Modeling Interfacial Dynamics on Single Atom Electrocatalysts: Explicit Solvation and Potential Dependence

ConspectusSingle atom electrocatalysts, with noble metal-free composition, maximal atom efficiency, and exceptional reactivity toward various energy and environmental applications, have become a research hot spot in the recent decade. Their simplicity and the isolated nature of the atomic structure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounts of chemical research Vol. 57; no. 2; p. 198
Main Authors: Zhang, Zisheng, Li, Jun, Wang, Yang-Gang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 16.01.2024
ISSN:1520-4898, 1520-4898
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract ConspectusSingle atom electrocatalysts, with noble metal-free composition, maximal atom efficiency, and exceptional reactivity toward various energy and environmental applications, have become a research hot spot in the recent decade. Their simplicity and the isolated nature of the atomic structure of their active site have also made them an ideal model catalyst system for studying reaction mechanisms and activity trends. However, the state of the single atom active sites during electrochemical reactions may not be as simple as is usually assumed. To the contrary, the single atom electrocatalysts have been reported to be under greater influence from interfacial dynamics, with solvent and electrolyte ions perpetually interacting with the electrified active center under an applied electrode potential. These complexities render the activity trends and reaction mechanisms derived from simplistic models dubious.In this Account, with a few popular single atom electrocatalysis systems, we show how the change in electrochemical potential induces nontrivial variation in the free energy profile of elemental electrochemical reaction steps, demonstrate how the active centers with different electronic structure features can induce different solvation structures at the interface even for the same reaction intermediate of the simplest electrochemical reaction, and discuss the implication of the complexities on the kinetics and thermodynamics of the reaction system to better address the activity and selectivity trends. We also venture into more intriguing interfacial phenomena, such as alternative reaction pathways and intermediates that are favored and stabilized by solvation and polarization effects, long-range interfacial dynamics across the region far beyond the contact layer, and the dynamic activation or deactivation of single atom sites under operation conditions. We show the necessity of including realistic aspects (explicit solvent, electrolyte, and electrode potential) into the model to correctly capture the physics and chemistry at the electrochemical interface and to understand the reaction mechanisms and reactivity trends. We also demonstrate how the popular simplistic design principles fail and how they can be revised by including the kinetics and interfacial factors in the model. All of these rich dynamics and chemistry would remain hidden or overlooked otherwise. We believe that the complexity at an electrochemical interface is not a curse but a blessing in that it enables deeper understanding and finer control of the potential-dependent free energy landscape of electrochemical reactions, which opens up new dimensions for further design and optimization of single atom electrocatalysts and beyond. Limitations of current methods and challenges faced by the theoretical and experimental communities are discussed, along with the possible solutions awaiting development in the future.
AbstractList ConspectusSingle atom electrocatalysts, with noble metal-free composition, maximal atom efficiency, and exceptional reactivity toward various energy and environmental applications, have become a research hot spot in the recent decade. Their simplicity and the isolated nature of the atomic structure of their active site have also made them an ideal model catalyst system for studying reaction mechanisms and activity trends. However, the state of the single atom active sites during electrochemical reactions may not be as simple as is usually assumed. To the contrary, the single atom electrocatalysts have been reported to be under greater influence from interfacial dynamics, with solvent and electrolyte ions perpetually interacting with the electrified active center under an applied electrode potential. These complexities render the activity trends and reaction mechanisms derived from simplistic models dubious.In this Account, with a few popular single atom electrocatalysis systems, we show how the change in electrochemical potential induces nontrivial variation in the free energy profile of elemental electrochemical reaction steps, demonstrate how the active centers with different electronic structure features can induce different solvation structures at the interface even for the same reaction intermediate of the simplest electrochemical reaction, and discuss the implication of the complexities on the kinetics and thermodynamics of the reaction system to better address the activity and selectivity trends. We also venture into more intriguing interfacial phenomena, such as alternative reaction pathways and intermediates that are favored and stabilized by solvation and polarization effects, long-range interfacial dynamics across the region far beyond the contact layer, and the dynamic activation or deactivation of single atom sites under operation conditions. We show the necessity of including realistic aspects (explicit solvent, electrolyte, and electrode potential) into the model to correctly capture the physics and chemistry at the electrochemical interface and to understand the reaction mechanisms and reactivity trends. We also demonstrate how the popular simplistic design principles fail and how they can be revised by including the kinetics and interfacial factors in the model. All of these rich dynamics and chemistry would remain hidden or overlooked otherwise. We believe that the complexity at an electrochemical interface is not a curse but a blessing in that it enables deeper understanding and finer control of the potential-dependent free energy landscape of electrochemical reactions, which opens up new dimensions for further design and optimization of single atom electrocatalysts and beyond. Limitations of current methods and challenges faced by the theoretical and experimental communities are discussed, along with the possible solutions awaiting development in the future.ConspectusSingle atom electrocatalysts, with noble metal-free composition, maximal atom efficiency, and exceptional reactivity toward various energy and environmental applications, have become a research hot spot in the recent decade. Their simplicity and the isolated nature of the atomic structure of their active site have also made them an ideal model catalyst system for studying reaction mechanisms and activity trends. However, the state of the single atom active sites during electrochemical reactions may not be as simple as is usually assumed. To the contrary, the single atom electrocatalysts have been reported to be under greater influence from interfacial dynamics, with solvent and electrolyte ions perpetually interacting with the electrified active center under an applied electrode potential. These complexities render the activity trends and reaction mechanisms derived from simplistic models dubious.In this Account, with a few popular single atom electrocatalysis systems, we show how the change in electrochemical potential induces nontrivial variation in the free energy profile of elemental electrochemical reaction steps, demonstrate how the active centers with different electronic structure features can induce different solvation structures at the interface even for the same reaction intermediate of the simplest electrochemical reaction, and discuss the implication of the complexities on the kinetics and thermodynamics of the reaction system to better address the activity and selectivity trends. We also venture into more intriguing interfacial phenomena, such as alternative reaction pathways and intermediates that are favored and stabilized by solvation and polarization effects, long-range interfacial dynamics across the region far beyond the contact layer, and the dynamic activation or deactivation of single atom sites under operation conditions. We show the necessity of including realistic aspects (explicit solvent, electrolyte, and electrode potential) into the model to correctly capture the physics and chemistry at the electrochemical interface and to understand the reaction mechanisms and reactivity trends. We also demonstrate how the popular simplistic design principles fail and how they can be revised by including the kinetics and interfacial factors in the model. All of these rich dynamics and chemistry would remain hidden or overlooked otherwise. We believe that the complexity at an electrochemical interface is not a curse but a blessing in that it enables deeper understanding and finer control of the potential-dependent free energy landscape of electrochemical reactions, which opens up new dimensions for further design and optimization of single atom electrocatalysts and beyond. Limitations of current methods and challenges faced by the theoretical and experimental communities are discussed, along with the possible solutions awaiting development in the future.
ConspectusSingle atom electrocatalysts, with noble metal-free composition, maximal atom efficiency, and exceptional reactivity toward various energy and environmental applications, have become a research hot spot in the recent decade. Their simplicity and the isolated nature of the atomic structure of their active site have also made them an ideal model catalyst system for studying reaction mechanisms and activity trends. However, the state of the single atom active sites during electrochemical reactions may not be as simple as is usually assumed. To the contrary, the single atom electrocatalysts have been reported to be under greater influence from interfacial dynamics, with solvent and electrolyte ions perpetually interacting with the electrified active center under an applied electrode potential. These complexities render the activity trends and reaction mechanisms derived from simplistic models dubious.In this Account, with a few popular single atom electrocatalysis systems, we show how the change in electrochemical potential induces nontrivial variation in the free energy profile of elemental electrochemical reaction steps, demonstrate how the active centers with different electronic structure features can induce different solvation structures at the interface even for the same reaction intermediate of the simplest electrochemical reaction, and discuss the implication of the complexities on the kinetics and thermodynamics of the reaction system to better address the activity and selectivity trends. We also venture into more intriguing interfacial phenomena, such as alternative reaction pathways and intermediates that are favored and stabilized by solvation and polarization effects, long-range interfacial dynamics across the region far beyond the contact layer, and the dynamic activation or deactivation of single atom sites under operation conditions. We show the necessity of including realistic aspects (explicit solvent, electrolyte, and electrode potential) into the model to correctly capture the physics and chemistry at the electrochemical interface and to understand the reaction mechanisms and reactivity trends. We also demonstrate how the popular simplistic design principles fail and how they can be revised by including the kinetics and interfacial factors in the model. All of these rich dynamics and chemistry would remain hidden or overlooked otherwise. We believe that the complexity at an electrochemical interface is not a curse but a blessing in that it enables deeper understanding and finer control of the potential-dependent free energy landscape of electrochemical reactions, which opens up new dimensions for further design and optimization of single atom electrocatalysts and beyond. Limitations of current methods and challenges faced by the theoretical and experimental communities are discussed, along with the possible solutions awaiting development in the future.
Author Li, Jun
Zhang, Zisheng
Wang, Yang-Gang
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Zisheng
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4370-4038
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Zisheng
  organization: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jun
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8456-3980
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Jun
  organization: Department of Chemistry and Key Laboratory of Organic Optoelectronics & Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yang-Gang
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0582-0855
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yang-Gang
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38166366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkE1LAzEYhINU7If-A5EcvWzNZnezibdSqxYqCtXz8m7yVrZkk7rJiv33Fq3gaQbmmTnMmAycd0jIZcqmKePpDegwBa1972KYZpqxQqoTMkoLzpJcKjn454dkHMKWMcZzUZ6RYSZTITIhRmT75A3axr3TpYvYbUA3YOnd3kHb6EC9o-tDaJHOom_pwqKOndcQwe5DDLd08bWzjW4iXXv7CbE5FMAZ-uIjuvgzhTt0Bp3Gc3K6ARvw4qgT8na_eJ0_Jqvnh-V8tkogy2VMoBBZaVAhMF4IriSITJWmUKzUBZPFhps8k3VtWM0R6sKAlpIhSoV1WWrOJ-T6d3fX-Y8eQ6zaJmi0Fhz6PlRcMSWYVCw9oFdHtK9bNNWua1ro9tXfP_wb19FtxQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1039_D5TA02606G
crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0221225
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_nanolett_5c01245
crossref_primary_10_1021_jacs_5c05728
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cej_2025_159687
crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202420383
crossref_primary_10_1039_D5NH00216H
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcis_2024_10_166
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhydene_2025_150816
crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0244175
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jpclett_4c02755
crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202502102
crossref_primary_10_1039_D5TA03307A
crossref_primary_10_1039_D4SC01944J
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mtsust_2024_100808
crossref_primary_10_1021_acscatal_5c04054
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11581_025_06149_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1872_2067_24_60283_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_adma_202415265
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcat_2025_115968
crossref_primary_10_1021_acscatal_4c07168
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00589
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Chemistry
EISSN 1520-4898
ExternalDocumentID 38166366
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
23M
4.4
53G
55A
5GY
5VS
5ZA
6J9
6P2
7~N
85S
AABXI
ABBLG
ABJNI
ABLBI
ABMVS
ABQRX
ABUCX
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACJ
ACNCT
ACS
ADHLV
AEESW
AENEX
AFEFF
AFXLT
AGXLV
AHGAQ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQSVZ
BAANH
CS3
CUPRZ
D0L
EBS
ED~
F5P
GGK
GNL
IH2
IH9
JG~
LG6
NPM
P2P
RNS
ROL
TWZ
UI2
UPT
VF5
VG9
W1F
WH7
XSW
YZZ
ZCA
~02
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-a5637de9ea0256298a6397d5907c5085f2d438bbd0b2eab5dac880ee89eb77c22
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 39
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001181652500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1520-4898
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 09:42:48 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:56:13 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a348t-a5637de9ea0256298a6397d5907c5085f2d438bbd0b2eab5dac880ee89eb77c22
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0582-0855
0000-0002-8456-3980
0000-0002-4370-4038
PMID 38166366
PQID 2909608901
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2909608901
pubmed_primary_38166366
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-01-16
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-01-16
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-01-16
  day: 16
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Accounts of chemical research
PublicationTitleAlternate Acc Chem Res
PublicationYear 2024
SSID ssj0002467
Score 2.5863094
Snippet ConspectusSingle atom electrocatalysts, with noble metal-free composition, maximal atom efficiency, and exceptional reactivity toward various energy and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 198
Title Modeling Interfacial Dynamics on Single Atom Electrocatalysts: Explicit Solvation and Potential Dependence
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38166366
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2909608901
Volume 57
WOSCitedRecordID wos001181652500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA6-QC--H-uLCF7rummaJl5E1hUPuiz4YG9LMklhZW1XWwX_vZO0iydB8NJL2xCmM5mv3yTzEXIKgHk0cywSEiDiFiPdxEpEYATCY56BDGIwz3dpvy-HQzVoCLey2VY5WxPDQm0L8Bx5mykPtiWmr8vpW-RVo3x1tZHQmCeLMUIZH5jp8KdbOONBQRZT1HnEpZKzo3Os09ZQ4oSDHkN5FkNQ1_sdZIZkc7P232muk9UGZtKr2i82yJzLN8lyd6butkVevAiaP4pOAyeYaU-d0-tan76kRU4f8ObE0auqeKW9WiwncD1fZVVeUL93bwzjij4Uk5rVpTq3dFBUfvuRH6pR1wW3TZ5ueo_d26jRXYh0zGUV6UTEqXXKaQ-ImJLaV_9sgv_RgHguyZjlsTTGnhvmtEmsBlwFnJPKmTQFxnbIQl7kbo9Q310N4xB0ogy3gquY4-MGx86sExxa5GRmxhEawBcrdO6Kj3L0Y8gW2a2_xWhaN-AYhWJnLMT-H94-ICsMHcGzJh1xSBYzjGp3RJbgsxqX78fBYfDaH9x_A9Yrzak
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling+Interfacial+Dynamics+on+Single+Atom+Electrocatalysts%3A+Explicit+Solvation+and+Potential+Dependence&rft.jtitle=Accounts+of+chemical+research&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Zisheng&rft.au=Li%2C+Jun&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yang-Gang&rft.date=2024-01-16&rft.issn=1520-4898&rft.eissn=1520-4898&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Facs.accounts.3c00589&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1520-4898&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1520-4898&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1520-4898&client=summon