Ukrainian refugees and welfare deservingness: a comparative study of UK government discussions around the 2022 Ukraine Conflict and 2015 Migrant Crisis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Ukrainian refugees and welfare deservingness: a comparative study of UK government discussions around the 2022 Ukraine Conflict and 2015 Migrant Crisis
Autoři: Garland, Joshua, Lee, Juhyun
Přispěvatelé: Lund University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences, LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies), Lunds universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar, LUCSUS, Originator
Zdroj: British Journal of Sociology. 76(4):800-813
Témata: Social Sciences, Other Social Sciences, Development Studies, Samhällsvetenskap, Annan samhällsvetenskap, Utvecklingsstudier
Popis: Recent years witnessed mass migration towards Europe, from Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the 2015 Migrant Crisis linked to war in Syria. This article explores UK government discussion around these two significant crises, focussing on the challenges they present and the portrayal of refugees. It asks how far ministers' language differentiated between Ukrainians and Syrians regarding welfare deservingness. Thematically analysing over 100 official speeches, statements and press releases, the extent of racialisation and welfare chauvinism in ministers' discourse on refugees is revealed. Clear racialisation was found between the two refugee groups, but welfare chauvinism persisted for Ukrainians despite more favourable language, reflecting continued conditionality within UK government discussions of migration phenomena that may hold long-term implications for Ukrainian refugees in the UK.
Přístupová URL adresa: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13219
Databáze: SwePub
Popis
Abstrakt:Recent years witnessed mass migration towards Europe, from Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the 2015 Migrant Crisis linked to war in Syria. This article explores UK government discussion around these two significant crises, focussing on the challenges they present and the portrayal of refugees. It asks how far ministers' language differentiated between Ukrainians and Syrians regarding welfare deservingness. Thematically analysing over 100 official speeches, statements and press releases, the extent of racialisation and welfare chauvinism in ministers' discourse on refugees is revealed. Clear racialisation was found between the two refugee groups, but welfare chauvinism persisted for Ukrainians despite more favourable language, reflecting continued conditionality within UK government discussions of migration phenomena that may hold long-term implications for Ukrainian refugees in the UK.
ISSN:14684446
DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.13219