Beyond the Turnout Paradox The Political Economy of Electoral Participation /

This Brief uses game-theoretic analysis to debunk the turnout paradox and offers an alternative economic model to elucidate the patterns behind the socioeconomic bias in turnout. The author argues that the turnout paradox-the idea that rational, strategic actors would not vote in an election-is an o...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autor: Medina Sierra, Luis Fernando (Autor)
Médium: Elektronický zdroj E-kniha
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018.
Vydání:1st ed. 2018.
Edice:SpringerBriefs in Political Science,
Témata:
ISBN:9783319739489
ISSN:2191-5466
On-line přístup: Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
003 SK-BrCVT
005 20220618115225.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 180210s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783319739489 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-73948-9  |2 doi 
035 |a CVTIDW07212 
040 |a Springer-Nature  |b eng  |c CVTISR  |e AACR2 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Medina Sierra, Luis Fernando.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Beyond the Turnout Paradox  |h [electronic resource] :  |b The Political Economy of Electoral Participation /  |c by Luis Fernando Medina Sierra. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2018. 
260 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing,  |c 2018. 
300 |a X, 93 p. 9 illus.  |b online resource. 
490 1 |a SpringerBriefs in Political Science,  |x 2191-5466 
500 |a Political Science and International Studies  
505 0 |a Chapter 1: Beyond the Voter's Paradox -- Chapter 2: A General Model of Strategic Voting -- Chapter 3: The Stability Analysis of Voting Games -- Chapter 4: Electoral Participation Bias and the Welfare State -- Chapter 5: Toward a Structural Theory of Turnout. 
516 |a text file PDF 
520 |a This Brief uses game-theoretic analysis to debunk the turnout paradox and offers an alternative economic model to elucidate the patterns behind the socioeconomic bias in turnout. The author argues that the turnout paradox-the idea that rational, strategic actors would not vote in an election-is an overstated problem, and that, contrary to widespread belief, game-theoretic models of elections with highly realistic parameters are compatible with high turnout. The author applies the method of stability sets to the study of voting games so as to characterize the behavior of electoral turnout in response to the game's structural parameters. To illustrate the power and potential of this framework, the author then develops a politico-economic model that generates testable theories about the way in which the modern welfare state and redistribution of wealth can shape the patterns of biased turnout that exist in most democracies. By turning a classic problem of rational choice into a source of new methods of analysis this Brief allows game theory to intervene in relevant conversations about the political economy of electoral participation, creating an opportunity for formal methods to make a welcome contribution to the discipline. As such, this Brief will be of use to scholars and student of political science, economics, political economy, and public policy, especially those who work in the tradition of formal methods. . 
650 0 |a Elections. 
650 0 |a Game theory. 
650 0 |a Political theory. 
856 4 0 |u http://hanproxy.cvtisr.sk/han/cvti-ebook-springer-eisbn-978-3-319-73948-9  |y Vzdialený prístup pre registrovaných používateľov 
910 |b ZE04492 
919 |a 978-3-319-73948-9 
974 |a andrea.lebedova  |f Elektronické zdroje 
992 |a SUD 
999 |c 272837  |d 272837