Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners

Exposure to irrelevant contextual information prompts confirmation-biased judgments of forensic science evidence (Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka, 2013). Nevertheless, some forensic examiners appear to believe that blind testing is unnecessary. To assess forensic examiners' beliefs about the scope...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Journal of applied research in memory and cognition Ročník 6; číslo 4; s. 452 - 459
Hlavní autori: Kukucka, Jeff, Kassin, Saul M., Zapf, Patricia A., Dror, Itiel E.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Washigton Elsevier Science 01.12.2017
Elsevier Inc
Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Predmet:
ISSN:2211-3681, 2211-369X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Exposure to irrelevant contextual information prompts confirmation-biased judgments of forensic science evidence (Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka, 2013). Nevertheless, some forensic examiners appear to believe that blind testing is unnecessary. To assess forensic examiners' beliefs about the scope and nature of cognitive bias, we surveyed 403 experienced examiners from 21 countries. Overall, examiners regarded their judgments as nearly infallible and showed only a limited understanding and appreciation of cognitive bias. Most examiners believed they are immune to bias or can reduce bias through mere willpower, and fewer than half supported blind testing. Furthermore, many examiners showed a bias blind spot (Pronin, Lin, & Ross, 2002), acknowledging bias in other domains but not their own, and in other examiners but not themselves. These findings underscore the necessity of procedural reforms that blind forensic examiners to potentially biasing information, as is commonplace in other branches of science. General Audience Summary Forensic science errors have been found in many cases where innocent people were wrongly convicted of crimes. Research suggests that some of these errors may be due to confirmation bias-the tendency to interpret new information in ways that confirm one's pre-existing beliefs. Some forensic labs have taken steps to protect against confirmation bias, while others have resisted doing so. To better understand forensic scientists' beliefs about bias, we surveyed over 400 professional forensic scientists from 21 countries. Although most agreed that bias is a problem in forensic science, few believed that bias affects them personally. Many also opposed procedures that are commonly used to prevent bias in other branches of science, and instead felt that willpower alone can prevent bias. We hope that our results can be used to encourage science-based reforms that will maximize the value of forensic science evidence.
AbstractList Exposure to irrelevant contextual information prompts confirmation-biased judgments of forensic science evidence (Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka, 2013). Nevertheless, some forensic examiners appear to believe that blind testing is unnecessary. To assess forensic examiners’ beliefs about the scope and nature of cognitive bias, we surveyed 403 experienced examiners from 21 countries. Overall, examiners regarded their judgments as nearly infallible and showed only a limited understanding and appreciation of cognitive bias. Most examiners believed they are immune to bias or can reduce bias through mere willpower, and fewer than half supported blind testing. Furthermore, many examiners showed a bias blind spot (Pronin, Lin, & Ross, 2002), acknowledging bias in other domains but not their own, and in other examiners but not themselves. These findings underscore the necessity of procedural reforms that blind forensic examiners to potentially biasing information, as is commonplace in other branches of science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
Exposure to irrelevant contextual information prompts confirmation-biased judgments of forensic science evidence (Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka, 2013). Nevertheless, some forensic examiners appear to believe that blind testing is unnecessary. To assess forensic examiners' beliefs about the scope and nature of cognitive bias, we surveyed 403 experienced examiners from 21 countries. Overall, examiners regarded their judgments as nearly infallible and showed only a limited understanding and appreciation of cognitive bias. Most examiners believed they are immune to bias or can reduce bias through mere willpower, and fewer than half supported blind testing. Furthermore, many examiners showed a bias blind spot (Pronin, Lin, & Ross, 2002), acknowledging bias in other domains but not their own, and in other examiners but not themselves. These findings underscore the necessity of procedural reforms that blind forensic examiners to potentially biasing information, as is commonplace in other branches of science. General Audience Summary Forensic science errors have been found in many cases where innocent people were wrongly convicted of crimes. Research suggests that some of these errors may be due to confirmation bias-the tendency to interpret new information in ways that confirm one's pre-existing beliefs. Some forensic labs have taken steps to protect against confirmation bias, while others have resisted doing so. To better understand forensic scientists' beliefs about bias, we surveyed over 400 professional forensic scientists from 21 countries. Although most agreed that bias is a problem in forensic science, few believed that bias affects them personally. Many also opposed procedures that are commonly used to prevent bias in other branches of science, and instead felt that willpower alone can prevent bias. We hope that our results can be used to encourage science-based reforms that will maximize the value of forensic science evidence.
Exposure to irrelevant contextual information prompts confirmation-biased judgments of forensic science evidence (Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka, 2013). Nevertheless, some forensic examiners appear to believe that blind testing is unnecessary. To assess forensic examiners’ beliefs about the scope and nature of cognitive bias, we surveyed 403 experienced examiners from 21 countries. Overall, examiners regarded their judgments as nearly infallible and showed only a limited understanding and appreciation of cognitive bias. Most examiners believed they are immune to bias or can reduce bias through mere willpower, and fewer than half supported blind testing. Furthermore, many examiners showed a bias blind spot (Pronin, Lin, & Ross, 2002), acknowledging bias in other domains but not their own, and in other examiners but not themselves. These findings underscore the necessity of procedural reforms that blind forensic examiners to potentially biasing information, as is commonplace in other branches of science.
Author Kassin, Saul M.
Zapf, Patricia A.
Kukucka, Jeff
Dror, Itiel E.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jeff
  surname: Kukucka
  fullname: Kukucka, Jeff
  email: jkukucka@towson.edu
  organization: Towson University, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Saul M.
  surname: Kassin
  fullname: Kassin, Saul M.
  organization: John Jay College of Criminal Justice, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Patricia A.
  surname: Zapf
  fullname: Zapf, Patricia A.
  organization: John Jay College of Criminal Justice, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Itiel E.
  surname: Dror
  fullname: Dror, Itiel E.
  organization: University College London (UCL), United Kingdom
BookMark eNqFkE1LJDEQhsPiwrrqP9hDYG_C9FY-pnvag6DD6IrCHlTYW0inK5KmJ5lNMoPz783Qsgcv1iVFqOet5PlOjnzwSMgPBhUDVv8aqkHHtTYVB9ZU0FYA7As55pyxmajbv0f_-wX7Rs5SGqBUDazcHpP7ZXjxLrsd0munE9W-p9ej873HlC7oFb0dQ6dH-riNO9zTYOlNiOiTM_TROPQG6epVr53HmE7JV6vHhGfv5wl5vlk9LX_PHv7c3i2vHma6vCfPbGObhqPt-7m0IIGBFS0Hu0AhGuxANobbXmLXLUAAR2y5EdxKa-0cTKfFCfk55W5i-LfFlNUQttGXlYrXXLZ1zURbpi6mKRNDShGtMi7r7ILPUbtRMVAHf2pQkz918KegVcVfgeUHeBPdWsf9Z9jlhGH5_s5hVGmS1LuIJqs-uM8CzqcAvdFqk_ZGx-zMiMlsY9Ge1QGolVRyzsUb8tOcpg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1027_2151_2604_a000409
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_13817
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_3703
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scijus_2019_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1027_2698_1866_a000056
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12024_024_00919_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e36066
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jarmac_2018_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_24732850_2023_2249455
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diin_2019_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1108_HESWBL_08_2024_0235
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14220
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14542
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14861
crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2022_2114476
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14265
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14546
crossref_primary_10_1002_acp_3738
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scijus_2024_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_lcrp_12237
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijlcj_2020_100406
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110433
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsidi_2024_301795
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scijus_2019_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1038_s44159_025_00430_4
crossref_primary_10_38146_bsz_ajia_2025_v73_i1_pp159_179
crossref_primary_10_61347_psa_v3i1_78
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amp_2022_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jarmac_2018_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1080_13218719_2020_1742243
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jarmac_2018_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_70064
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2021_597918
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14697
crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2020_1774591
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apergo_2022_103860
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2301840120
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsigen_2020_102370
crossref_primary_10_1080_13218719_2021_1938272
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14856
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_802439
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijlp_2023_101947
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2019_01_016
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_5364902
crossref_primary_10_1111_lcrp_12253
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scijus_2019_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1080_14999013_2021_1895377
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10597_022_01062_1
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1930297500009475
crossref_primary_10_1177_1745691619896608
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijlcj_2019_05_003
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_5151782
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_13836
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14848
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2021_110824
crossref_primary_10_1177_09637214231178745
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14845
crossref_primary_10_1177_00258024221080655
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11211_023_00408_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110652
crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2018_1497167
crossref_primary_10_14201_cp_32165
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_15609
crossref_primary_10_1111_fcre_12478
crossref_primary_10_1027_2151_2604_a000414
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scijus_2024_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_lcrp_12308
crossref_primary_10_1177_14613557211064054
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_15520
crossref_primary_10_1097_JFN_0000000000000277
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsisyn_2025_100584
crossref_primary_10_1080_15377938_2020_1754990
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14036
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ifacol_2022_10_108
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsidi_2020_301062
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsisyn_2024_100569
crossref_primary_10_1111_1556_4029_14435
crossref_primary_10_1108_MRR_11_2022_0793
Cites_doi 10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71747-X
10.1016/j.scijus.2013.11.003
10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00660-X
10.1111/1556-4029.12805
10.1111/1556-4029.13139
10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.003
10.1016/j.scijus.2012.10.004
10.1177/0146167204271570
10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.03.001
10.3758/PBR.17.2.161
10.1177/0146167202286008
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003
10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.009
10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
10.1037/a0028857
10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004
10.1111/1556-4029.13569
10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.012
10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x
10.1111/1556-4029.13091
10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.786
10.1353/bhm.1998.0159
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 American Psychological Association
2017 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
2017, American Psychological Association. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 American Psychological Association
– notice: 2017 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– notice: 2017, American Psychological Association. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7RZ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PSYQQ
DOI 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001
DatabaseName CrossRef
APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Psychology
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central (New)
PsycARTICLES
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Psychology


DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 2211-369X
EndPage 459
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_jarmac_2017_09_001
S2211368117300323
mac_6_4_452
GroupedDBID --M
.~1
0R~
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
7-5
7RZ
8P~
AADFP
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGJA
AAGUQ
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABIVO
ABMAC
ABOYX
ABVOZ
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ACXNI
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEHFB
AEIPS
AEKER
AEUPX
AFPUW
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIKHN
AITUG
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
AWKKM
AXJTR
AZXWR
BKOJK
BLXMC
CGNQK
EBS
EFLBG
EJD
EPA
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
KOM
M41
MO0
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OKEIE
OPA
OVD
P-8
P-9
PC.
PHGZT
PUEGO
Q38
ROL
SDF
SPCBC
SSB
SSZ
TEORI
ZPI
~G-
~HD
0SF
AACTN
AAIAV
ABYKQ
AFKWA
AFYLN
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
NCXOZ
RIG
SSY
T5K
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
PHGZM
PKEHL
PSYQQ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a369t-f7f772efdd54f04010f3920f8e337eb047c2fd4ebb80302ee92c32f4fff50cba3
ISICitedReferencesCount 94
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000418096600015&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2211-3681
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 14:58:30 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:22:22 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:28:53 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:19:17 EST 2024
Thu Sep 25 00:54:26 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Bias blind spot
Blind testing
Confirmation bias
Forensic science
Expert decision-making
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a369t-f7f772efdd54f04010f3920f8e337eb047c2fd4ebb80302ee92c32f4fff50cba3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
PQID 2624966139
PQPubID 5365181
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2624966139
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jarmac_2017_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jarmac_2017_09_001
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jarmac_2017_09_001
apa_psycarticlescurrent_mac_6_4_452
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20171200
December 2017
2017-12-00
20171201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2017
  text: 20171200
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Washigton
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washigton
PublicationTitle Journal of applied research in memory and cognition
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Elsevier Science
Elsevier Inc
Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Science
– name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
References Dror, I. E. 2016; 5
Laber, T. L. 2016; 61
Meissner, C. A. 2015; 60
Cole, S. A. 2010; 17
Steinman, M. A. 2001; 110
Morgan, R. 2014; 54
Dror, I. E. 2010; 17
Ha, Y.-W. 1987; 94
Serlin, R. C. 1982; 92
Thompson, W. C. 2003; 43
Dror, I. E. 2011; 51
Oliver, W. R. 2017
Nakhaeizadeh, S. 2014; 54
Ross, L. 2002; 28
Ross, L. 2005; 31
Kornfield, I. 2015; 60
Krane, D. 2015; 60
Morgan, R. 2017
Bennett, A. 2017; 276
Archer, M. S. 2016; 61
Klayman, J. 1987; 94
Thompson, W. C. 2015; 60
Dror, I. E. 2015; 60
Osborne, N. K. P. 2016; 61
Rando, C. 2017
Marascuilo, L. A. 1982; 92
Brekke, N. 1994; 116
Stanovich, K. E. 2012; 103
West, R. F. 2012; 103
Wilson, T. D. 1994; 116
Lin, D. Y. 2002; 28
Landfield, K. 2009; 4
Kaptchuk, T. J. 1998; 72
van den Eeden, C. A. J. 2016; 56
Lilienfeld, S. O. 2009; 4
Stevenage, S. V. 2017; 276
Kukucka, J. 2013; 2
Leadbetter, M. 2007; 33
Nakhaeizadeh, S. 2017
Risinger, D. M. 2003; 43
de Poot, C. J. 2016; 56
Dror, I. E. 2006; 56
Ammirati, R. 2009; 4
Shlipak, M. G. 2001; 110
Ehrlinger, J. 2005; 31
Hampikian, G. 2011; 51
Meserve, R. J. 2012; 103
Carr, J. 1982; 92
Found, B. 2013; 53
Kunda, Z. 1990; 108
Butt, L. 2013; 2
Ganas, J. 2013; 53
Wallman, J. F. 2016; 61
Nickerson, R. S. 1998; 2
Dror, I. E. 2017
Dror, I. E. 2013; 2
Gilovich, T. 2005; 31
Kassin, S. M. 2013; 2
Owens, G. 2016; 61
Saks, M. 2015; 60
Rosenthal, R. 2003; 43
Taylor, M. C. 2016; 61
Charlton, D. 2006; 56
Pronin, E. 2002; 28
Saks, M. J. 2003; 43
Dror, I. E. 2014; 54
McPhee, S. J. 2001; 110
Kish, P. E. 2016; 61
van Koppen, P. J. 2016; 56
Kukucka (bib0085) 2018
Simon (bib0160) 2012
National Academy of Sciences (bib0115) 2009
Bieber (bib0010) 2012
Found, Ganas (bib0060) 2013; 53
Nakhaeizadeh, Morgan, Rando, Dror (bib0110) 2017
Leadbetter (bib0095) 2007; 33
Dror, Thompson, Meissner, Kornfield, Krane, Saks (bib0040) 2015; 60
Stevenage, Bennett (bib0170) 2017; 276
Wilson, Brekke (bib0190) 1994; 116
Steinman, Shlipak, McPhee (bib0165) 2001; 110
Kunda (bib0090) 1990; 108
Ehrlinger, Gilovich, Ross (bib0050) 2005; 31
van den Eeden, de Poot, van Koppen (bib0180) 2016; 56
Dror (bib0020) 2016; 5
Dror, Cole (bib0030) 2010; 17
Klayman, Ha (bib0080) 1987; 94
Butt (bib0015) 2013; 2
Dror, Hampikian (bib0035) 2011; 51
Nakhaeizadeh, Dror, Morgan (bib0105) 2014; 54
National Commission on Forensic Science (bib0120) 2015
Oliver (bib0130) 2017
Serlin, Carr, Marascuilo (bib0155) 1982; 92
Gilbert (bib0065) 1993
Rosenthal (bib0145) 1966
Taylor, Laber, Kish, Owens, Osborne (bib0175) 2016; 61
Dror, Charlton (bib0025) 2006; 56
West, Meserve, Stanovich (bib0185) 2012; 103
Archer, Wallman (bib0005) 2016; 61
Saks, Risinger, Rosenthal, Thompson (bib0150) 2003; 43
Dror, Kassin, Kukucka (bib0045) 2013; 2
Kaptchuk (bib0070) 1998; 72
Kassin, Dror, Kukucka (bib0075) 2013; 2
Lilienfeld, Ammirati, Landfield (bib0100) 2009; 4
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (bib0135) 2016
Pronin, Lin, Ross (bib0140) 2002; 28
Nickerson (bib0125) 1998; 2
Dror (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0025) 2006; 56
Taylor (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0175) 2016; 61
Kaptchuk (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0070) 1998; 72
Ehrlinger (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0050) 2005; 31
Bieber (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0010) 2012
Archer (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0005) 2016; 61
Nickerson (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0125) 1998; 2
Leadbetter (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0095) 2007; 33
Pronin (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0140) 2002; 28
Gilbert (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0065) 1993
Rosenthal (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0145) 1966
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0135) 2016
Serlin (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0155) 1982; 92
Stevenage (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0170) 2017; 276
van den Eeden (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0180) 2016; 56
Klayman (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0080) 1987; 94
Wilson (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0190) 1994; 116
Kukucka (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0085) 2018
National Academy of Sciences (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0115) 2009
Dror (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0045) 2013; 2
Kunda (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0090) 1990; 108
Dror (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0040) 2015; 60
Saks (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0150) 2003; 43
National Commission on Forensic Science (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0120) 2015
West (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0185) 2012; 103
Nakhaeizadeh (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0105) 2014; 54
Oliver (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0130) 2017
Dror (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0020) 2016; 5
Kassin (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0075) 2013; 2
Butt (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0015) 2013; 2
Steinman (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0165) 2001; 110
Found (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0060) 2013; 53
Dror (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0035) 2011; 51
Nakhaeizadeh (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0110) 2017
Dror (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0030) 2010; 17
Lilienfeld (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0100) 2009; 4
Simon (10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0160) 2012
References_xml – volume: 43
  start-page: 77
  year: 2003
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 110
  start-page: 551
  year: 2001
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions
  publication-title: American Journal of Medicine
– volume: 2
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  end-page: 52
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 17
  start-page: 161
  year: 2010
  end-page: 167
  article-title: The vision in "blind" justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition
  publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
– volume: 108
  start-page: 480
  year: 1990
  end-page: 498
  article-title: The case for motivated reasoning
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 92
  start-page: 786
  year: 1982
  end-page: 790
  article-title: A measure of association for selected nonparametric procedures
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 54
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  end-page: 214
  article-title: Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 54
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  end-page: 214
  article-title: Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 276
  start-page: 93
  year: 2017
  end-page: 106
  article-title: A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results
  publication-title: Forensic Science International
– volume: 94
  start-page: 211
  year: 1987
  end-page: 228
  article-title: Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 51
  start-page: 204
  year: 2011
  end-page: 208
  article-title: Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
  publication-title: Science and Justice
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1270
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1277
  article-title: Context effects in forensic entomology and use of sequential unmasking in casework
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 56
  start-page: 475
  year: 2016
  end-page: 481
  article-title: Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 56
  start-page: 475
  year: 2016
  end-page: 481
  article-title: Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 92
  start-page: 786
  year: 1982
  end-page: 790
  article-title: A measure of association for selected nonparametric procedures
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 110
  start-page: 551
  year: 2001
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions
  publication-title: American Journal of Medicine
– volume: 43
  start-page: 77
  year: 2003
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  end-page: 927
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 5
  start-page: 121
  year: 2016
  end-page: 127
  article-title: A hierarchy of expert performance
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1270
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1277
  article-title: Context effects in forensic entomology and use of sequential unmasking in casework
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 56
  start-page: 600
  year: 2006
  end-page: 616
  article-title: Why experts make errors
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Identification
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 116
  start-page: 117
  year: 1994
  end-page: 142
  article-title: Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 53
  start-page: 154
  year: 2013
  end-page: 158
  article-title: The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
  publication-title: Science and Justice
– volume: 56
  start-page: 475
  year: 2016
  end-page: 481
  article-title: Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– year: 2017
  article-title: Effects of history and context on forensic pathologist interpretation of photographs of patterned injury of the skin
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 31
  start-page: 680
  year: 2005
  end-page: 692
  article-title: Peering into the bias blind spot: People's assessments of bias in themselves and others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 103
  start-page: 506
  year: 2012
  end-page: 519
  article-title: Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  end-page: 927
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 53
  start-page: 154
  year: 2013
  end-page: 158
  article-title: The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
  publication-title: Science and Justice
– volume: 276
  start-page: 93
  year: 2017
  end-page: 106
  article-title: A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results
  publication-title: Forensic Science International
– volume: 31
  start-page: 680
  year: 2005
  end-page: 692
  article-title: Peering into the bias blind spot: People's assessments of bias in themselves and others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– year: 2017
  article-title: Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 116
  start-page: 117
  year: 1994
  end-page: 142
  article-title: Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 110
  start-page: 551
  year: 2001
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions
  publication-title: American Journal of Medicine
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 2
  start-page: 78
  year: 2013
  end-page: 81
  article-title: New application of psychology to law: Improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 28
  start-page: 369
  year: 2002
  end-page: 381
  article-title: The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 4
  start-page: 390
  year: 2009
  end-page: 398
  article-title: Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare?
  publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science
– volume: 2
  start-page: 175
  year: 1998
  end-page: 220
  article-title: Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises
  publication-title: Review of General Psychology
– year: 2017
  article-title: Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  end-page: 927
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 2
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  end-page: 52
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 31
  start-page: 680
  year: 2005
  end-page: 692
  article-title: Peering into the bias blind spot: People's assessments of bias in themselves and others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 56
  start-page: 600
  year: 2006
  end-page: 616
  article-title: Why experts make errors
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Identification
– volume: 54
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  end-page: 214
  article-title: Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 103
  start-page: 506
  year: 2012
  end-page: 519
  article-title: Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
– volume: 4
  start-page: 390
  year: 2009
  end-page: 398
  article-title: Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare?
  publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science
– year: 2017
  article-title: Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 2
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  end-page: 52
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 2
  start-page: 78
  year: 2013
  end-page: 81
  article-title: New application of psychology to law: Improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 94
  start-page: 211
  year: 1987
  end-page: 228
  article-title: Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  end-page: 927
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 92
  start-page: 786
  year: 1982
  end-page: 790
  article-title: A measure of association for selected nonparametric procedures
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 2
  start-page: 59
  year: 2013
  end-page: 60
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions: Commentary by a forensic examiner
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 17
  start-page: 161
  year: 2010
  end-page: 167
  article-title: The vision in "blind" justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition
  publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
– year: 2017
  article-title: Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 43
  start-page: 77
  year: 2003
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 103
  start-page: 506
  year: 2012
  end-page: 519
  article-title: Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
– volume: 4
  start-page: 390
  year: 2009
  end-page: 398
  article-title: Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare?
  publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science
– volume: 72
  start-page: 389
  year: 1998
  end-page: 433
  article-title: Intentional ignorance: A history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine
  publication-title: Bulletin of the History of Medicine
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  end-page: 927
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 51
  start-page: 204
  year: 2011
  end-page: 208
  article-title: Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
  publication-title: Science and Justice
– volume: 28
  start-page: 369
  year: 2002
  end-page: 381
  article-title: The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 2
  start-page: 78
  year: 2013
  end-page: 81
  article-title: New application of psychology to law: Improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 28
  start-page: 369
  year: 2002
  end-page: 381
  article-title: The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 33
  year: 2007
  article-title: Letter to the editor
  publication-title: Fingerprint World
– volume: 43
  start-page: 77
  year: 2003
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– year: 2018
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: Confirmation bias in the forensic sciences: Causes, consequences, and countermeasures
  publication-title: Forensic science reform: The psychology and sociology of wrongful convictions
– volume: 92
  start-page: 786
  year: 1982
  end-page: 790
  ident: bib0155
  article-title: A measure of association for selected nonparametric procedures
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– start-page: 57
  year: 1993
  end-page: 87
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: The assent of man: Mental representation and the control of belief
  publication-title: Handbook of mental control
– volume: 276
  start-page: 93
  year: 2017
  end-page: 106
  ident: bib0170
  article-title: A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results
  publication-title: Forensic Science International
– year: 2009
  ident: bib0115
  article-title: Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward
– volume: 53
  start-page: 154
  year: 2013
  end-page: 158
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
  publication-title: Science and Justice
– year: 2017
  ident: bib0110
  article-title: Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– year: 1966
  ident: bib0145
  article-title: Experimenter effects in behavioral research
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1270
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1277
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Context effects in forensic entomology and use of sequential unmasking in casework
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 2
  start-page: 175
  year: 1998
  end-page: 220
  ident: bib0125
  article-title: Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises
  publication-title: Review of General Psychology
– year: 2015
  ident: bib0120
  article-title: Ensuring that forensic analysis is based upon task-relevant information
– volume: 2
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  end-page: 52
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 56
  start-page: 600
  year: 2006
  end-page: 616
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Why experts make errors
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Identification
– volume: 43
  start-page: 77
  year: 2003
  end-page: 90
  ident: bib0150
  article-title: Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 17
  start-page: 161
  year: 2010
  end-page: 167
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition
  publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
– volume: 94
  start-page: 211
  year: 1987
  end-page: 228
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 31
  start-page: 680
  year: 2005
  end-page: 692
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: Peering into the bias blind spot: People's assessments of bias in themselves and others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– year: 2012
  ident: bib0160
  article-title: In doubt: The psychology of the criminal justice process
– volume: 72
  start-page: 389
  year: 1998
  end-page: 433
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: Intentional ignorance: A history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine
  publication-title: Bulletin of the History of Medicine
– year: 2017
  ident: bib0130
  article-title: Effects of history and context on forensic pathologist interpretation of photographs of patterned injury of the skin
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 108
  start-page: 480
  year: 1990
  end-page: 498
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: The case for motivated reasoning
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 33
  start-page: 231
  year: 2007
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Letter to the editor
  publication-title: Fingerprint World
– volume: 2
  start-page: 78
  year: 2013
  end-page: 81
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: New application of psychology to law: Improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– year: 2012
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Measuring the impact of cognitive bias in fire investigation
  publication-title: Proceedings of the international symposium on fire investigation, science and technology
– volume: 103
  start-page: 506
  year: 2012
  end-page: 519
  ident: bib0185
  article-title: Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
– volume: 56
  start-page: 475
  year: 2016
  end-page: 481
  ident: bib0180
  article-title: Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– volume: 116
  start-page: 117
  year: 1994
  end-page: 142
  ident: bib0190
  article-title: Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 54
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  end-page: 214
  ident: bib0105
  article-title: Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
  publication-title: Science & Justice
– year: 2016
  ident: bib0135
  article-title: Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods
– volume: 2
  start-page: 59
  year: 2013
  end-page: 60
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions: Commentary by a forensic examiner
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1112
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 5
  start-page: 121
  year: 2016
  end-page: 127
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: A hierarchy of expert performance
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
– volume: 28
  start-page: 369
  year: 2002
  end-page: 381
  ident: bib0140
  article-title: The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  end-page: 927
  ident: bib0175
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 51
  start-page: 204
  year: 2011
  end-page: 208
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
  publication-title: Science and Justice
– volume: 4
  start-page: 390
  year: 2009
  end-page: 398
  ident: bib0100
  article-title: Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare?
  publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science
– volume: 110
  start-page: 551
  year: 2001
  end-page: 557
  ident: bib0165
  article-title: Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions
  publication-title: American Journal of Medicine
– volume: 33
  start-page: 231
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0095
  article-title: Letter to the editor
  publication-title: Fingerprint World
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0115
– volume: 43
  start-page: 77
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0150
  article-title: Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
  publication-title: Science & Justice
  doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71747-X
– volume: 56
  start-page: 600
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0025
  article-title: Why experts make errors
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Identification
– volume: 54
  start-page: 208
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0105
  article-title: Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
  publication-title: Science & Justice
  doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.11.003
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0130
  article-title: Effects of history and context on forensic pathologist interpretation of photographs of patterned injury of the skin
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
– volume: 110
  start-page: 551
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0165
  article-title: Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions
  publication-title: American Journal of Medicine
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00660-X
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1111
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0040
  article-title: Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
  doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12805
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1270
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0005
  article-title: Context effects in forensic entomology and use of sequential unmasking in casework
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
  doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13139
– volume: 2
  start-page: 78
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0045
  article-title: New application of psychology to law: Improving forensic evidence and expert witness contributions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.003
– volume: 53
  start-page: 154
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0060
  article-title: The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework
  publication-title: Science and Justice
  doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.10.004
– volume: 31
  start-page: 680
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0050
  article-title: Peering into the bias blind spot: People's assessments of bias in themselves and others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  doi: 10.1177/0146167204271570
– volume: 5
  start-page: 121
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0020
  article-title: A hierarchy of expert performance
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.03.001
– volume: 17
  start-page: 161
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0030
  article-title: The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition
  publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.161
– year: 1966
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0145
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0085
  article-title: Confirmation bias in the forensic sciences: Causes, consequences, and countermeasures
– volume: 28
  start-page: 369
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0140
  article-title: The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others
  publication-title: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  doi: 10.1177/0146167202286008
– volume: 56
  start-page: 475
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0180
  article-title: Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information
  publication-title: Science & Justice
  doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0160
– volume: 94
  start-page: 211
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0080
  article-title: Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 276
  start-page: 93
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0170
  article-title: A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results
  publication-title: Forensic Science International
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.009
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0010
  article-title: Measuring the impact of cognitive bias in fire investigation
– volume: 108
  start-page: 480
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0090
  article-title: The case for motivated reasoning
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
– volume: 2
  start-page: 175
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0125
  article-title: Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises
  publication-title: Review of General Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
– start-page: 57
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0065
  article-title: The assent of man: Mental representation and the control of belief
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0135
– volume: 2
  start-page: 42
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0075
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
– volume: 103
  start-page: 506
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0185
  article-title: Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/a0028857
– volume: 51
  start-page: 204
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0035
  article-title: Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
  publication-title: Science and Justice
  doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0110
  article-title: Cascading bias of initial exposure to information at the crime scene to the subsequent evaluation of skeletal remains
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
  doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13569
– volume: 2
  start-page: 59
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0015
  article-title: The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions: Commentary by a forensic examiner
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.012
– volume: 116
  start-page: 117
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0190
  article-title: Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
– volume: 4
  start-page: 390
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0100
  article-title: Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare?
  publication-title: Perspectives on Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x
– volume: 61
  start-page: 922
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0175
  article-title: The reliability of pattern classification in bloodstain pattern analysis. Part 1: Bloodstain patterns on rigid non-absorbent surfaces
  publication-title: Journal of Forensic Sciences
  doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13091
– volume: 92
  start-page: 786
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0155
  article-title: A measure of association for selected nonparametric procedures
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.786
– volume: 72
  start-page: 389
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0070
  article-title: Intentional ignorance: A history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine
  publication-title: Bulletin of the History of Medicine
  doi: 10.1353/bhm.1998.0159
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001_bib0120
SSID ssj0000601221
Score 2.4032238
Snippet Exposure to irrelevant contextual information prompts confirmation-biased judgments of forensic science evidence (Kassin, Dror, & Kukucka, 2013). Nevertheless,...
SourceID proquest
crossref
elsevier
apa
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 452
SubjectTerms Bias blind spot
Blind testing
Blindsight
Cognitive Bias
Confirmation Bias
Decision Making
Expert decision-making
Female
Forensic Evaluation
Forensic science
Human
Judgment
Male
Title Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners
URI http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/mac/6/4/452
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2624966139
Volume 6
WOSCitedRecordID wos000418096600015&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2211-369X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000601221
  issn: 2211-3681
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20151201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9swFBZZu4e-jF1Zum4Itrdg48jyrW-hy1g3VgbrIG9CsiVImrohiUP6z_rzdmRdYlrWrg97MUGOjazzWefz0TmfEPpEVZ6LOEmDhAoeUPChQV6JPAB3MszgI1cLkLSbTWRnZ_lkUvzs9W5cLcxmntV1vt0Wi_9qamgDY-vS2UeY298UGuA3GB2OYHY4_pPhT3xCkJhyo8AsgEtWek4zdehWBGTVLDeyXWAH4qrz2MuBK_KRW36pqwJXf-Gu3HJXKxXURk0udc7uta2Ta7vQWeFvLprygrvSMd8MzN1oGPzizXzwI_RhbL5Qht_qDQSmfDDypz4vTYDhdD2V88E47IYtwBXuUkDa2Y0QrZ-Ymv1aQtlta_fW9dNz2kEh7Uy11CjfWq9Nja74HYdgYhOzcNYuEOhUviw0EqU7B-gW_W_5RZ-t6BLhZszchem7sKjQ-YBP0D7JkgJcwv7odDz55uN7WueGtGV__kld5WabXni3Q_fzo1tMoaU_58_RM2t7PDJ4e4F6sn6JDrz7vH6FvnvgYQ08DEDAHnjHeIQN7LCBHb5S2MEOW9hhD7vX6PeX8fnJ18Bu1RFwsNc6UJmCzzSpqiqhCvzCMFJAvCOVyzjOpIhoVhJVUSkEvP0RkbIgZUwUVUolUSl4_Abt1Ve1fItwLooo4nwINCmneUrFkGcKWKQqFCdpGffRRxgmposBXO5oaaTMmLZNyigDaPRR7IaRlVbtXm-6Mmf3WbOPAn_Vwqi9PPD_zFmI2aEyTJQB_h648sgZlNnJY8VISmgBjxoXh4_syDt0sHvJjtDeetnI9-hpuVlPV8sPFpt_ABZJwis
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive+bias+and+blindness%3A+A+global+survey+of+forensic+science+examiners&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+research+in+memory+and+cognition&rft.au=Kukucka%2C+Jeff&rft.au=Kassin%2C+Saul+M.&rft.au=Zapf%2C+Patricia+A.&rft.au=Dror%2C+Itiel+E.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.issn=2211-3681&rft.eissn=2211-369X&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=459&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jarmac.2017.09.001&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jarmac_2017_09_001
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2211-3681&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2211-3681&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2211-3681&client=summon