Promoting students' creative and design thinking with generative AI-supported co-regulated learning: Evidence from digital game development projects in healthcare courses

Fostering students' problem-solving abilities and design thinking has been recognized as a crucial educational objective. In the conventional collaborative project-based learning approach, co-regulative learning (CRL) has been adopted to guide learners to plan and monitor the progress of their...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Educational Technology & Society Ročník 27; číslo 4; s. 487 - 502
Hlavný autor: Huang, Hsin
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society 01.10.2024
International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
International Forum of Educational Technology & Society
Predmet:
ISSN:1176-3647, 1436-4522, 1436-4522
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Fostering students' problem-solving abilities and design thinking has been recognized as a crucial educational objective. In the conventional collaborative project-based learning approach, co-regulative learning (CRL) has been adopted to guide learners to plan and monitor the progress of their projects. However, without providing adequate supports or feedback to individual teams, the innovation and design quality of the project outcomes could be disappointing. In this study, a generative AI (artificial intelligence)-based co-regulative learning (GAI-CRL) approach is proposed to address this issue. Moreover, an experiment was conducted in a digital game development (DGD) to assess this approach. A total of 46 university students from two classes were recruited in this study. The experimental group adopted the GAI-CRL approach, while the control group adopted the conventional CRL (C-CRL) approach. The results showed that the GAI-CRL approach significantly enhanced students' project design performance, learning motivation, self-efficacy, and creative thinking compared to the C-CRL approach. This study serves as a reference not only for implementing DGD projects but also for applying CRL to other educational domains.
ISSN:1176-3647
1436-4522
1436-4522
DOI:10.30191/ETS.202410_27(4).TP04