In EDS ansehen

Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: a comparison of Sweden and Australia

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: a comparison of Sweden and Australia
Autoren: Shih, Tommy, Chubb, Andrew, Cooney-O'Donoghue, Diarmuid
Weitere Verfasser: Lund University, Lund University School of Economics and Management, LUSEM, Department of Business Administration, Marketing, Lunds universitet, Ekonomihögskolan, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Marknadsföring, Originator
Quelle: Higher Education. 87(5):1339-1356
Schlagwörter: Social Sciences, Educational Sciences, Samhällsvetenskap, Utbildningsvetenskap, Other Social Sciences, Annan samhällsvetenskap
Beschreibung: Significant collaborations with research partners in China are seen in many Western countries. With increasing US-China geopolitical tensions, governments, research institutions, and individuals in established scientific systems are increasingly required to address a proliferating array of risks and challenges associated with collaboration with China. Academic researchers are only beginning to describe how countries are responding to the ongoing need for global scientific collaboration amidst intensifying geopolitical competition. Several studies have examined the securitization of scientific connections with China in the USA, while others have documented developments in nations such as Australia, the UK, and Sweden. However, there is limited comparative research on approaches to international science amid geopolitical tensions. This paper bridges the gap, illuminating the key dimensions of variation in country-level responses by comparing the cases of Sweden and Australia. The questions we ask are as follows: Who responds to the challenges? By what means? And to what ends are responses directed? Swedish government have been largely passive, but Swedish funding agencies have developed “responsible internationalisation” guidelines that aim to induce proactive reflection by institutions and individual researchers. Australia’s approach, by contrast, has centred on legislation, the exercise of ministerial powers, along with sector-wide enactment of expanded due diligence protocols. The comparison highlights key differences in the actors, methods and goals of responses to the intensifying geopolitics of scientific collaboration.
Zugangs-URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01066-0
Datenbank: SwePub
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01066-0#
    Name: EDS - SwePub (s4221598)
    Category: fullText
    Text: View record in SwePub
  – Url: https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?sid=EBSCO:edsswe&genre=article&issn=1573174X&ISBN=&volume=87&issue=5&date=20240101&spage=1339&pages=1339-1356&title=Higher Education&atitle=Scientific%20collaboration%20amid%20geopolitical%20tensions%3A%20a%20comparison%20of%20Sweden%20and%20Australia&aulast=Shih%2C%20Tommy&id=DOI:10.1007/s10734-023-01066-0
    Name: Full Text Finder
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text Finder
    Icon: https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/images/FTF.gif
    MouseOverText: Full Text Finder
  – Url: https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=EBSCO&SrcAuth=EBSCO&DestApp=WOS&ServiceName=TransferToWoS&DestLinkType=GeneralSearchSummary&Func=Links&author=Shih%20T
    Name: ISI
    Category: fullText
    Text: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
    Icon: https://imagesrvr.epnet.com/ls/20docs.gif
    MouseOverText: Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science
Header DbId: edsswe
DbLabel: SwePub
An: edsswe.oai.portal.research.lu.se.publications.c5f1876f.3b65.47b9.b1d2.873aa000a983
RelevancyScore: 1064
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 1064.41540527344
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: a comparison of Sweden and Australia
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shih%2C+Tommy%22">Shih, Tommy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chubb%2C+Andrew%22">Chubb, Andrew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooney-O'Donoghue%2C+Diarmuid%22">Cooney-O'Donoghue, Diarmuid</searchLink>
– Name: Author
  Label: Contributors
  Group: Au
  Data: Lund University, Lund University School of Economics and Management, LUSEM, Department of Business Administration, Marketing, Lunds universitet, Ekonomihögskolan, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Marknadsföring, Originator
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Higher Education</i>. 87(5):1339-1356
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Sciences%22">Social Sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Sciences%22">Educational Sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Samhällsvetenskap%22">Samhällsvetenskap</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Utbildningsvetenskap%22">Utbildningsvetenskap</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Other+Social+Sciences%22">Other Social Sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Annan+samhällsvetenskap%22">Annan samhällsvetenskap</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Description
  Group: Ab
  Data: Significant collaborations with research partners in China are seen in many Western countries. With increasing US-China geopolitical tensions, governments, research institutions, and individuals in established scientific systems are increasingly required to address a proliferating array of risks and challenges associated with collaboration with China. Academic researchers are only beginning to describe how countries are responding to the ongoing need for global scientific collaboration amidst intensifying geopolitical competition. Several studies have examined the securitization of scientific connections with China in the USA, while others have documented developments in nations such as Australia, the UK, and Sweden. However, there is limited comparative research on approaches to international science amid geopolitical tensions. This paper bridges the gap, illuminating the key dimensions of variation in country-level responses by comparing the cases of Sweden and Australia. The questions we ask are as follows: Who responds to the challenges? By what means? And to what ends are responses directed? Swedish government have been largely passive, but Swedish funding agencies have developed “responsible internationalisation” guidelines that aim to induce proactive reflection by institutions and individual researchers. Australia’s approach, by contrast, has centred on legislation, the exercise of ministerial powers, along with sector-wide enactment of expanded due diligence protocols. The comparison highlights key differences in the actors, methods and goals of responses to the intensifying geopolitics of scientific collaboration.
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01066-0" linkWindow="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01066-0</link>
PLink https://erproxy.cvtisr.sk/sfx/access?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsswe&AN=edsswe.oai.portal.research.lu.se.publications.c5f1876f.3b65.47b9.b1d2.873aa000a983
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10734-023-01066-0
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 1339
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Social Sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Samhällsvetenskap
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Utbildningsvetenskap
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Other Social Sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Annan samhällsvetenskap
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Scientific collaboration amid geopolitical tensions: a comparison of Sweden and Australia
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shih, Tommy
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chubb, Andrew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cooney-O'Donoghue, Diarmuid
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lund University, Lund University School of Economics and Management, LUSEM, Department of Business Administration, Marketing, Lunds universitet, Ekonomihögskolan, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Marknadsföring, Originator
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1573174X
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: SWEPUB_FREE
            – Type: issn-locals
              Value: LU_SWEPUB
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 87
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1