Resilience compass navigation through manufacturing organization uncertainty – A dynamic capabilities approach using mixed methods

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Resilience compass navigation through manufacturing organization uncertainty – A dynamic capabilities approach using mixed methods
Authors: Chari, Arpita, 1986, Despeisse, Mélanie, 1985, Johansson, Björn, 1975, Morioka, Sandra, Gohr, Cláudia Fabiana, Stahre, Johan, 1961
Source: RE4DY: European “data as a pRoduct” Value Ecosystems for resilient factory Product and proDuction continuitY and sustainability CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 55:375-389
Subject Terms: Dynamic capabilities, assessment, Organizational resilience, manufacturing, supply chain management, compass
Description: In uncertain manufacturing environments, tools that help companies and supply chains navigate unexpected events and promote sustainability are crucial. However, the application of resilience in manufacturing organizations is limited, often focusing on supply chain resilience. This study used mixed methods to minimize subjectivity in manufacturing resilience. A quantitative Content Validity Index (CVI) helped develop the 'resilience compass' assessment tool, while empirical applications in six manufacturing organizations demonstrated its usefulness. The study identifies relationships between 54 resilience practices, 11 dynamic capabilities, and three stages: anticipation, coping, and adaptation, providing decision-makers with actionable insights to enhance manufacturing resilience.
File Description: electronic
Access URL: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543659
https://research.chalmers.se/publication/546614
https://research.chalmers.se/publication/546614/file/546614_Fulltext.pdf
Database: SwePub
Description
Abstract:In uncertain manufacturing environments, tools that help companies and supply chains navigate unexpected events and promote sustainability are crucial. However, the application of resilience in manufacturing organizations is limited, often focusing on supply chain resilience. This study used mixed methods to minimize subjectivity in manufacturing resilience. A quantitative Content Validity Index (CVI) helped develop the 'resilience compass' assessment tool, while empirical applications in six manufacturing organizations demonstrated its usefulness. The study identifies relationships between 54 resilience practices, 11 dynamic capabilities, and three stages: anticipation, coping, and adaptation, providing decision-makers with actionable insights to enhance manufacturing resilience.
ISSN:17555817
18780016
DOI:10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.014