Do We Have to Choose Between Different Concepts of Social Structure? A Comparative Analysis of Approaches and Ideas From Nigel Pleasants, Douglas V. Porpora, and David Easton

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Do We Have to Choose Between Different Concepts of Social Structure? A Comparative Analysis of Approaches and Ideas From Nigel Pleasants, Douglas V. Porpora, and David Easton
Autoři: Rundqvist, Mikael
Zdroj: Philosophy of the social sciences. 55(3):167-204
Témata: agency, critical realism, explanation, ontology, relational concept of social structure
Popis: This study of three different approaches to social structure finds Pleasants's ideas for the use of different concepts of social structure intriguing but based on an untenable view about the possibility to discern an empirical modality. Porpora's approach is based on the idea that the relational concept of social structure cannot be bypassed, ontologically speaking. Easton's idea is to apply the two relational concepts of higher-order and lower-order structure. Relational structures are also salient in the specific scholarly debate studied, which strengthens the idea that it is this concept of social structure that we primarily should focus on.
Popis souboru: electronic
Přístupová URL adresa: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-207427
https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241280716
Databáze: SwePub
Popis
Abstrakt:This study of three different approaches to social structure finds Pleasants's ideas for the use of different concepts of social structure intriguing but based on an untenable view about the possibility to discern an empirical modality. Porpora's approach is based on the idea that the relational concept of social structure cannot be bypassed, ontologically speaking. Easton's idea is to apply the two relational concepts of higher-order and lower-order structure. Relational structures are also salient in the specific scholarly debate studied, which strengthens the idea that it is this concept of social structure that we primarily should focus on.
ISSN:00483931
15527441
DOI:10.1177/00483931241280716