Urban. 2013. The Abstract Domain of Segmented Ranking Functions. In SAS ’13 (LNCS, Vol. 7935). Springer, 43–62.
Byron Cook, Andreas Podelski, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2006. Termination proofs for systems code. In PLDI ’06. ACM, 415–426.
Robert S. Lubarsky. 1993. μ -Definable Sets of Integers. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58, 1 (1993), 291–313.
Grigory Fedyukovich, Yueling Zhang, and Aarti Gupta. 2018. Syntax-Guided Termination Analysis. In CAV ’18 (LNCS, Vol. 10981). Springer, 124–143.
Patrice Godefroid, Aditya V. Nori, Sriram K. Rajamani, and SaiDeep Tetali. 2010. Compositional may-must program analysis: unleashing the power of alternation. In POPL ’10, Manuel V. Hermenegildo and Jens Palsberg (Eds.). ACM, 43–56.
Gadi Tellez and James Brotherston. 2020. Automatically Verifying Temporal Properties of Pointer Programs with Cyclic Proof. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 64, 3 (2020), 555–578.
Ashutosh Gupta, Thomas A. Henzinger, Rupak Majumdar, Andrey Rybalchenko, and Ru-Gang Xu. 2008. Proving non-termination. In POPL ’08. ACM, 147–158.
Hiroshi Unno, Yuki Satake, Tachio Terauchi, and Eric Koskinen. 2020. Program Verification via Predicate Constraint Satisfiability Modulo Theories. CoRR, abs/2007.03656 (2020), arXiv:2007.03656. arxiv:2007.03656
Byron Cook, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2015. Fairness for Infinite-State Systems. In TACAS ’15. Springer, 384–398.
Naoki Kobayashi, Takeshi Nishikawa, Atsushi Igarashi, and Hiroshi Unno. 2019. Temporal Verification of Programs via First-Order Fixpoint Logic. In SAS ’19. Springer, 413–436.
Hiroshi Unno, Tachio Terauchi, and Eric Koskinen. 2021. Constraint-Based Relational Verification. In CAV ’21. Springer, 742–766.
Hossein Hojjat and Philipp Rümmer. 2018. The Eldarica Horn Solver. In FMCAD ’18. IEEE, 1–7.
Anvesh Komuravelli, Arie Gurfinkel, and Sagar Chaki. 2014. SMT-Based Model Checking for Recursive Programs. In CAV ’14 (LNCS, Vol. 8559). Springer, 17–34.
Tomáš Babiak, Mojmír Křetínský, Vojtěch Řehák, and Jan Strejček. 2012. LTL to Büchi Automata Translation: Fast and More Deterministic. In TACAS ’12. Springer, 95–109.
Thomas Ball and Sriram K. Rajamani. 2002. The SLAM project: debugging system software via static analysis. In POPL ’02. ACM, 1–3.
Tewodros A. Beyene, Corneliu Popeea, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2013. Solving Existentially Quantified Horn Clauses. In CAV ’13 (LNCS, Vol. 8044). Springer, 869–882.
Thomas A. Henzinger, Ranjit Jhala, Rupak Majumdar, and Kenneth L. McMillan. 2004. Abstractions from proofs. In POPL ’04. ACM, 232–244.
Kenneth L. McMillan. 2014. Lazy Annotation Revisited. In CAV ’14, Armin Biere and Roderick Bloem (Eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8559). Springer, 243–259.
Aaron R. Bradley. 2011. SAT-based Model Checking Without Unrolling. In VMCAI ’11 (LNCS, Vol. 6538). Springer, 70–87.
Fabio Fioravanti, Alberto Pettorossi, Maurizio Proietti, and Valerio Senni. 2013. Generalization strategies for the verification of infinite state systems. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 13, 2 (2013), 175–199.
Amir M. Ben-Amram and Samir Genaim. 2014. Ranking Functions for Linear-Constraint Loops. J. ACM, 61, 4 (2014), Article 26, July, 55 pages.
Caterina Urban and Antoine Miné. 2014. An Abstract Domain to Infer Ordinal-Valued Ranking Functions. In ESOP ’14. Springer, 412–431.
Matthias Heizmann, Jochen Hoenicke, and Andreas Podelski. 2014. Termination Analysis by Learning Terminating Programs. In CAV ’14. Springer, 797–813.
Hiroshi Unno, Yuki Satake, and Tachio Terauchi. 2017. Relatively Complete Refinement Type System for Verification of Higher-order Non-deterministic Programs. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2, POPL (2017), Article 12, Dec., 29 pages.
Byron Cook, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2015. On Automation of CTL* Verification for Infinite-State Systems. In CAV ’15. Springer, 13–29.
Marc Brockschmidt, Byron Cook, Samin Ishtiaq, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2016. T2: Temporal Property Verification. In TACAS ’16. Springer, 387–393. isbn:978-3-662-49674-9
Juergen Giesl, Cornelius Aschermann, Marc Brockschmidt, Fabian Emmes, Florian Frohn, Carsten Fuhs, Jera Hensel, Carsten Otto, Martin Pluecker, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Thomas Stroeder, Stephanie Swiderski, and Rene Thiemann. 2017. Analyzing Program Termination and Complexity Automatically with AProVE. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 58 (2017), 3–31.
Byron Cook, Carsten Fuhs, Kaustubh Nimkar, and Peter W. O’Hearn. 2014. Disproving termination with overapproximation. In FMCAD ’14. IEEE, 67–74.
Byron Cook and Eric Koskinen. 2011. Making Prophecies with Decision Predicates. In POPL ’11. ACM, 399–410.
Caterina Urban, Arie Gurfinkel, and Temesghen Kahsai. 2016. Synthesizing Ranking Functions from Bits and Pieces. In TACAS ’16. Springer, 54–70.
Tachio Terauchi and Hiroshi Unno. 2015. Relaxed Stratification: A New Approach to Practical Complete Predicate Refinement. In ESOP ’15 (LNCS, Vol. 9032). Springer, 610–633.
Joxan Jaffar and Michael J. Maher. 1994. Constraint logic programming: a survey. The Journal of Logic Programming, 19 (1994), 503 – 581.
Cook Byron (e_1_2_1_13_1) 2014
Cook Byron (e_1_2_1_15_1)
Henzinger Thomas A. (e_1_2_1_33_1) 2004
Cook Byron (e_1_2_1_19_1)
Gurfinkel Arie (e_1_2_1_31_1) 2015
Godefroid Patrice (e_1_2_1_28_1)
Komuravelli Anvesh (e_1_2_1_40_1)
Unno Hiroshi (e_1_2_1_56_1)
Urban Caterina (e_1_2_1_58_1)
e_1_2_1_20_1
e_1_2_1_41_1
McMillan Kenneth L. (e_1_2_1_45_1) 2014; 259
e_1_2_1_43_1
Urban Caterina (e_1_2_1_60_1)
Ball Thomas (e_1_2_1_2_1) 2002
Kahsai Temesghen (e_1_2_1_37_1)
Terauchi Tachio (e_1_2_1_51_1) 2015
Kobayashi Naoki (e_1_2_1_39_1)
Chen Hong Yi (e_1_2_1_11_1) 2014
Cook Byron (e_1_2_1_14_1)
Champion Adrien (e_1_2_1_9_1)
Jhala Ranjit (e_1_2_1_36_1) 2006
Padon Oded (e_1_2_1_48_1) 2022
Fedyukovich Grigory (e_1_2_1_24_1)
Unno Hiroshi (e_1_2_1_57_1)
Cook Byron (e_1_2_1_16_1) 2017; 64
Bradley Aaron R. (e_1_2_1_7_1)
Kuwahara Takuya (e_1_2_1_42_1)
e_1_2_1_35_1
e_1_2_1_50_1
e_1_2_1_52_1
e_1_2_1_18_1
Bradfield Julian C. (e_1_2_1_6_1)
Brockschmidt Marc (e_1_2_1_8_1)
Hojjat Hossein (e_1_2_1_34_1)
Bjørner Nikolaj (e_1_2_1_5_1)
e_1_2_1_23_1
e_1_2_1_46_1
e_1_2_1_21_1
e_1_2_1_44_1
e_1_2_1_27_1
e_1_2_1_25_1
Satake Yuki (e_1_2_1_49_1) 2020
Babiak Tomáš (e_1_2_1_1_1)
e_1_2_1_29_1
Beyene Tewodros A. (e_1_2_1_4_1)
Unno Hiroshi (e_1_2_1_55_1) 2020
Heizmann Matthias (e_1_2_1_32_1)
e_1_2_1_30_1
Urban Caterina (e_1_2_1_59_1)
e_1_2_1_3_1
e_1_2_1_53_1
Urban Caterina (e_1_2_1_61_1)
Unno Hiroshi (e_1_2_1_54_1) 2017
e_1_2_1_17_1
Fribourg Laurent (e_1_2_1_26_1)
Charatonik Witold (e_1_2_1_10_1)
Kobayashi Naoki (e_1_2_1_38_1)
Nilsson Ulf (e_1_2_1_47_1)
Clarke Edmund M. (e_1_2_1_12_1)
Dietsch Daniel (e_1_2_1_22_1)
References_xml – reference: Hiroshi Unno, Sho Torii, and Hiroki Sakamoto. 2017. Automating Induction for Solving Horn Clauses. In CAV ’17. Springer, 571–591.
– reference: Patrice Godefroid, Aditya V. Nori, Sriram K. Rajamani, and SaiDeep Tetali. 2010. Compositional may-must program analysis: unleashing the power of alternation. In POPL ’10, Manuel V. Hermenegildo and Jens Palsberg (Eds.). ACM, 43–56.
– reference: Ashutosh Gupta, Thomas A. Henzinger, Rupak Majumdar, Andrey Rybalchenko, and Ru-Gang Xu. 2008. Proving non-termination. In POPL ’08. ACM, 147–158.
– reference: Hiroshi Unno, Yuki Satake, Tachio Terauchi, and Eric Koskinen. 2020. Program Verification via Predicate Constraint Satisfiability Modulo Theories. CoRR, abs/2007.03656 (2020), arXiv:2007.03656. arxiv:2007.03656
– reference: Takeshi Tsukada. 2020. On Computability of Logical Approaches to Branching-Time Property Verification of Programs. In LICS ’20. ACM, 886–899.
– reference: Gadi Tellez and James Brotherston. 2020. Automatically Verifying Temporal Properties of Pointer Programs with Cyclic Proof. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 64, 3 (2020), 555–578.
– reference: Giorgio Delzanno and Andreas Podelski. 2001. Constraint-based Deductive Model Checking. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 3, 3 (2001), 250–270.
– reference: Ranjit Jhala and Kenneth L. McMillan. 2006. A Practical and Complete Approach to Predicate Refinement. In TACAS ’06 (LNCS, Vol. 3920). Springer, 459–473.
– reference: Byron Cook, Eric Koskinen, and Moshe Vardi. 2011. Temporal Property Verification As a Program Analysis Task. In CAV ’11. Springer, 333–348.
– reference: Tomáš Babiak, Mojmír Křetínský, Vojtěch Řehák, and Jan Strejček. 2012. LTL to Büchi Automata Translation: Fast and More Deterministic. In TACAS ’12. Springer, 95–109.
– reference: Caterina Urban, Arie Gurfinkel, and Temesghen Kahsai. 2016. Synthesizing Ranking Functions from Bits and Pieces. In TACAS ’16. Springer, 54–70.
– reference: Stephan Falke, Deepak Kapur, and Carsten Sinz. 2011. Termination Analysis of C Programs Using Compiler Intermediate Languages. In RTA ’11. 10, Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 41–50.
– reference: Tewodros A. Beyene, Corneliu Popeea, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2013. Solving Existentially Quantified Horn Clauses. In CAV ’13 (LNCS, Vol. 8044). Springer, 869–882.
– reference: Sergey Grebenshchikov, Nuno P. Lopes, Corneliu Popeea, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2012. Synthesizing Software Verifiers from Proof Rules. In PLDI ’12. ACM, 405–416.
– reference: Hiroshi Unno and Naoki Kobayashi. 2009. Dependent Type Inference with Interpolants. In PPDP ’09. ACM, 277–288.
– reference: Ton Chanh Le, Shengchao Qin, and Wei-Ngan Chin. 2015. Termination and Non-termination Specification Inference. In PLDI ’15. ACM, 489–498.
– reference: Tachio Terauchi and Hiroshi Unno. 2015. Relaxed Stratification: A New Approach to Practical Complete Predicate Refinement. In ESOP ’15 (LNCS, Vol. 9032). Springer, 610–633.
– reference: Daniel Dietsch, Matthias Heizmann, Vincent Langenfeld, and Andreas Podelski. 2015. Fairness Modulo Theory: A New Approach to LTL Software Model Checking. In CAV ’15. Springer, 49–66.
– reference: Fabio Fioravanti, Alberto Pettorossi, Maurizio Proietti, and Valerio Senni. 2013. Generalization strategies for the verification of infinite state systems. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 13, 2 (2013), 175–199.
– reference: Byron Cook, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2017. Verifying Increasingly Expressive Temporal Logics for Infinite-State Systems. J. ACM, 64, 2 (2017), Article 15, April, 39 pages.
– reference: Byron Cook and Eric Koskinen. 2013. Reasoning About Nondeterminism in Programs. In PLDI ’13. ACM, 219–230.
– reference: Hiroshi Unno, Yuki Satake, and Tachio Terauchi. 2017. Relatively Complete Refinement Type System for Verification of Higher-order Non-deterministic Programs. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2, POPL (2017), Article 12, Dec., 29 pages.
– reference: Temesghen Kahsai, Philipp Rümmer, Huascar Sanchez, and Martin Schäf. 2016. JayHorn: A Framework for Verifying Java programs. In CAV ’16. 9779, Springer, 352–358.
– reference: Naoki Kobayashi, Takeshi Nishikawa, Atsushi Igarashi, and Hiroshi Unno. 2019. Temporal Verification of Programs via First-Order Fixpoint Logic. In SAS ’19. Springer, 413–436.
– reference: Amir M. Ben-Amram and Samir Genaim. 2014. Ranking Functions for Linear-Constraint Loops. J. ACM, 61, 4 (2014), Article 26, July, 55 pages.
– reference: Robert S. Lubarsky. 1993. μ -Definable Sets of Integers. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58, 1 (1993), 291–313.
– reference: Marc Brockschmidt, Byron Cook, Samin Ishtiaq, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2016. T2: Temporal Property Verification. In TACAS ’16. Springer, 387–393. isbn:978-3-662-49674-9
– reference: Edmund M. Clarke, Orna Grumberg, Somesh Jha, Yuan Lu, and Helmut Veith. 2000. Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement. In CAV ’00 (LNCS, Vol. 1855). Springer, 154–169.
– reference: Joxan Jaffar and Michael J. Maher. 1994. Constraint logic programming: a survey. The Journal of Logic Programming, 19 (1994), 503 – 581.
– reference: Byron Cook, Carsten Fuhs, Kaustubh Nimkar, and Peter W. O’Hearn. 2014. Disproving termination with overapproximation. In FMCAD ’14. IEEE, 67–74.
– reference: Hiroshi Unno, Tachio Terauchi, and Eric Koskinen. 2021. Constraint-Based Relational Verification. In CAV ’21. Springer, 742–766.
– reference: Oded Padon, James R. Wilcox, Jason R. Koenig, Kenneth L. McMillan, and Alex Aiken. 2022. Induction duality: primal-dual search for invariants. 6, POPL (2022), 1–29.
– reference: Thomas A. Henzinger, Ranjit Jhala, Rupak Majumdar, and Kenneth L. McMillan. 2004. Abstractions from proofs. In POPL ’04. ACM, 232–244.
– reference: Anvesh Komuravelli, Arie Gurfinkel, and Sagar Chaki. 2014. SMT-Based Model Checking for Recursive Programs. In CAV ’14 (LNCS, Vol. 8559). Springer, 17–34.
– reference: Caterina Urban. 2013. The Abstract Domain of Segmented Ranking Functions. In SAS ’13 (LNCS, Vol. 7935). Springer, 43–62.
– reference: Caterina Urban, Samuel Ueltschi, and Peter Müller. 2018. Abstract Interpretation of CTL Properties. In SAS ’18 (LNCS, Vol. 11002). Springer, 402–422.
– reference: Arie Gurfinkel, Temesghen Kahsai, Anvesh Komuravelli, and Jorge A. Navas. 2015. The SeaHorn Verification Framework. In CAV ’15. Springer, 343–361.
– reference: Laurent Fribourg. 1999. Constraint Logic Programming Applied to Model Checking. In LOPSTR ’99. Springer, 30–41.
– reference: Byron Cook, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2015. On Automation of CTL* Verification for Infinite-State Systems. In CAV ’15. Springer, 13–29.
– reference: Matthias Heizmann, Jochen Hoenicke, and Andreas Podelski. 2014. Termination Analysis by Learning Terminating Programs. In CAV ’14. Springer, 797–813.
– reference: Yoji Nanjo, Hiroshi Unno, Eric Koskinen, and Tachio Terauchi. 2018. A Fixpoint Logic and Dependent Effects for Temporal Property Verification. In LICS ’18. ACM, 759–768.
– reference: Aaron R. Bradley. 2011. SAT-based Model Checking Without Unrolling. In VMCAI ’11 (LNCS, Vol. 6538). Springer, 70–87.
– reference: Naoki Kobayashi, Takeshi Tsukada, and Keiichi Watanabe. 2018. Higher-Order Program Verification via HFL Model Checking. In ESOP ’18. Springer, 711–738.
– reference: Anvesh Komuravelli, Arie Gurfinkel, and Sagar Chaki. 2016. SMT-Based Model Checking for Recursive Programs. Formal Methods in System Design, 48, 3 (2016), June, 175–205. issn:0925-9856
– reference: Grigory Fedyukovich, Yueling Zhang, and Aarti Gupta. 2018. Syntax-Guided Termination Analysis. In CAV ’18 (LNCS, Vol. 10981). Springer, 124–143.
– reference: Hong Yi Chen, Byron Cook, Carsten Fuhs, Kaustubh Nimkar, and Peter W. O’Hearn. 2014. Proving Nontermination via Safety. In TACAS ’14 (LNCS, Vol. 8413). Springer, 156–171.
– reference: Caterina Urban and Antoine Miné. 2014. An Abstract Domain to Infer Ordinal-Valued Ranking Functions. In ESOP ’14. Springer, 412–431.
– reference: Hossein Hojjat and Philipp Rümmer. 2018. The Eldarica Horn Solver. In FMCAD ’18. IEEE, 1–7.
– reference: Witold Charatonik, David A. McAllester, Damian Niwinski, Andreas Podelski, and Igor Walukiewicz. 1998. The Horn Mu-calculus. In LICS ’98. IEEE Computer Society, 58–69.
– reference: Yuki Satake, Hiroshi Unno, and Hinata Yanagi. 2020. Probabilistic Inference for Predicate Constraint Satisfaction. AAAI ’20, 34, 02 (2020), Apr., 1644–1651.
– reference: Kenneth L. McMillan. 2014. Lazy Annotation Revisited. In CAV ’14, Armin Biere and Roderick Bloem (Eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8559). Springer, 243–259.
– reference: Nikolaj Bjørner, Arie Gurfinkel, Kenneth L. McMillan, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2015. Horn Clause Solvers for Program Verification. In Fields of Logic and Computation II: Essays Dedicated to Yuri Gurevich on the Occasion of His 75th Birthday (LNCS, Vol. 9300). Springer, 24–51.
– reference: Byron Cook and Eric Koskinen. 2011. Making Prophecies with Decision Predicates. In POPL ’11. ACM, 399–410.
– reference: Byron Cook, Andreas Podelski, and Andrey Rybalchenko. 2006. Termination proofs for systems code. In PLDI ’06. ACM, 415–426.
– reference: Ulf Nilsson and Johan Lübcke. 2000. Constraint Logic Programming for Local and Symbolic Model-Checking. In CL ’00. Springer, 384–398.
– reference: Takuya Kuwahara, Tachio Terauchi, Hiroshi Unno, and Naoki Kobayashi. 2014. Automatic Termination Verification for Higher-Order Functional Programs. In ESOP ’14 (LNCS, Vol. 8410). Springer, 392–411.
– reference: Thomas Ball and Sriram K. Rajamani. 2002. The SLAM project: debugging system software via static analysis. In POPL ’02. ACM, 1–3.
– reference: Byron Cook, Heidy Khlaaf, and Nir Piterman. 2015. Fairness for Infinite-State Systems. In TACAS ’15. Springer, 384–398.
– reference: Juergen Giesl, Cornelius Aschermann, Marc Brockschmidt, Fabian Emmes, Florian Frohn, Carsten Fuhs, Jera Hensel, Carsten Otto, Martin Pluecker, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Thomas Stroeder, Stephanie Swiderski, and Rene Thiemann. 2017. Analyzing Program Termination and Complexity Automatically with AProVE. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 58 (2017), 3–31.
– reference: Adrien Champion, Tomoya Chiba, Naoki Kobayashi, and Ryosuke Sato. 2018. ICE-Based Refinement Type Discovery for Higher-Order Functional Programs. In TACAS ’18 (LNCS, Vol. 10805). Springer, 365–384.
– reference: Julian C. Bradfield. 1999. Fixpoint Alternation and the Game Quantifier. In CSL ’99 (LNCS, Vol. 1683). Springer, 350–361.
– volume-title: O’Hearn
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_1_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_20_1
  doi: 10.1145/1133255.1134029
– volume-title: Program Verification via Predicate Constraint Satisfiability Modulo Theories. CoRR, abs/2007.03656
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_1_55_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_25_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1471068411000627
– volume-title: TACAS ’18 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_9_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_44_1
  doi: 10.2307/2275338
– volume-title: TACAS ’16
  ident: e_1_2_1_8_1
– volume: 259
  volume-title: Armin Biere and Roderick Bloem (Eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_1_45_1
– volume-title: CAV ’00 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_12_1
– volume-title: Fields of Logic and Computation II: Essays Dedicated to Yuri Gurevich on the Occasion of His 75th Birthday (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_5_1
– volume-title: CL ’00
  ident: e_1_2_1_47_1
– volume-title: LICS ’98
  ident: e_1_2_1_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_30_1
  doi: 10.1145/1328897.1328459
– volume-title: CAV ’14
  ident: e_1_2_1_32_1
– volume-title: SAS ’18 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_61_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_46_1
  doi: 10.1145/3209108.3209204
– volume-title: Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2, POPL
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_1_54_1
– volume-title: Rajamani
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_1_2_1
– volume-title: McMillan
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_1_33_1
– volume-title: CAV ’11
  ident: e_1_2_1_19_1
– volume-title: McMillan
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_1_36_1
– volume-title: POPL
  year: 2022
  ident: e_1_2_1_48_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_53_1
– volume-title: CAV ’17
  ident: e_1_2_1_57_1
– volume: 64
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_1_16_1
  article-title: Verifying Increasingly Expressive Temporal Logics for Infinite-State Systems
  publication-title: J. ACM
– volume-title: ESOP ’14
  ident: e_1_2_1_60_1
– volume-title: CAV ’13 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_4_1
– volume-title: ESOP ’14 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_42_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_18_1
  doi: 10.1145/2499370.2491969
– volume-title: Relaxed Stratification: A New Approach to Practical Complete Predicate Refinement. In ESOP ’15 (LNCS
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_1_51_1
– volume-title: TACAS ’12
  ident: e_1_2_1_1_1
– volume-title: ESOP ’18
  ident: e_1_2_1_39_1
– volume-title: SAS ’13 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_58_1
– volume-title: FMCAD ’18
  ident: e_1_2_1_34_1
– volume-title: CSL ’99 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_6_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_52_1
  doi: 10.1145/3373718.3394766
– ident: e_1_2_1_21_1
  doi: 10.1007/s100090100049
– volume-title: VMCAI ’11 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_7_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_23_1
– volume-title: CAV ’18 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_24_1
– volume-title: CAV ’21
  ident: e_1_2_1_56_1
– volume-title: TACAS ’15
  ident: e_1_2_1_14_1
– volume-title: Navas
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_1_31_1
– volume-title: Probabilistic Inference for Predicate Constraint Satisfaction. AAAI ’20, 34, 02
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_1_49_1
– volume-title: LOPSTR ’99
  ident: e_1_2_1_26_1
– volume-title: TACAS ’16
  ident: e_1_2_1_59_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_35_1
  doi: 10.1016/0743-1066(94)90033-7
– ident: e_1_2_1_17_1
  doi: 10.1145/1925844.1926431
– ident: e_1_2_1_43_1
  doi: 10.1145/2813885.2737993
– ident: e_1_2_1_3_1
  doi: 10.1145/2629488
– ident: e_1_2_1_50_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10817-019-09532-0
– volume-title: CAV ’15
  ident: e_1_2_1_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_41_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10703-016-0249-4
– volume-title: CAV ’15
  ident: e_1_2_1_15_1
– ident: e_1_2_1_27_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10817-016-9388-y
– ident: e_1_2_1_29_1
  doi: 10.1145/2345156.2254112
– volume-title: CAV ’16. 9779
  ident: e_1_2_1_37_1
– volume-title: SAS ’19
  ident: e_1_2_1_38_1
– volume-title: O’Hearn
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_1_11_1
– volume-title: POPL ’10, Manuel V
  ident: e_1_2_1_28_1
– volume-title: CAV ’14 (LNCS
  ident: e_1_2_1_40_1
SSID ssj0001934839
Score 2.3310173
Snippet We present a novel approach to deciding the validity of formulas in first-order fixpoint logic with background theories and arbitrarily nested inductive and...
SourceID crossref
acm
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2111
SubjectTerms Automated reasoning
Constraint and logic programming
Logic and verification
Program verification
Theory of computation
SubjectTermsDisplay Theory of computation -- Automated reasoning
Theory of computation -- Constraint and logic programming
Theory of computation -- Logic and verification
Theory of computation -- Program verification
Title Modular Primal-Dual Fixpoint Logic Solving for Temporal Verification
URI https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571265
Volume 7
WOSCitedRecordID wos000910847500072&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2475-1421
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001934839
  issn: 2475-1421
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20170101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLfK4MCFjwGifMkHxKUKKLFjx8dpY9phHZHopt2q2LFFtCyptrbqifP-7D07dpYVJODAJWot2438fnrv59f3gdBHYATGgKGOGC3ggsJjGQmqZcQllUCwY81duaazY35ykp2fi3w0ugm5MOuaN0222YjFfxU1jIGwbersP4i73xQG4DMIHZ4gdnj-leCnbelCS3NbR6KODmx-yGG1WbRVs7Qdeis1-d7W6xBBOetqU9WTM3g54z14Q8qa9ybORX3s7U_tHww-ruvSbhN8nj09P21cQ-_JUQU2-EfVewdskU_lughPZjaIs-2jf1bOFKx69d9eXwD9bYKmHvomEuJ8E-JOhSWUp1FMuxzoz_o3Y14H8wHU8m_58T2V6rWx9l-78k6_qn5qq2SQlMdJ133ifnHtLaPXhyJ2idnp3C98gB4mPBVWP05_Drx1gtDMtaXrX7_LwLZrv_i1luCoywHBGTCV2TP0xF8x8F4HjedopJtd9DS078Bem79ABx4peIAUHJCCHVKwRwoGpOCAFDxEykt0evh1tn8U-aYaUUEyvow0AQYiS1oKILKclUxplZiSizQTDPifpkTLlGlWCEWkMrHRVEi4dPJEMlLG5BXaadpGv0ZYEcrKIikSQmJLrAtFjKBpYQTQIcPUGO3CecwXXdmUcMJj9Cmcz1z5OvS2HUo93xLFGH4hTAx7bE158-cpb9HjO2S-QzvLq5V-jx6p9bK6vvrgpHwL4wlzjQ
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modular+Primal-Dual+Fixpoint+Logic+Solving+for+Temporal+Verification&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+ACM+on+programming+languages&rft.au=Unno%2C+Hiroshi&rft.au=Terauchi%2C+Tachio&rft.au=Gu%2C+Yu&rft.au=Koskinen%2C+Eric&rft.date=2023-01-09&rft.issn=2475-1421&rft.eissn=2475-1421&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=POPL&rft.spage=2111&rft.epage=2140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145%2F3571265&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1145_3571265
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2475-1421&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2475-1421&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2475-1421&client=summon