Computationally-Friendly Argumentation Schemes

In an agent activity both paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning can be naturally enriched by argumentation. The contribution of this research is a computationally-friendly framework for formalizing paraconsistent argumentation schemes in information-rich environments. This goal is achi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) Ročník 3; s. 167 - 174
Hlavní autoři: Keplicz, Barbara Dunin, Strachocka, Alina
Médium: Konferenční příspěvek
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: IEEE 01.08.2014
Témata:
argumentation schemes
Cognition
communication
Computational modeling
Cost accounting
Database languages
dialogue
Reliability
Semantics
Tin
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In an agent activity both paradigmatic aspects of communication and reasoning can be naturally enriched by argumentation. The contribution of this research is a computationally-friendly framework for formalizing paraconsistent argumentation schemes in information-rich environments. This goal is achieved by extending agent's reasoning capabilities with non-deductive methods like argumentation skills. We provide a~generic paraconsistent program template permitting for implementation of various argumentation schemes. To do this, we appeal to techniques specific for the~four-valued framework of 4ql, the~rule-based, dlognneg-like query language. Although dealing with paraconsistency in argumentation schemes is not a new subject, our computational approach takes advantage of the tractability of 4ql. The paper concludes with an example of the Expert Opinion scheme implemented in 4ql.
DOI:10.1109/WI-IAT.2014.164