Understated gender disparities due to outcome-dependent selection: Commentary on Mackelprang et al. (2023)

What is the gender gap in invited publications in high-impact psychology journals? To answer this critical question, Mackelprang et al. (2023) examined invited publications in five high-impact psychology journals. They first calculated the share of women among authors of the invited publications (35...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American psychologist Vol. 78; no. 6; p. 811
Main Authors: Loh, Wen Wei, Ren, Dongning
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01.09.2023
Subjects:
Female
Gender Equity
Humans
Research Personnel
ISSN:1935-990X, 1935-990X
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract What is the gender gap in invited publications in high-impact psychology journals? To answer this critical question, Mackelprang et al. (2023) examined invited publications in five high-impact psychology journals. They first calculated the share of women among authors of the invited publications (35.6%), then compared it with a "base rate" (42.3%; the share of women among associate and full psychology professors at R1 institutions). This comparison was presented as empirical evidence of women being underrepresented in the authorship of publications in these high-impact journals. In this commentary, we show that comparing these two descriptives-either using a difference or a ratio-provides little insight into the actual gender disparity of interest. A fundamental shortcoming of such a comparison is due to outcome-dependent selection. We explain what outcome-dependent selection is and why it is inappropriate. Crucially, we explain why, following such outcome-dependent selection, comparing the share of women in the selected sample with a "base rate" rules out drawing valid inferences about the actual gender gap. We urge researchers to recognize the perils of, and thus avoid, outcome-dependent selection. Finally, we suggest an alternative approach that permits a more accurate understanding of gender disparities in academia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
AbstractList What is the gender gap in invited publications in high-impact psychology journals? To answer this critical question, Mackelprang et al. (2023) examined invited publications in five high-impact psychology journals. They first calculated the share of women among authors of the invited publications (35.6%), then compared it with a "base rate" (42.3%; the share of women among associate and full psychology professors at R1 institutions). This comparison was presented as empirical evidence of women being underrepresented in the authorship of publications in these high-impact journals. In this commentary, we show that comparing these two descriptives-either using a difference or a ratio-provides little insight into the actual gender disparity of interest. A fundamental shortcoming of such a comparison is due to outcome-dependent selection. We explain what outcome-dependent selection is and why it is inappropriate. Crucially, we explain why, following such outcome-dependent selection, comparing the share of women in the selected sample with a "base rate" rules out drawing valid inferences about the actual gender gap. We urge researchers to recognize the perils of, and thus avoid, outcome-dependent selection. Finally, we suggest an alternative approach that permits a more accurate understanding of gender disparities in academia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
What is the gender gap in invited publications in high-impact psychology journals? To answer this critical question, Mackelprang et al. (2023) examined invited publications in five high-impact psychology journals. They first calculated the share of women among authors of the invited publications (35.6%), then compared it with a "base rate" (42.3%; the share of women among associate and full psychology professors at R1 institutions). This comparison was presented as empirical evidence of women being underrepresented in the authorship of publications in these high-impact journals. In this commentary, we show that comparing these two descriptives-either using a difference or a ratio-provides little insight into the actual gender disparity of interest. A fundamental shortcoming of such a comparison is due to outcome-dependent selection. We explain what outcome-dependent selection is and why it is inappropriate. Crucially, we explain why, following such outcome-dependent selection, comparing the share of women in the selected sample with a "base rate" rules out drawing valid inferences about the actual gender gap. We urge researchers to recognize the perils of, and thus avoid, outcome-dependent selection. Finally, we suggest an alternative approach that permits a more accurate understanding of gender disparities in academia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).What is the gender gap in invited publications in high-impact psychology journals? To answer this critical question, Mackelprang et al. (2023) examined invited publications in five high-impact psychology journals. They first calculated the share of women among authors of the invited publications (35.6%), then compared it with a "base rate" (42.3%; the share of women among associate and full psychology professors at R1 institutions). This comparison was presented as empirical evidence of women being underrepresented in the authorship of publications in these high-impact journals. In this commentary, we show that comparing these two descriptives-either using a difference or a ratio-provides little insight into the actual gender disparity of interest. A fundamental shortcoming of such a comparison is due to outcome-dependent selection. We explain what outcome-dependent selection is and why it is inappropriate. Crucially, we explain why, following such outcome-dependent selection, comparing the share of women in the selected sample with a "base rate" rules out drawing valid inferences about the actual gender gap. We urge researchers to recognize the perils of, and thus avoid, outcome-dependent selection. Finally, we suggest an alternative approach that permits a more accurate understanding of gender disparities in academia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Author Loh, Wen Wei
Ren, Dongning
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Wen Wei
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7086-7281
  surname: Loh
  fullname: Loh, Wen Wei
  organization: Department of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dongning
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7749-2419
  surname: Ren
  fullname: Ren, Dongning
  organization: Department of Psychology, Emory University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37676156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkEtPwzAQhC1URB9w4QcgH-GQYjuxE3NDFS-piAuVuEUbe1ulJHaInQP_nlQUidPMjj6NtDMnE-cdEnLJ2ZKzNL-FtmOMca7yEzLjOpWJ1uxj8s9PyTyE_QjJQvMzMk1zlSsu1YzsN85iHyJEtHSHh4PaOnTQ17HGQO2ANHrqh2h8i4nF7sC4SAM2aGLt3R1d-bYdI-i_qXf0FcwnNl0PbkcxUmiW9Fowkd6ck9MtNAEvjrogm8eH99Vzsn57elndrxNIcx0TkQJUequyLdOFwCwTlZJbkAjWaNBWKaxMZqXmRaEzriUWBRiwOjMiTRHFglz_9na9_xowxLKtg8GmAYd-CKUolOA6LyQb0asjOlQt2rLr63Z8o_zbR_wAO5NpVg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_25152459241260256
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1037/amp0001167
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 1935-990X
ExternalDocumentID 37676156
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
-ET
-~X
.GJ
07C
0R~
186
23M
2KS
354
3EH
3KI
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6TJ
7RZ
85S
9M8
AAAHA
AAIKC
AAMNW
AAWTL
ABCQX
ABIVO
ABNCP
ABPPZ
ABUFD
ABVOZ
ACGFO
ACHQT
ACKIV
ACNCT
ACPQG
ACTDY
ADMHG
ADXHL
AEHFB
AETEA
AFFHD
AFFNX
AGNAY
AI.
ALEEW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASUFR
AWKKM
AZXWR
BKOMP
CGNQK
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
D~A
ECM
EIF
EPA
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
ISO
L7B
LPU
LW5
MS~
MVM
NHB
NPM
O9-
OHT
OMK
OPA
OVD
P2P
PHGZT
PQQKQ
ROL
RXW
SES
SKT
SPA
TAE
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
UBC
UCV
UHB
UHS
ULE
UPT
URZ
VH1
VQP
WH7
X6Y
XIH
XOL
XZL
YCV
YQI
YR5
YRY
YYP
YYQ
YZZ
ZCA
ZCG
ZGI
ZHY
ZPI
~02
~A~
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-23aab9f64f0982e442b65fa5eadc9a9d66ebc4d5918894195e88acad94c233ee2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 4
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001062999800009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1935-990X
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 12:54:03 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 01:48:25 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a379t-23aab9f64f0982e442b65fa5eadc9a9d66ebc4d5918894195e88acad94c233ee2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-7086-7281
0000-0001-7749-2419
PMID 37676156
PQID 2862197850
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2862197850
pubmed_primary_37676156
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The American psychologist
PublicationTitleAlternate Am Psychol
PublicationYear 2023
SSID ssj0005891
Score 2.4542062
Snippet What is the gender gap in invited publications in high-impact psychology journals? To answer this critical question, Mackelprang et al. (2023) examined invited...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 811
SubjectTerms Female
Gender Equity
Humans
Research Personnel
Title Understated gender disparities due to outcome-dependent selection: Commentary on Mackelprang et al. (2023)
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37676156
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2862197850
Volume 78
WOSCitedRecordID wos001062999800009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV27TsMwFLWAMnTh_SgvGYkBBqtp_IjNghCiYmnVgUrdKsd2qiJISpMi9e-5TlI6ISGxRFmiJL43xye-1-cgdCOTxCqaxESYDidM04hoLTmxjmpqWEA1t6XZRNTvy9FIDeoFt7xuq1xhYgnUNjN-jbwdAvXuwC8PDx5mn8S7Rvnqam2hsYkaFKiMz-potFYLrx3zgKNwAqg7WsmT0qitP2ZBVYT4nVqWU0x3978Pt4d2anKJH6ts2EcbLj1AzR-MWx6it2G9mQWIJp6UNnLYTnNvReiVVbFdOFxkOFsUcGNHVha5Bc5LvxwI4j32e0p8x_l8ibMU9zTgwPsMprwJdgUGKo9vvVn63REadp9fn15IbbdAIEKqICHVOlaJYEmgZOgYC2PBE80h14zSygrhYsMsVx0pFeso7qTURlvFTEipc-Ex2kqz1J0iLIQFJheEhseUKRnrSEcWIg-n0og4aqHr1TiOIZ19jUKnLlvk4_VIttBJFYzxrNLdGHvhGSBg4uwPV5-jpn_XqhvsAjUS-JjdJdo2X8U0n1-VeQLH_qD3DQLxyc0
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understated+gender+disparities+due+to+outcome-dependent+selection%3A+Commentary+on+Mackelprang+et+al.+%282023%29&rft.jtitle=The+American+psychologist&rft.au=Loh%2C+Wen+Wei&rft.au=Ren%2C+Dongning&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.issn=1935-990X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Famp0001167&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1935-990X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1935-990X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1935-990X&client=summon