People-positive organizing: Proposing an alternative perspective on “new organizational forms”
Uloženo v:
| Název: | People-positive organizing: Proposing an alternative perspective on “new organizational forms” |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Bremer, Constantin, 1995 |
| Zdroj: | Utveckla innovationsförmåga i det framväxande ekosystemet kring självkörande fordon - Fas II. |
| Témata: | organization design, agile, new form of organizing, organizational form, new organizational form, sensemaking devices, hierarchy, self-management |
| Popis: | Given the ubiquity and power of current-day organizations, innovating how we organize collective effort—developing "new organizational forms"—is a key lever for addressing society’s greatest challenges. Drawing interest from practitioners and researchers alike, the discourse about "new organizational forms" is marked by heated debates between proponents and critics. Proponents regard stories of new form "pioneers" like W.L. Gore, Buurtzorg, and Morning Star as illustrative of the superiority of "less-hierarchical", "self-managing", and "agile" organizing in today’s age. Critics, however, question the newness and benefits of these forms, pointing to coordination issues in new form experiments and the persistence of traditional bureaucratic rules and hierarchical structures in most contemporary organizations. This thesis aims to propose an alternative perspective for understanding "new organizational forms" in more nuanced, imaginative, and practically relevant ways. This aim is addressed through three studies: (a) a deep case study of Zenseact, a Swedish software company designed to be "less-hierarchical", "self-managing", and "agile"; (b) a literature review on "new organizational forms"; and (c) a study of the practitioner discourse about new forms. This thesis contributes by advancing a "people-positive" perspective on organizing. People-positive organizing is grounded in assumptions about human beings—a Menschenbild —that views humans as inherently social, capable, and trustworthy beings rather than as boundedly rational self-interest maximizers. Accordingly, people-positive organizing is about people doing things together to achieve common goals based on the shared assumption that they can trust each other to solve problems locally through collaboration. As argued in this thesis, a people-positive perspective reveals often-overlooked differences among "(new) organizational forms" in their assumptions, purposes, principles, and practices, and nuances differences in structural features that are often overstated. Relatedly, this thesis opens avenues for coordinating and conceptualizing "new organizational forms" differently. It offers a conceptual language to examine, imagine, and design new forms not so much in terms of the structural features they are moving away from—think less -hierarchical, self -managing, de -centralized—but rather in terms of the Menschenbild , sensemaking devices , and situated purposes, principles, and practices they are moving towards . |
| Popis souboru: | electronic |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739 https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739/file/548739_Fulltext.pdf |
| Databáze: | SwePub |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739# Name: EDS - SwePub (s4221598) Category: fullText Text: View record in SwePub – Url: https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=EBSCO&SrcAuth=EBSCO&DestApp=WOS&ServiceName=TransferToWoS&DestLinkType=GeneralSearchSummary&Func=Links&author=Bremer%20C Name: ISI Category: fullText Text: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science Icon: https://imagesrvr.epnet.com/ls/20docs.gif MouseOverText: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: edsswe DbLabel: SwePub An: edsswe.oai.research.chalmers.se.3844dcf2.4d3b.4e0d.bbe2.ea159f69cc11 RelevancyScore: 987 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: PubTypeId: unknown PreciseRelevancyScore: 986.736389160156 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: People-positive organizing: Proposing an alternative perspective on “new organizational forms” – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bremer%2C+Constantin%22">Bremer, Constantin</searchLink>, 1995 – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <i>Utveckla innovationsförmåga i det framväxande ekosystemet kring självkörande fordon - Fas II</i>. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22organization+design%22">organization design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22agile%22">agile</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22new+form+of+organizing%22">new form of organizing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22organizational+form%22">organizational form</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22new+organizational+form%22">new organizational form</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22sensemaking+devices%22">sensemaking devices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22hierarchy%22">hierarchy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22self-management%22">self-management</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Description Group: Ab Data: Given the ubiquity and power of current-day organizations, innovating how we organize collective effort—developing "new organizational forms"—is a key lever for addressing society’s greatest challenges. Drawing interest from practitioners and researchers alike, the discourse about "new organizational forms" is marked by heated debates between proponents and critics. Proponents regard stories of new form "pioneers" like W.L. Gore, Buurtzorg, and Morning Star as illustrative of the superiority of "less-hierarchical", "self-managing", and "agile" organizing in today’s age. Critics, however, question the newness and benefits of these forms, pointing to coordination issues in new form experiments and the persistence of traditional bureaucratic rules and hierarchical structures in most contemporary organizations. This thesis aims to propose an alternative perspective for understanding "new organizational forms" in more nuanced, imaginative, and practically relevant ways. This aim is addressed through three studies: (a) a deep case study of Zenseact, a Swedish software company designed to be "less-hierarchical", "self-managing", and "agile"; (b) a literature review on "new organizational forms"; and (c) a study of the practitioner discourse about new forms. This thesis contributes by advancing a "people-positive" perspective on organizing. People-positive organizing is grounded in assumptions about human beings—a Menschenbild —that views humans as inherently social, capable, and trustworthy beings rather than as boundedly rational self-interest maximizers. Accordingly, people-positive organizing is about people doing things together to achieve common goals based on the shared assumption that they can trust each other to solve problems locally through collaboration. As argued in this thesis, a people-positive perspective reveals often-overlooked differences among "(new) organizational forms" in their assumptions, purposes, principles, and practices, and nuances differences in structural features that are often overstated. Relatedly, this thesis opens avenues for coordinating and conceptualizing "new organizational forms" differently. It offers a conceptual language to examine, imagine, and design new forms not so much in terms of the structural features they are moving away from—think less -hierarchical, self -managing, de -centralized—but rather in terms of the Menschenbild , sensemaking devices , and situated purposes, principles, and practices they are moving towards . – Name: Format Label: File Description Group: SrcInfo Data: electronic – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739" linkWindow="_blank">https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739</link><br /><link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739/file/548739_Fulltext.pdf" linkWindow="_blank">https://research.chalmers.se/publication/548739/file/548739_Fulltext.pdf</link> |
| PLink | https://erproxy.cvtisr.sk/sfx/access?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsswe&AN=edsswe.oai.research.chalmers.se.3844dcf2.4d3b.4e0d.bbe2.ea159f69cc11 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.63959/chalmers.dt/5771 Languages: – Text: English Subjects: – SubjectFull: organization design Type: general – SubjectFull: agile Type: general – SubjectFull: new form of organizing Type: general – SubjectFull: organizational form Type: general – SubjectFull: new organizational form Type: general – SubjectFull: sensemaking devices Type: general – SubjectFull: hierarchy Type: general – SubjectFull: self-management Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: People-positive organizing: Proposing an alternative perspective on “new organizational forms” Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bremer, Constantin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-locals Value: SWEPUB_FREE – Type: issn-locals Value: CTH_SWEPUB Titles: – TitleFull: Utveckla innovationsförmåga i det framväxande ekosystemet kring självkörande fordon - Fas II Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science