Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter

Online social media has become an important platform to organize around different socio-cultural and political topics. An extensive scholarship has discussed how people are divided into echo-chamber-like groups. However, there is a lack of work related to quantifying hostile communication or affecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining pp. 443 - 447
Main Authors: Tyagi, Aman, Uyheng, Joshua, Carley, Kathleen M.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: IEEE 07.12.2020
Subjects:
affective polarization
Blogs
Climate change
Meteorology
online social networks
Scholarships
Social networking (online)
stance detection
Systematics
ISSN:2473-991X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Online social media has become an important platform to organize around different socio-cultural and political topics. An extensive scholarship has discussed how people are divided into echo-chamber-like groups. However, there is a lack of work related to quantifying hostile communication or affective polarization between two competing groups. This paper proposes a systematic, network-based methodology for examining affective polarization in online conversations. Further, we apply our framework to 100 weeks of Twitter discourse about climate change. We find that deniers of climate change (Disbelievers) are more hostile towards people who believe (Believers) in the anthropogenic cause of climate change than vice versa. Moreover, Disbelievers use more words and hashtags related to natural disasters during more hostile weeks as compared to Believers. These findings bear implications for studying affective polarization in online discourse, especially concerning the subject of climate change. Lastly, we discuss our findings in the context of increasingly important climate change communication research.
ISSN:2473-991X
DOI:10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381419