Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study
Saved in:
| Title: | Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Aggarwal, Rahul, 1994 |
| Source: | Studies in Higher Education. 50(9):2011-2029 |
| Subject Terms: | authorship denial, authorship-responsibility, authorship-quantification, contribution analysis, author order, Authorship |
| Description: | In scholarly publications, determining authorship- and the order of authors’ names- has become increasingly challenging. This is partly due to the evolving landscape of multidisciplinary teams, which can involve numerous contributors. Relying solely on descriptive and consensus-based qualitative approaches can lead to uncertainty. The dilemma also extends to cases where a valid contributor may simply receive an acknowledgement for his or her contribution, rather than being listed as a joint author. Trusting authors to adhere to moral standards when deciding authorship and acknowledgments can result in conflicts that are difficult for readers to navigate. This poses accountability challenges, especially when dealing with a substantial number of authors. This study proposes a simplified and transparent quantitative approach to address these concerns. The methodology is based on two key parameters: first, the evaluation of the time invested by each contributor in the publication; and, second, the normalized assessment of the value of their time. Through a contribution analysis utilizing these parameters, a predetermined threshold is established to define authorship. Contributors falling below this threshold can be recognized in some other way, for example, in acknowledgments for their valuable input. While the approach proposed may be more applicable in some disciplines and higher education systems than others, it does offer a quantitative foundation to support qualitative discussions among potential authors, helping them reach a consensus on authorship and authorship order without conflict. This method seeks to prevent injustices and ensure that all contributors have a voice, regardless of their power and influence. |
| File Description: | electronic |
| Access URL: | https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066 https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066/file/543066_Fulltext.pdf |
| Database: | SwePub |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066# Name: EDS - SwePub (s4221598) Category: fullText Text: View record in SwePub – Url: https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?sid=EBSCO:edsswe&genre=article&issn=1470174X&ISBN=&volume=50&issue=9&date=20250101&spage=2011&pages=2011-2029&title=Studies in Higher Education&atitle=Addressing%20authorship%20dilemmas%20in%20scholarly%20publications%3A%20a%20solution-oriented%20study&aulast=Aggarwal%2C%20Rahul&id=DOI:10.1080/03075079.2024.2407947 Name: Full Text Finder Category: fullText Text: Full Text Finder Icon: https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/images/FTF.gif MouseOverText: Full Text Finder – Url: https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=EBSCO&SrcAuth=EBSCO&DestApp=WOS&ServiceName=TransferToWoS&DestLinkType=GeneralSearchSummary&Func=Links&author=Aggarwal%20R Name: ISI Category: fullText Text: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science Icon: https://imagesrvr.epnet.com/ls/20docs.gif MouseOverText: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edsswe DbLabel: SwePub An: edsswe.oai.research.chalmers.se.c6cd4386.3765.46a8.9cfd.a5a5802fed3f RelevancyScore: 1115 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 1114.736328125 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aggarwal%2C+Rahul%22">Aggarwal, Rahul</searchLink>, 1994 – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <i>Studies in Higher Education</i>. 50(9):2011-2029 – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22authorship+denial%22">authorship denial</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22authorship-responsibility%22">authorship-responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22authorship-quantification%22">authorship-quantification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22contribution+analysis%22">contribution analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22author+order%22">author order</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authorship%22">Authorship</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: In scholarly publications, determining authorship- and the order of authors’ names- has become increasingly challenging. This is partly due to the evolving landscape of multidisciplinary teams, which can involve numerous contributors. Relying solely on descriptive and consensus-based qualitative approaches can lead to uncertainty. The dilemma also extends to cases where a valid contributor may simply receive an acknowledgement for his or her contribution, rather than being listed as a joint author. Trusting authors to adhere to moral standards when deciding authorship and acknowledgments can result in conflicts that are difficult for readers to navigate. This poses accountability challenges, especially when dealing with a substantial number of authors. This study proposes a simplified and transparent quantitative approach to address these concerns. The methodology is based on two key parameters: first, the evaluation of the time invested by each contributor in the publication; and, second, the normalized assessment of the value of their time. Through a contribution analysis utilizing these parameters, a predetermined threshold is established to define authorship. Contributors falling below this threshold can be recognized in some other way, for example, in acknowledgments for their valuable input. While the approach proposed may be more applicable in some disciplines and higher education systems than others, it does offer a quantitative foundation to support qualitative discussions among potential authors, helping them reach a consensus on authorship and authorship order without conflict. This method seeks to prevent injustices and ensure that all contributors have a voice, regardless of their power and influence. – Name: Format Label: File Description Group: SrcInfo Data: electronic – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066" linkWindow="_blank">https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066/file/543066_Fulltext.pdf" linkWindow="_blank">https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066/file/543066_Fulltext.pdf</link> |
| PLink | https://erproxy.cvtisr.sk/sfx/access?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsswe&AN=edsswe.oai.research.chalmers.se.c6cd4386.3765.46a8.9cfd.a5a5802fed3f |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2407947 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 2011 Subjects: – SubjectFull: authorship denial Type: general – SubjectFull: authorship-responsibility Type: general – SubjectFull: authorship-quantification Type: general – SubjectFull: contribution analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: author order Type: general – SubjectFull: Authorship Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aggarwal, Rahul IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1470174X – Type: issn-print Value: 03075079 – Type: issn-locals Value: SWEPUB_FREE – Type: issn-locals Value: CTH_SWEPUB Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 50 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science