Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on AI-driven decision support in young adult mental health: An analysis through the lens of a shared decision-making framework
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on AI-driven decision support in young adult mental health: An analysis through the lens of a shared decision-making framework |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Auf, Hassan, 1988, Lundgren, Lina, 1982, Nygren, Jens M., 1976, Petersson, Lena, 1968, Svedberg, Petra, 1973 |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in Digital Health. 7:1-13 |
| Témata: | artificial intelligence, shared decision-making, decision support systems, healthcare professionals, and young adults, IDC |
| Popis: | Background: Mental healthcare faces growing challenges due to rising mental health issues, particularly among young adults. AI-based systems show promise in supporting prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through personalized care but raise concerns about trust, inclusivity, and workflow integration. Limited research exists on aligning AI functionalities with healthcare professionals’ needs or incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) into AI-supported mental health services, emphasizing the need for further exploration. Objective: This study aims to explore how AI-based decision support systems can be used in mental healthcare from the perspective of healthcare professionals and in the light of a SDM framework. Methods: A qualitative approach using deductive content analysis was employed. Sixteen healthcare professionals working with young adults participated in semi-structured interviews. The analysis was guided by elements of SDM to identify key needs and concerns related to AI. Results: Healthcare professionals acknowledged both the potential benefits and challenges of integrating AI-based decision support systems into SDM for mental healthcare. Fifteen of 23 SDM elements were identified as relevant. AI was valued for its potential in early detection, holistic assessments, and personalized treatment recommendations. However, concerns were raised about inaccuracies in interpreting non-verbal cues, risks of overdiagnosis, reduced clinician autonomy, and weakened trust and therapeutic relationships. Conclusions: AI holds promise for enhancing triage, patient participation, and information exchange in mental healthcare. However, concerns about trust, safety, and overreliance on technology must be addressed. Future efforts should prioritize human-centric SDM, ensuring AI implementation mitigates risks related to equity, data privacy, and the preservation of therapeutic relationships. © 2025 Auf, Nygren, Lundgren, Petersson and Svedberg. |
| Popis souboru: | |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-55596 https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1588759 |
| Databáze: | SwePub |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | Background: Mental healthcare faces growing challenges due to rising mental health issues, particularly among young adults. AI-based systems show promise in supporting prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through personalized care but raise concerns about trust, inclusivity, and workflow integration. Limited research exists on aligning AI functionalities with healthcare professionals’ needs or incorporating shared decision-making (SDM) into AI-supported mental health services, emphasizing the need for further exploration. Objective: This study aims to explore how AI-based decision support systems can be used in mental healthcare from the perspective of healthcare professionals and in the light of a SDM framework. Methods: A qualitative approach using deductive content analysis was employed. Sixteen healthcare professionals working with young adults participated in semi-structured interviews. The analysis was guided by elements of SDM to identify key needs and concerns related to AI. Results: Healthcare professionals acknowledged both the potential benefits and challenges of integrating AI-based decision support systems into SDM for mental healthcare. Fifteen of 23 SDM elements were identified as relevant. AI was valued for its potential in early detection, holistic assessments, and personalized treatment recommendations. However, concerns were raised about inaccuracies in interpreting non-verbal cues, risks of overdiagnosis, reduced clinician autonomy, and weakened trust and therapeutic relationships. Conclusions: AI holds promise for enhancing triage, patient participation, and information exchange in mental healthcare. However, concerns about trust, safety, and overreliance on technology must be addressed. Future efforts should prioritize human-centric SDM, ensuring AI implementation mitigates risks related to equity, data privacy, and the preservation of therapeutic relationships. © 2025 Auf, Nygren, Lundgren, Petersson and Svedberg. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1588759 |