Decision knowledge triggers in continuous software engineering
Decision knowledge encompasses decisions and related information such as the problems the decisions address, their rationale, or alternatives. The management of decision knowledge is considered important for software development, however, it is often not integrated, since it requires additional effo...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | 2018 IEEE ACM 4th International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering (RCoSE) s. 23 - 26 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Konferenčný príspevok.. |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
New York, NY, USA
ACM
29.05.2018
|
| Edícia: | ACM Conferences |
| Predmet: |
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software development process management
> Software development methods
> Agile software development
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software post-development issues
> Documentation
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software post-development issues
> Maintaining software
|
| ISBN: | 9781450357456, 1450357458 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Shrnutí: | Decision knowledge encompasses decisions and related information such as the problems the decisions address, their rationale, or alternatives. The management of decision knowledge is considered important for software development, however, it is often not integrated, since it requires additional effort and developers do not perceive short-term benefits. Continuous software engineering offers new possibilities to overcome these drawbacks: During continuous software engineering, developers perform practices suitable to integrate the management of decision knowledge in their daily work. For example, developers regularly commit code and manage tasks to implement features. In this paper, we present ideas on how to trigger the developers to capture and use decision knowledge during these practices, in particular to 1) package distributed decision knowledge, 2) make tacit decisions explicit, and 3) consider consistency between decisions. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 9781450357456 1450357458 |
| DOI: | 10.1145/3194760.3194765 |

