CO2 capture in different carbon materials

In this work, the CO(2) capture capacity of different types of carbon nanofibers (platelet, fishbone, and ribbon) and amorphous carbon have been measured at 26 °C as at different pressures. The results showed that the more graphitic carbon materials adsorbed less CO(2) than more amorphous materials....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology Vol. 46; no. 13; p. 7407
Main Authors: Jiménez, Vicente, Ramírez-Lucas, Ana, Díaz, José Antonio, Sánchez, Paula, Romero, Amaya
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 03.07.2012
Subjects:
ISSN:1520-5851, 1520-5851
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this work, the CO(2) capture capacity of different types of carbon nanofibers (platelet, fishbone, and ribbon) and amorphous carbon have been measured at 26 °C as at different pressures. The results showed that the more graphitic carbon materials adsorbed less CO(2) than more amorphous materials. Then, the aim was to improve the CO(2) adsorption capacity of the carbon materials by increasing the porosity during the chemical activation process. After chemical activation process, the amorphous carbon and platelet CNFs increased the CO(2) adsorption capacity 1.6 times, whereas fishbone and ribbon CNFs increased their CO(2) adsorption capacity 1.1 and 8.2 times, respectively. This increase of CO(2) adsorption capacity after chemical activation was due to an increase of BET surface area and pore volume in all carbon materials. Finally, the CO(2) adsorption isotherms showed that activated amorphous carbon exhibited the best CO(2) capture capacity with 72.0 wt % of CO(2) at 26 °C and 8 bar.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1520-5851
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/es2046553