Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study
Authors: Aggarwal, Rahul, 1994
Source: Studies in Higher Education. 50(9):2011-2029
Subject Terms: authorship denial, authorship-responsibility, authorship-quantification, contribution analysis, author order, Authorship
Description: In scholarly publications, determining authorship- and the order of authors’ names- has become increasingly challenging. This is partly due to the evolving landscape of multidisciplinary teams, which can involve numerous contributors. Relying solely on descriptive and consensus-based qualitative approaches can lead to uncertainty. The dilemma also extends to cases where a valid contributor may simply receive an acknowledgement for his or her contribution, rather than being listed as a joint author. Trusting authors to adhere to moral standards when deciding authorship and acknowledgments can result in conflicts that are difficult for readers to navigate. This poses accountability challenges, especially when dealing with a substantial number of authors. This study proposes a simplified and transparent quantitative approach to address these concerns. The methodology is based on two key parameters: first, the evaluation of the time invested by each contributor in the publication; and, second, the normalized assessment of the value of their time. Through a contribution analysis utilizing these parameters, a predetermined threshold is established to define authorship. Contributors falling below this threshold can be recognized in some other way, for example, in acknowledgments for their valuable input. While the approach proposed may be more applicable in some disciplines and higher education systems than others, it does offer a quantitative foundation to support qualitative discussions among potential authors, helping them reach a consensus on authorship and authorship order without conflict. This method seeks to prevent injustices and ensure that all contributors have a voice, regardless of their power and influence.
File Description: electronic
Access URL: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066
https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066/file/543066_Fulltext.pdf
Database: SwePub
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066#
    Name: EDS - SwePub (s4221598)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record in SwePub
  – Url: https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?sid=EBSCO:edsswe&genre=article&issn=1470174X&ISBN=&volume=50&issue=9&date=20250101&spage=2011&pages=2011-2029&title=Studies in Higher Education&atitle=Addressing%20authorship%20dilemmas%20in%20scholarly%20publications%3A%20a%20solution-oriented%20study&aulast=Aggarwal%2C%20Rahul&id=DOI:10.1080/03075079.2024.2407947
    Name: Full Text Finder
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    Icon: https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/images/FTF.gif
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
  – Url: https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=EBSCO&SrcAuth=EBSCO&DestApp=WOS&ServiceName=TransferToWoS&DestLinkType=GeneralSearchSummary&Func=Links&author=Aggarwal%20R
    Name: ISI
    Category: fullText
    Text: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
    Icon: https://imagesrvr.epnet.com/ls/20docs.gif
    MouseOverText: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
Header DbId: edsswe
DbLabel: SwePub
An: edsswe.oai.research.chalmers.se.c6cd4386.3765.46a8.9cfd.a5a5802fed3f
RelevancyScore: 1115
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 1114.736328125
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aggarwal%2C+Rahul%22">Aggarwal, Rahul</searchLink>, 1994
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Studies in Higher Education</i>. 50(9):2011-2029
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22authorship+denial%22">authorship denial</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22authorship-responsibility%22">authorship-responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22authorship-quantification%22">authorship-quantification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22contribution+analysis%22">contribution analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22author+order%22">author order</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authorship%22">Authorship</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: In scholarly publications, determining authorship- and the order of authors’ names- has become increasingly challenging. This is partly due to the evolving landscape of multidisciplinary teams, which can involve numerous contributors. Relying solely on descriptive and consensus-based qualitative approaches can lead to uncertainty. The dilemma also extends to cases where a valid contributor may simply receive an acknowledgement for his or her contribution, rather than being listed as a joint author. Trusting authors to adhere to moral standards when deciding authorship and acknowledgments can result in conflicts that are difficult for readers to navigate. This poses accountability challenges, especially when dealing with a substantial number of authors. This study proposes a simplified and transparent quantitative approach to address these concerns. The methodology is based on two key parameters: first, the evaluation of the time invested by each contributor in the publication; and, second, the normalized assessment of the value of their time. Through a contribution analysis utilizing these parameters, a predetermined threshold is established to define authorship. Contributors falling below this threshold can be recognized in some other way, for example, in acknowledgments for their valuable input. While the approach proposed may be more applicable in some disciplines and higher education systems than others, it does offer a quantitative foundation to support qualitative discussions among potential authors, helping them reach a consensus on authorship and authorship order without conflict. This method seeks to prevent injustices and ensure that all contributors have a voice, regardless of their power and influence.
– Name: Format
  Label: File Description
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: electronic
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066" linkWindow="_blank">https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066/file/543066_Fulltext.pdf" linkWindow="_blank">https://research.chalmers.se/publication/543066/file/543066_Fulltext.pdf</link>
PLink https://erproxy.cvtisr.sk/sfx/access?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsswe&AN=edsswe.oai.research.chalmers.se.c6cd4386.3765.46a8.9cfd.a5a5802fed3f
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2407947
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 2011
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: authorship denial
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: authorship-responsibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: authorship-quantification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: contribution analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: author order
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Authorship
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Addressing authorship dilemmas in scholarly publications: a solution-oriented study
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Aggarwal, Rahul
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1470174X
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03075079
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: SWEPUB_FREE
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: CTH_SWEPUB
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Studies in Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1