Non-invasive detection of fractures, fracture zones, and rock damage in a hard rock excavation — Experience from the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory in Sweden

A key requirement for licensing of the construction of underground repositories for nuclear waste is the demonstrated capability to verify design assumptions involving the presence and extent of the excavation damage zone around tunnels, shafts, emplacement holes and caverns. As part of ongoing work...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering geology Vol. 196; pp. 210 - 221
Main Authors: Walton, G., Lato, M., Anschütz, H., Perras, M.A., Diederichs, M.S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 28.09.2015
Subjects:
engineering
Excavation Damage Zone
Geophysical mapping
geophysics
Ground Penetrating Radar
LiDAR
radioactive waste
Resistivity survey
surveys
Sweden
topography
Sweden
Ground Penetrating Radar
Geophysical mapping
Resistivity survey
Excavation Damage Zone
LiDAR
ISSN:0013-7952, 1872-6917
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A key requirement for licensing of the construction of underground repositories for nuclear waste is the demonstrated capability to verify design assumptions involving the presence and extent of the excavation damage zone around tunnels, shafts, emplacement holes and caverns. As part of ongoing work to select and refine key technologies and techniques towards this end, geophysical surveys were performed at two locations within the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory in Sweden. Earth resistivity (RES), induced polarization (IP), and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data were collected using a variety of survey parameters; Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data were collected as a reference for surface structures, surface topography, and site geology. Based on an analysis of the data, models for the Highly Damaged Zone (HDZ) and Excavation Damage Zone (EDZ) at both sites were developed. The HDZ was found to be approximately 5 to 10cm in thickness, and the EDZ was found to extend between 15 and 35cm below the excavation surface. Two-dimensional (2D) RES profiling generated the most reliable assessment of the HDZ, whereas chargeability data and GPR data were more useful in the estimation of the EDZ dimensions. •Geophysical data were collected at two sites in the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory.•The influences of several survey parameters on resistivity results are investigated.•GPR and resistivity data are used for fracture detection and EDZ delineation.•Results are compared to borehole observations to interpret rockmass damage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-7952
1872-6917
DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.07.010