A Constructive Logic with Classical Proofs and Refutations

We study a conservative extension of classical propositional logic distinguishing between four modes of statement: a proposition may be affirmed or denied, and it may be strong or classical. Proofs of strong propositions must be constructive in some sense, whereas proofs of classical propositions pr...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science s. 1 - 13
Hlavní autoři: Barenbaum, Pablo, Freund, Teodoro
Médium: Konferenční příspěvek
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: IEEE 29.06.2021
Témata:
Calculus
Cognition
Computational modeling
Computer science
Encoding
Focusing
Semantics
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:We study a conservative extension of classical propositional logic distinguishing between four modes of statement: a proposition may be affirmed or denied, and it may be strong or classical. Proofs of strong propositions must be constructive in some sense, whereas proofs of classical propositions proceed by contradiction. The system, in natural deduction style, is shown to be sound and complete with respect to a Kripke semantics. We develop the system from the perspective of the propositions-as-types correspondence by deriving a term assignment system with confluent reduction. The proof of strong normalization relies on a translation to System F with Mendler-style recursion.
DOI:10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470649