Analysis of wave breaking on synthetic aperture radar at C-band during tropical cyclones

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Analysis of wave breaking on synthetic aperture radar at C-band during tropical cyclones
Authors: Yuyi Hu, Weizeng Shao, Xiaoqing Wang, Juncheng Zuo, Xingwei Jiang
Source: Geo-spatial Information Science, Vol 27, Iss 6, Pp 2109-2122 (2024)
Publisher Information: Informa UK Limited, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Subject Terms: QB275-343, Wave breaking, tropical cyclone, Mathematical geography. Cartography, GA1-1776, Geodesy, synthetic aperture radar
Description: The purpose of our work is to analyze the effect of wave breaking on dual-polarized (vertical-vertical (VV) and vertical-horizontal (VH)) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image in the C-band during tropical cyclones (TCs) based on the machine learning method. In this study, more than 1300 Sentinel-1 (S-1) interferometric-wide (IW) and extra wide (EW) mode SAR images are collocated with wave simulations from the WAVEWATCH-III (WW3) model during 400 TCs. The validation of the significant wave height (SWH) simulated using the WW3 model against Jason-2 altimeter data. The winds for S-1 SAR images are reconstructed using wind retrievals in VV and VH polarization. The non-polarized (NP) contribution σwb caused by wave breaking is assumed to be the result of the SAR-measured normalized radar cross-section (NRCS) σ0 minus the Bragg resonant roughness σbr without the distortion of rain cells during TCs. The σbr is simulated by imputing wave spectra from the WW3 model into the theoretical backscattering model. It is found that the ratio (σwb/σ0) in VV polarization is related to the wind speed, the wind direction relative with the flight orientation, and radar incidence angle. Following this rationale, the Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) model was used for the estimation of NP contribution σwb during TCs and are implemented for more than 300 dual-polarized S-1 images to validate the model. It is found that for the comparison between the sum of simulation NRCS and SAR observations, the root mean squared error (RMSE) is 1.95 dB and the coefficient (COR) is 0.86, which is better than a 2.83 dB RMSE and a 0.67 COR by empirical model. It is concluded that the AdaBoost model has a good performance on NP component simulation during TCs.
Document Type: Article
Language: English
ISSN: 1993-5153
1009-5020
DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2023.2295467
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/ae56c0a2ad624256a1fc320a46f6a13b
Rights: CC BY
Accession Number: edsair.doi.dedup.....e56a52a7d9f3a6f41e3a7c1046e6107c
Database: OpenAIRE
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first