Developing consensus for culturally informed forensic mental health assessment: Experts' opinions on best practices

Individuals with minoritized identities are overrepresented in legal system contexts; thus, forensic mental health professionals conduct evaluations of examinees with a diversity of identities. Professional and ethical guidelines direct that these evaluations be completed in a culturally informed ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and human behavior Vol. 47; no. 3; p. 385
Main Authors: Fanniff, Amanda M, York, Taylor, Gutierrez, Renee
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01.06.2023
Subjects:
ISSN:1573-661X, 1573-661X
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Individuals with minoritized identities are overrepresented in legal system contexts; thus, forensic mental health professionals conduct evaluations of examinees with a diversity of identities. Professional and ethical guidelines direct that these evaluations be completed in a culturally informed manner, yet many professionals still identify a need for specific guidance on how to do so. In the present study, we sought to establish consensus regarding best practices in incorporating culture into forensic mental health evaluations. Given the exploratory nature of this research, no formal hypotheses were tested. We expected that participants would concur that some practices are important to completing culturally informed forensic evaluations. We recruited two samples. Nine people with joint expertise in cultural considerations and forensic evaluations participated in a Delphi-type poll. More than half reported a minoritized racial/ethnic identity, and all identified as a man (56%) or woman (44%). Experts were surveyed regarding importance (two rounds) and relevance (one round) of recommended practices. They contributed seven additional relevant practices. Twenty-one board-certified forensic psychologists completed a one-time survey of their perceptions of best practices. These psychologists primarily identified as White (90%), and most did not identify as Hispanic or Latine (80%). They all identified as men (45%) or women (55%). This sample was asked to rate the importance of a list of practices refined during the Delphi-type poll. The majority of practices were considered important or very important by experts and board-certified psychologists. Consensus is most clear for 28 practices with means, medians, and modes all in the "important" to "very important" range at all time points. There is wide agreement on the importance of particular methods for incorporating cultural considerations in each phase of the forensic evaluation process. Forensic psychologists can use this information to self-evaluate and improve their practice and to inform training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
AbstractList Individuals with minoritized identities are overrepresented in legal system contexts; thus, forensic mental health professionals conduct evaluations of examinees with a diversity of identities. Professional and ethical guidelines direct that these evaluations be completed in a culturally informed manner, yet many professionals still identify a need for specific guidance on how to do so. In the present study, we sought to establish consensus regarding best practices in incorporating culture into forensic mental health evaluations.OBJECTIVEIndividuals with minoritized identities are overrepresented in legal system contexts; thus, forensic mental health professionals conduct evaluations of examinees with a diversity of identities. Professional and ethical guidelines direct that these evaluations be completed in a culturally informed manner, yet many professionals still identify a need for specific guidance on how to do so. In the present study, we sought to establish consensus regarding best practices in incorporating culture into forensic mental health evaluations.Given the exploratory nature of this research, no formal hypotheses were tested. We expected that participants would concur that some practices are important to completing culturally informed forensic evaluations.HYPOTHESESGiven the exploratory nature of this research, no formal hypotheses were tested. We expected that participants would concur that some practices are important to completing culturally informed forensic evaluations.We recruited two samples. Nine people with joint expertise in cultural considerations and forensic evaluations participated in a Delphi-type poll. More than half reported a minoritized racial/ethnic identity, and all identified as a man (56%) or woman (44%). Experts were surveyed regarding importance (two rounds) and relevance (one round) of recommended practices. They contributed seven additional relevant practices. Twenty-one board-certified forensic psychologists completed a one-time survey of their perceptions of best practices. These psychologists primarily identified as White (90%), and most did not identify as Hispanic or Latine (80%). They all identified as men (45%) or women (55%). This sample was asked to rate the importance of a list of practices refined during the Delphi-type poll.METHODWe recruited two samples. Nine people with joint expertise in cultural considerations and forensic evaluations participated in a Delphi-type poll. More than half reported a minoritized racial/ethnic identity, and all identified as a man (56%) or woman (44%). Experts were surveyed regarding importance (two rounds) and relevance (one round) of recommended practices. They contributed seven additional relevant practices. Twenty-one board-certified forensic psychologists completed a one-time survey of their perceptions of best practices. These psychologists primarily identified as White (90%), and most did not identify as Hispanic or Latine (80%). They all identified as men (45%) or women (55%). This sample was asked to rate the importance of a list of practices refined during the Delphi-type poll.The majority of practices were considered important or very important by experts and board-certified psychologists. Consensus is most clear for 28 practices with means, medians, and modes all in the "important" to "very important" range at all time points.RESULTSThe majority of practices were considered important or very important by experts and board-certified psychologists. Consensus is most clear for 28 practices with means, medians, and modes all in the "important" to "very important" range at all time points.There is wide agreement on the importance of particular methods for incorporating cultural considerations in each phase of the forensic evaluation process. Forensic psychologists can use this information to self-evaluate and improve their practice and to inform training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).CONCLUSIONSThere is wide agreement on the importance of particular methods for incorporating cultural considerations in each phase of the forensic evaluation process. Forensic psychologists can use this information to self-evaluate and improve their practice and to inform training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Individuals with minoritized identities are overrepresented in legal system contexts; thus, forensic mental health professionals conduct evaluations of examinees with a diversity of identities. Professional and ethical guidelines direct that these evaluations be completed in a culturally informed manner, yet many professionals still identify a need for specific guidance on how to do so. In the present study, we sought to establish consensus regarding best practices in incorporating culture into forensic mental health evaluations. Given the exploratory nature of this research, no formal hypotheses were tested. We expected that participants would concur that some practices are important to completing culturally informed forensic evaluations. We recruited two samples. Nine people with joint expertise in cultural considerations and forensic evaluations participated in a Delphi-type poll. More than half reported a minoritized racial/ethnic identity, and all identified as a man (56%) or woman (44%). Experts were surveyed regarding importance (two rounds) and relevance (one round) of recommended practices. They contributed seven additional relevant practices. Twenty-one board-certified forensic psychologists completed a one-time survey of their perceptions of best practices. These psychologists primarily identified as White (90%), and most did not identify as Hispanic or Latine (80%). They all identified as men (45%) or women (55%). This sample was asked to rate the importance of a list of practices refined during the Delphi-type poll. The majority of practices were considered important or very important by experts and board-certified psychologists. Consensus is most clear for 28 practices with means, medians, and modes all in the "important" to "very important" range at all time points. There is wide agreement on the importance of particular methods for incorporating cultural considerations in each phase of the forensic evaluation process. Forensic psychologists can use this information to self-evaluate and improve their practice and to inform training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Author Fanniff, Amanda M
York, Taylor
Gutierrez, Renee
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Amanda M
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1345-1364
  surname: Fanniff
  fullname: Fanniff, Amanda M
  organization: Psychology Department, Palo Alto University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Taylor
  surname: York
  fullname: York, Taylor
  organization: Psychology Department, Palo Alto University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Renee
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6025-3390
  surname: Gutierrez
  fullname: Gutierrez, Renee
  organization: Psychology Department, Palo Alto University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37326547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkM1Lw0AQxRepWFu9-AfI3vQS3d1kP-JNav2AghcFb2GzmdjIdhMzidj_3i1WcC4zPH485r0ZmYQ2ACFnnF1xluprvy5ZHJnyA3LMpU4Tpfjb5N89JTPEj8jkhskjMk11KpTM9DHBO_gC33ZNeKeuDQgBR6R121M3-mHsrfdb2oQobKDa6RFoHN1AGKyna7B-WFOLCIg77YYuvzvoB7ygO88mOtI20BJwoF1v3dA4wBNyWFuPcLrfc_J6v3xZPCar54enxe0qsankQwJOM1VVSnJmas5NVmUpM6VzGvJcmFRnVZ6rWknDXMakyVlMVGujJWipcyfm5PLXt-vbzzG-UGwadOC9DdCOWAgjtFBCGBnR8z06ljFo0fXNxvbb4q8o8QNzXGzm
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s12207_023_09489_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijlp_2025_102154
crossref_primary_10_1177_00111287251331579
crossref_primary_10_1080_00223891_2025_2460992
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11920_023_01480_2
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1037/lhb0000531
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
Sociology & Social History
Law
EISSN 1573-661X
ExternalDocumentID 37326547
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-Y2
-~C
-~X
.4L
.86
0-V
0R~
1SB
2.D
28-
29L
2JY
2P1
2VQ
4.4
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7RZ
7WY
7X7
85S
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FL
8G5
8TC
8UJ
8VB
AACLI
AAIAL
AARHV
AAYZH
ABACO
ABIVO
ABMNI
ABNCP
ABQSL
ABTEG
ABUWG
ABVOZ
ACBXY
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACOMO
ACPQG
ACYUM
ADBBV
ADEPB
ADHKG
ADIMF
ADKPE
ADMHG
ADNFJ
ADRFC
ADUOI
AEFIE
AEGNC
AEHFB
AFACB
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFFNX
AFGCZ
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFXCU
AGJBK
AGQPQ
AGQRV
AHBYD
AHEHV
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHQJS
AHSBF
AKVCP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AMKLP
AQUVI
ARALO
AWKKM
AZQEC
AZXWR
BA0
BBWZM
BENPR
BEZIV
BGNMA
BGRYB
BHRNT
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
CGNQK
CGR
COF
CS3
CSCUP
CUY
CVF
DL5
DU5
DWQXO
D~-
EBS
EBU
ECM
EHE
EIF
EJD
EKAWT
EPA
F5P
FEDTE
FM.
FRNLG
FTD
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
GUQSH
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HGD
HISYW
HLICF
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
ISO
IXC
IZQ
I~X
K1G
K60
K6~
KDC
KOV
KOW
LAK
LXHRH
M0C
M0O
M0T
M1P
M2M
M2O
M4Y
M86
N2Q
NB0
NDZJH
NPM
NU0
O-J
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
OAM
OPA
OVD
P19
P2P
PADUT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
Q2X
QF4
QN5
QN7
QOK
QOS
QWB
R4E
R9I
RHO
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RWL
RXW
RZC
RZD
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
SBS
SDH
SDM
SOJ
T13
T16
TAA
TAC
TAF
TEORI
TH9
TSK
U2A
UKHRP
UMC
VC2
W2G
W48
WHG
WIP
WK6
WK8
YQR
YQT
YZZ
ZCA
ZCG
ZL0
ZMU
ZPI
~8M
~EX
7X8
ADXHL
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-ec706dd65108f1184d4308bcc7e9928374d996f6580c405890547f7875e7579c2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 9
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001009892000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1573-661X
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 06:15:19 EDT 2025
Sun May 11 04:08:11 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a351t-ec706dd65108f1184d4308bcc7e9928374d996f6580c405890547f7875e7579c2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1345-1364
0000-0001-6025-3390
PMID 37326547
PQID 2827262285
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2827262285
pubmed_primary_37326547
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Law and human behavior
PublicationTitleAlternate Law Hum Behav
PublicationYear 2023
SSID ssj0009805
Score 2.4206436
Snippet Individuals with minoritized identities are overrepresented in legal system contexts; thus, forensic mental health professionals conduct evaluations of...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 385
SubjectTerms Consensus
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Health
Title Developing consensus for culturally informed forensic mental health assessment: Experts' opinions on best practices
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37326547
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2827262285
Volume 47
WOSCitedRecordID wos001009892000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwED5RytCFR3m1PHRICKYIN05ihwUhoGIoVQeQulWpYwukKi2kBfXfc46TsjAgsWSIlJdzd_7Ovvs-gPNOrAKjyJGYMb4XJInyYh1LLxnLkCkeSeF4Znui35fDYTwoF9zysqyyiolFoE6nyq6RX1FqIPzI92V4M3v3rGqU3V0tJTRqUOcEZaxVi-EPW3gsixLGTii4R_PQsKIn5eJq8lrAo7AUl_sVWhZTTHfrvy-3DZsluMRbZw07sKazJtR6yVcTGqtIt2xCe9WmghfoGnTR8YUsdyG_X_VRobK11lm-yJGwLVYsHZMlOr5VndrztgReoRMJQNdXicmK8PMaCzbleX6J9p7WynGa4Zg-DqsWrXwPXroPz3ePXinN4CU87Mw9rQSL0jQij5aGcpQgDTiTY6WEjmNLqBOklEgZgjdMBVa5kJChMBQcQi1CESt_H9azaaYPAYW03bUhMwTEAhOxhCAd8w2PmNEy4LoFZ9WYj8j07X5GkunpIh_9jHoLDtyPG80cR8eIC8Kl9Mz2H64-goYVkXcFYMdQN-T4-gQ21Of8Lf84LWyKjv3B0zcs8dcQ
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing+consensus+for+culturally+informed+forensic+mental+health+assessment%3A+Experts%27+opinions+on+best+practices&rft.jtitle=Law+and+human+behavior&rft.au=Fanniff%2C+Amanda+M&rft.au=York%2C+Taylor&rft.au=Gutierrez%2C+Renee&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.issn=1573-661X&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Flhb0000531&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1573-661X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1573-661X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1573-661X&client=summon