View in EDS

Calibration and Validation of Global Horizontal Irradiance Clear Sky Models against McClear Clear Sky Model in Morocco

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Calibration and Validation of Global Horizontal Irradiance Clear Sky Models against McClear Clear Sky Model in Morocco
Authors: Abderrahmane Mendyl, Brighton Mabasa, Houria Bouzghiba, Tamás Weidinger
Source: Applied Sciences ; Volume 13 ; Issue 1 ; Pages: 320
Publisher Information: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: MDPI Open Access Publishing
Subject Terms: clear sky model, global horizontal irradiance, calibration, validation, solar energy applications, pvlib python, SOLCAST, fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5), statistical metrics
Description: This study calibrated and compared the capabilities of hourly global horizontal irradiance (GHI) clear sky models for six Moroccan locations, using the McClear clear sky model as a reference. Complex clear sky models, namely Bird, Simplified Solis, Ineichen and Perez, and simple clear sky models, namely Adnot–Bourges–Campana–Gicquel (ABCG), Berger–Duffie, and Haurwitz were tested. The SOLCAST satellite-based dataset estimates were validated against the McClear clear sky model. pvlib python was used to configure the models, and ERA5 hourly fractional cloud cover was used to identify clear-sky days. The study period was from 2014 to 2021, and the study sites were in different climatic regions in Morocco. Bar graphs, tables, and quantitative statistical metrics, namely relative mean bias error (rMBE), relative root mean square error (rRMSE), relative mean absolute error (rMAE), and the coefficient of determination (R2), were used to quantify the skill of the clear sky model at different sites. The overall rMBE was negative in 5/6 sites, indicating consistent overestimation of GHI, and positive in Tantan (14.4%), indicating frequent underestimation of GHI. The overall rRMSE varied from 6 to 22%, suggesting strong agreement between clear sky models and the McClear clear sky model. The overall correlation was greater than 0.96, indicating a very strong relationship. Overall, the Bird clear sky model proved to be the most feasible. Complex clear sky models outperformed simple clear sky models. The SOLCAST satellite-based dataset and ERA5 cloud fraction information could well be used with quantifiable certainty as an accurate clear sky model in the study region and in other areas where complex clear sky models’ inputs are not available.
Document Type: text
File Description: application/pdf
Language: English
Relation: Energy Science and Technology; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13010320
DOI: 10.3390/app13010320
Availability: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010320
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accession Number: edsbas.DD86D28F
Database: BASE
Description
Abstract:This study calibrated and compared the capabilities of hourly global horizontal irradiance (GHI) clear sky models for six Moroccan locations, using the McClear clear sky model as a reference. Complex clear sky models, namely Bird, Simplified Solis, Ineichen and Perez, and simple clear sky models, namely Adnot–Bourges–Campana–Gicquel (ABCG), Berger–Duffie, and Haurwitz were tested. The SOLCAST satellite-based dataset estimates were validated against the McClear clear sky model. pvlib python was used to configure the models, and ERA5 hourly fractional cloud cover was used to identify clear-sky days. The study period was from 2014 to 2021, and the study sites were in different climatic regions in Morocco. Bar graphs, tables, and quantitative statistical metrics, namely relative mean bias error (rMBE), relative root mean square error (rRMSE), relative mean absolute error (rMAE), and the coefficient of determination (R2), were used to quantify the skill of the clear sky model at different sites. The overall rMBE was negative in 5/6 sites, indicating consistent overestimation of GHI, and positive in Tantan (14.4%), indicating frequent underestimation of GHI. The overall rRMSE varied from 6 to 22%, suggesting strong agreement between clear sky models and the McClear clear sky model. The overall correlation was greater than 0.96, indicating a very strong relationship. Overall, the Bird clear sky model proved to be the most feasible. Complex clear sky models outperformed simple clear sky models. The SOLCAST satellite-based dataset and ERA5 cloud fraction information could well be used with quantifiable certainty as an accurate clear sky model in the study region and in other areas where complex clear sky models’ inputs are not available.
DOI:10.3390/app13010320