Writing with AI, thinking with Toulmin: metacognitive gaps and the rhetorical limits of argumentation
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Writing with AI, thinking with Toulmin: metacognitive gaps and the rhetorical limits of argumentation |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Tofan Stofiana, Dadang Sunendar, Yeti Mulyati, Andoyo Sastromiharjo |
| Zdroj: | Ampersand, Vol 15, Iss , Pp 100242- (2025) |
| Informace o vydavateli: | Elsevier, 2025. |
| Rok vydání: | 2025 |
| Sbírka: | LCC:Philology. Linguistics |
| Témata: | Argumentative writing, Metacognition, Metacognitive gaps, Critical AI literacy, Toulmin model, Writing assessment, Philology. Linguistics, P1-1091 |
| Popis: | Argumentative writing is widely recognized as a cornerstone of academic literacy, yet it remains underdeveloped among many undergraduates, particularly in contexts where dialogic reasoning and reflective strategies are not systematically taught. This exploratory mixed-methods study examined three interrelated dimensions of writing in Indonesian EFL settings: argumentative quality analyzed through Toulmin’s model, metacognitive competence measured by the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI), and AI literacy assessed with a purpose-designed questionnaire. Data were collected from 30 final-year students across two teacher-education universities. Among Toulmin’s elements, Rebuttal scored lowest (M = 1.87, SD = 0.43), indicating a persistent weakness in counterargumentation. Metacognitive awareness showed relative strength in monitoring and evaluation but continuing weaknesses in planning and strategy adjustment, while students reported using AI tools such as Grammarly and ChatGPT primarily for surface-level corrections with limited ethical or rhetorical reflection. This study is among the first to empirically map metacognitive gaps emerging from AI-assisted argumentative writing, identifying two types: a regulatory gap (misalignment between awareness and enactment) and a critical-AI gap (mismatch between tool use and rhetorical purpose). The findings advance an integrated conceptual framework linking argumentation, metacognition, and AI literacy in digitally mediated writing. Pedagogically and for assessment design, the study suggests that instruction in argumentation, metacognitive scaffolding, and critical AI literacy should be embedded together to cultivate reflective, rhetorically aware, and ethically grounded academic writing. |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| Popis souboru: | electronic resource |
| Jazyk: | English |
| ISSN: | 2215-0390 |
| Relation: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039025000268; https://doaj.org/toc/2215-0390 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.amper.2025.100242 |
| Přístupová URL adresa: | https://doaj.org/article/6dc5ef61c44e4001a5091d99f7e9b4a2 |
| Přístupové číslo: | edsdoj.6dc5ef61c44e4001a5091d99f7e9b4a2 |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science Buďte první, kdo okomentuje tento záznam!